News and CommentEcology

Qualified Thumbs Up for Habitat Plan Science

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  19 Dec 1997:
Vol. 278, Issue 5346, pp. 2052-2053
DOI: 10.1126/science.278.5346.2052

You are currently viewing the summary.

View Full Text

Log in to view the full text

Log in through your institution

Log in through your institution

Summary

Mark PlummerSANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA-- Last week, 106 grad students from eight universities, led by 13 ecologists, completed an initial assessment of the science behind a divisive environmental policy tool: habitat-conservation plans (HCPs), agreements that allow developers to harm endangered species in return for specified efforts to protect habitat. A growing chorus of environmentalists and scientists has argued that many HCPs are flawed and effectively promote extinction. But at a meeting here last week at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, the new assessment offered a different view: HCPs are far from the junk-science giveaways to developers depicted by their harshest critics. Although the group also reported that the plans are frequently plagued by inadequate monitoring and a lack of important data, the analysis puts HCPs in a better light.