A Species of Small Antisense RNA in Posttranscriptional Gene Silencing in Plants

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  29 Oct 1999:
Vol. 286, Issue 5441, pp. 950-952
DOI: 10.1126/science.286.5441.950


Posttranscriptional gene silencing (PTGS) is a nucleotide sequence–specific defense mechanism that can target both cellular and viral mRNAs. Here, three types of transgene-induced PTGS and one example of virus-induced PTGS were analyzed in plants. In each case, antisense RNA complementary to the targeted mRNA was detected. These RNA molecules were of a uniform length, estimated at 25 nucleotides, and their accumulation required either transgene sense transcription or RNA virus replication. Thus, the 25-nucleotide antisense RNA is likely synthesized from an RNA template and may represent the specificity determinant of PTGS.

Posttranscriptional gene silencing occurs in plants and fungi transformed with foreign or endogenous DNA and results in the reduced accumulation of RNA molecules with sequence similarity to the introduced nucleic acid (1, 2). Double-stranded RNA induces a similar effect in nematodes (3), insects (4), and protozoa (5). PTGS can be suppressed by several virus-encoded proteins (6) and is closely related to RNA-mediated virus resistance and cross-protection in plants (7,8). Therefore, PTGS may represent a natural antiviral defense mechanism and transgenes might be targeted because they, or their RNA, are perceived as viruses. PTGS could also represent a defense system against transposable elements and may function in plant development (9–11).

To account for the sequence specificity and posttranscriptional nature of PTGS, it has been proposed that antisense RNA forms a duplex with the target RNA, thereby promoting its degradation or interfering with its translation (12). If these hypothetical antisense RNA molecules are of a similar size to typical mRNAs, they would have been readily detected by routine RNA analyses. However, there have been no reports of such antisense RNA that is detected exclusively in plants or animals exhibiting PTGS. Nevertheless, PTGS-specific antisense RNA may exist, but may be too short for easy detection. We carried out analyses specifically to detect low molecular weight antisense RNA in four classes of PTGS in plants (13). The first class tested was transgene-induced PTGS of an endogenous gene (“cosuppression”). We used five tomato lines (T1.1, T1.2, T5.1, T5.2, and T5.3), each transformed with a tomato 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase (ACO) cDNA sequence placed downstream of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (35S). Two lines (T5.2 and T5.3) exhibited PTGS of the endogenous ACO mRNA (Fig. 1A). Low molecular weight nucleic acids purified from the five lines were separated by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, blotted, and hybridized to an ACO sense (antisense-specific) RNA probe (Fig. 1B). A discrete, ACO antisense RNA (14) of 25 nucleotides (nt) was present in both PTGS lines but absent from the nonsilencing lines. Twenty-five–nucleotide ACO RNA of sense polarity and at the same abundance as the 25-nt ACO antisense RNA was also present only in the PTGS lines (Fig. 1C).

Figure 1

Twenty-five–nucleotide ACO antisense and sense RNA in PTGS lines. (A) Endogenous ACO mRNA abundance in five tomato lines containing 35S-ACO transgenes. ACO mRNA was amplified by reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction and detected by hybridization with labeled ACO cDNA. (Band C) Low molecular weight RNA from the same five lines and a 30-nt ACO antisense RNA were fractionated, blotted, and hybridized with either ACO sense RNA (B) or antisense RNA (C) transcribed from full-length ACO cDNA. The low hybridization temperature permitted some nonspecific hybridization to tRNA and small ribosomal RNA species, which constitute most of the RNA mass in these fractions. The oligonucleotide hybridized only to the antisense-specific probe (B). Twenty-five–nucleotide, PTGS-specific RNA is indicated.

PTGS induced by transgenes can also occur when a transgene does not have homology to an endogenous gene (1). Therefore, we tested whether this type of PTGS was also associated with small antisense RNA. We analyzed three tobacco lines carrying 35S-β-glucuronidase (GUS) transgenes. Two of these lines, T4 (15) and 6b5 (16), exhibited PTGS of GUS. The third line (6b5×271) tested was produced by crossing 6b5 with line 271 (17), in which there is a transgene suppressor of the 35S promoter in 6b5. There was no PTGS of GUS in 6b5×271 because of the transcriptional suppression of the 35S GUS transgene (18). Hybridization with a GUS-specific probe revealed that low molecular weight GUS antisense RNA was present in T4 and 6b5 (Fig. 2, lanes 1 and 2) but absent from line 6b5×271 (Fig. 2, lane 3). The amount of antisense RNA correlated with the extent of PTGS: Line 6b5 has stronger PTGS of GUS than line T4 (18) and had more GUS antisense RNA (Fig. 2). As for PTGS of ACO in tomato, the GUS antisense RNA was a discrete species of ∼25 nt.

Figure 2

Twenty-five–nucleotide antisense GUS RNA is dependent on transcription from the 35S promoter. Twenty-five–nucleotide GUS antisense RNA was detected by hybridization with hydrolyzed GUS sense RNA transcribed from the 3′ 700 base pairs of the GUS cDNA.

In some examples of PTGS, silencing is initiated in a localized region of the plant. A signal molecule is produced at the site of initiation and mediates systemic spread of silencing to other tissues of the plant (19, 20). We investigated whether systemic PTGS of a transgene encoding the green fluorescent protein (GFP) is associated with 25-nt GFP antisense RNA. PTGS was initiated inNicotiana benthamiana expressing a GFP transgene by infiltration of a single leaf with Agrobacterium tumefacienscontaining GFP sequences in a binary plant transformation vector (19). Two to 3 weeks after this infiltration, the GFP fluorescence disappeared owing to systemic spread of PTGS as described (11, 20). We detected 25-nt GFP antisense RNA in systemic tissues exhibiting PTGS of GFP. It was not detected in equivalent leaves of plants that had not been infiltrated or in nontransformed plants that had been infiltrated with A. tumefaciens (Fig. 3).

Figure 3

Twenty-five–nucleotide antisense GFP RNA in systemically silenced tissue. Lower leaves of untransformed N. benthamiana (WT) and N. benthamianacarrying an active 35S-GFP transgene (35S-GFP) were infiltrated with A. tumefaciens containing the same 35S-GFP transgene in a binary vector. RNA from upper, noninfiltrated leaves of these plants (inf.) and from equivalent leaves of noninfiltrated plants (−) was hybridized with GFP sense RNA transcribed from a full-length GFP cDNA. Only the transgenic N. benthamiana infiltrated with the A. tumefaciensaccumulated 25-nt GFP antisense RNA.

A natural manifestation of PTGS is the RNA-mediated defense induced in virus-infected cells (8). Therefore we investigated whether virus-specific, 25-nt RNA could be detected in a virus-infected plant. Twenty-five–nucleotide RNA complementary to the positive strand (genomic) of potato virus X (PVX) was detected 4 days after inoculation of N. benthamiana and continued to accumulate for at least another 6 days in the inoculated leaf (Fig. 4). Twenty-five–nucleotide PVX RNA accumulated to a similar extent in systemically infected leaves but was not detected in mock-inoculated leaves.

Figure 4

Twenty-five–nucleotide antisense PVX RNA accumulates during virus replication. RNA was extracted from inoculated leaves after 2, 4, 6, and 10 days and from systemic (syst.) leaves after 6 and 10 days (d.p.i.: days post inoculation). RNA was extracted from mock-inoculated leaves after 2 days. Twenty-five–nucleotide PVX antisense RNA was detected by hybridization with PVX sense RNA transcribed from a full-length PVX cDNA.

Thus, 25-nt antisense RNA, complementary to targeted mRNAs, accumulates in four types of PTGS. We have detected 25-nt RNA in other examples of PTGS (22), and never detected 25-nt RNA in the absence of PTGS. This correlation and the properties of 25-nt RNA are consistent with a direct role for 25-nt RNA in PTGS induced by transgenes or viruses (12). Twenty-five–nucleotide RNA species also serve as molecular markers for PTGS. Their presence could be used to confirm other examples of transgene- or virus-induced PTGS and perhaps also to identify endogenous genes that are targeted by PTGS in nontransgenic plants.

The 25-nt antisense RNA species are not degradation products of the target RNA because they have antisense polarity. A more likely source of these RNAs is the transcription of an RNA template. This is consistent with the presence of the 25-nt PVX RNA in PVX-infected cells that do not contain a DNA template (Fig 4, “syst. leaf”). The dependency of 25-nt GUS antisense RNA accumulation on sense transcription of a GUS transgene also supports the RNA template model (Fig. 2). An RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, as required by this model, is required for PTGS in Neurospora crassa (23). With the present data, we cannot distinguish whether the antisense RNA is made directly as a 25-nt species or as longer molecules that are subsequently processed. The precise role of 25-nt RNA in PTGS remains to be determined. However, because they are long enough to convey sequence specificity yet small enough to move through plasmodesmata, it is possible that they are components of the systemic signal and specificity determinants of PTGS.

  • * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: david.baulcombe{at}


View Abstract

Navigate This Article