Prebiotic Soup--Revisiting the Miller Experiment

Waves aren't compelled to affect each other as the energy of hypothetical gravitons and undetectable virtual photons combining in Wave Packets to form particles of matter. They can interact in another way – to form interference patterns and holograms of a multispectral nature. That is, the holograms use multiple parts of the spectrum to stimulate the nervous system as well as every bodily sense. In a twist to science's Holographic Universe theory; the holograms also contain the radio and ultraviolet waves, X-ray and gamma rays, sound waves and gravitational waves associated with various Earthly and cosmic phenomena. Way back near the end of the 1980s, the magazine “Scientific American” reported that holograms have been made not only with visible light and X-rays, but also with microwaves and sound waves. There has been much progress since then, and infinitely more progress lies ahead. With multispectral holograms, working computers will eventually be simulated. So shall the nutritious vitamins, minerals, proteins, fats, carbohydrates and water of foods. Even the neurons and glial cells of the brain and nervous system – as well as all other bodily cells – will oneday be capable of being simulated, thus forming an immaterial "spirit body".

"Many religions, from Hinduism to Gnostic Christianity to Mormon doctrine, teach that – as impious as it may sound – it is the goal of humans to become gods." ["Pale Blue Dot – A Vision of the Human Future in Space” by Carl Sagan - Headline Book (1995, p. 382)]

The human body and brain might become immaterial, and entangled with all space and time^ (no doubt many people, even today, would call such invisible, endlessly powerful, entangled beings “supernatural”). A name used for God in the Old Testament is Elohim, which means the “plural majesty of the one god” iledit could mean the billions of earth’s inhabitants** entangled with, and dispersed throughout, the united infinity of the universe and eternity of time. Such entanglement suggests extrasensory perception and telekinetic independence from technology are possible (and that there is truth in practices like astrology), despite modern science’s objections which appear to be based on non-unification.

^ This reminds me of the episode on TV of "Star Trek: Voyager" where Lieutenant Tom Paris became the first person to fly at Warp 10 - at infinite speed, where the traveller's at every point in space at once. Lieutenant Paris said that when he reached Warp 10; he could see Voyager and at the same time he could see the shuttle he piloted away from Voyager. The following may be regarded as a first step toward Star Trek's infinite speed. The Complex Number Plane has a leftward direction on the horizontal X axis which is called the "complex axis" and corresponds to backwards motion in time. The direction to the right on X is called the "real axis" and corresponds to forward motion in time, while the vertical Y axis intersecting the X axis represents the so-called Imaginary Time derived from Special Relativity and quantum mechanics. It's customary today to say imaginary time and the Complex Number Plane are just mathematical tricks - but they could well prove to be like Max Planck's quanta, originally developed for math convenience. Albert Einstein postulated that Planck's quanta were real physical particles (what we now call photons), not just a mathematical fiction. From there, Einstein developed his photoelectric effect (when quanta or photons of light shine on certain metals, electrons are released and can form an electric current). Movement forwards through hypertime's imaginary time is always in the Complex Number Plane's “up” direction and, whether the trip is a relatively short one to Mars or one of countless billions of light years, absolutely no motion occurs in ordinary time’s horizontal direction (Relativity’s time dilation implies time might be stopped, making travel instant). By travelling in the up (or down) direction in hypertime - one form of which is what physicists and mathematicians call "imaginary time" - the object (though macroscopic) is in 2 places at once viz the beginning and end of its journey. It would necessarily also be at every point between the start and finish. Suppose all the mass, electromagnetism, gravitation etc in space, and time, forms a Unification. Then, what could prevent the object from being, like Lieutenant Paris, entangled with every point in space (actually, spacetime) at once?

** Plus the inhabitants of countless billions of other worlds that will be colonized in the past and far future as well as the present and near future by humans who use time travel - perhaps in the form of imaginary time - and have adapted to, or been genetically engineered to fit, other worlds as they explore the universe. Any complicated form of life – humanoid, animal or plant – anywhere in space would have to evolve into existence, unless human biotechnology and genetic engineering of future centuries produced it. The evolution proposed by Charles Darwin is indeed wonderful, and the Miller-Urey Experiment of 1952 made amino acids (which are relatively simple, and are the building blocks of protein) from inorganic material and by natural causes in a lab. Indeed, many molecules – including sugars and amino acids – have been found in space. But evolution appears limited. In a biological sense, the Theory of Evolution certainly explains adaptations and modifications in large forms of life. But believing it also explains their origins is unwarranted extrapolation. It takes an idea that accounts for some parts of life and, since it’s the only scientific explanation we currently have, assumes it accounts for all parts of life. Any large lifeform is far more advanced than any amino acid. My conclusion is that it must be impossible for a collection of amino acids and other molecules to spontaneously develop into a large lifeform. So ultimately, life (whether Earthly or extraterrestrial) had to originate with supremely advanced biotechnology and gradually become more civilized.

"The biological process which lead to intelligent life on earth was a fluke that is unlikely to have been repeated anywhere else in the universe, claims Professor Brian Cox." Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2809183/We-universe-Profe...

Prof. Cox may be correct about intelligent life originating on Earth only. However, saying the biological process leading to that was a fluke suggests he believes evolution was the originator. Advanced genetic engineering/biotechnology would result from centuries of careful theorizing and experimenting – it could never be a fluke if it originates intelligent life. On one hand, he's right – on the other (about evolution producing humans), he's wrong as far as I can tell.