Role of the Isthmus and FGFs in Resolving the Paradox of Neural Crest Plasticity and Prepatterning

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  15 Feb 2002:
Vol. 295, Issue 5558, pp. 1288-1291
DOI: 10.1126/science.1064540

You are currently viewing the abstract.

View Full Text

Log in to view the full text

Log in through your institution

Log in through your institution


Cranial neural crest cells generate the distinctive bone and connective tissues in the vertebrate head. Classical models of craniofacial development argue that the neural crest is prepatterned or preprogrammed to make specific head structures before its migration from the neural tube. In contrast, recent studies in several vertebrates have provided evidence for plasticity in patterning neural crest populations. Using tissue transposition and molecular analyses in avian embryos, we reconcile these findings by demonstrating that classical manipulation experiments, which form the basis of the prepatterning model, involved transplantation of a local signaling center, the isthmic organizer. FGF8 signaling from the isthmus altersHoxa2 expression and consequently branchial arch patterning, demonstrating that neural crest cells are patterned by environmental signals.

  • * These authors contributed equally to this paper.

  • Present address: The Sanger Centre, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambs CB10 1SA, UK.

  • To whom correspondence should be addressed at The Stowers Institute for Medical Research, 1000 East 50th Street, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA. E-mail: rek{at}

View Full Text