Articles

Critique of the Linear Theory of Carcinogenesis

Science  26 Sep 1958:
Vol. 128, Issue 3326, pp. 693-699
DOI: 10.1126/science.128.3326.693

Abstract

1) Present data on human leukemogenesis by radiation fail to indicate a linear relation between dose and effect. Because data are scanty, such a hypothesis cannot be ruled out statistically, but it is less probable than a nonlinear or threshold relation.

2) Other instances in which carcinogenic agents have been examined from the standpoint of dose and dose-rate relations show many clear instances where the relation is nonlinear and none in which linearity is unquestionably demonstrated.

3) Theoretical consideration of the probability that a single critical molecular event, such as a mutation, will give rise to cancer indicate that a malignant change must be an extraordinarily improbable result of such a perturbation. It is also very difficult to reconcile this mechanism with the rather comparable spontaneous and induced-cancer incidences in species with greatly different numbers of cells.

4) Any scheme in which multiple events caused by the carcinogen are required to produce a tumor is incompatible with a linear relation, while, if a disordered state of tissue is an important factor, a true threshold may even occur. There is much evidence, from cancer research of all sorts, indicating that one or both of these conditions is involved in the carcinogenic process.

Related Content