Book Reviews

Science  20 May 1955:
Vol. 121, Issue 3151, pp. 726
DOI: 10.1126/science.121.3151.726


In the issue of 14 Jan., page 58, J. J. Thomson was incorrectly referred to as Lord Kelvin. As one of our readers has pointed out, J. J. Th9mson was indeed eminent, but he was not Lord Kelvin.