NET NEWS: Pedagogy First, Technology Later

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  28 Jan 2000:
Vol. 287, Issue 5453, pp. 543
DOI: 10.1126/science.287.5453.543b

Faculty members can get their hackles up when they see administrators trying to force online instruction into the curriculum. At the University of Washington, Seattle, 2 years ago, 900 professors signed a protest letter to the governor (Science, 26 June 1998, p. 2019). At York University in Toronto, Canada, at about the same time, they struck for 2 months. Taking a gentler approach, University of Illinois (UI) faculty members held a seminar.

After a year of talk among themselves and with outside experts, 16 professors from the three UI campuses issued a report last week offering recommendations and precautions for universities planning to add online classes. Although the committee came to no classroom-shattering conclusions, they do give some commonsense advice. Paramount, says chemical engineer John Regalbuto, the seminar's chair, is to have good teachers involved in the development of online instruction every step of the way. “We don't want technology to get ahead of pedagogy,” he says.

The seminar participants warn that get-rich-quick schemes for Internet teaching are doomed to fail. Effective online teaching requires a lot of technical support and instructor time spent interacting with students one on one, they say. The most successful online teaching programs, Regalbuto points out, are those in which students pay extra to take a course with flexible hours, such as full-time workers taking graduate business classes. But historian David Noble of York University warns that the distance learning industry is not about education: “It's about money.” For a school to make money on online classes, he argues, it has to ignore the kinds of recommendations that the Illinois group makes.

Navigate This Article