Policy ForumEcology

The Convention on Biological Diversity's 2010 Target

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  14 Jan 2005:
Vol. 307, Issue 5707, pp. 212-213
DOI: 10.1126/science.1106281

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed.  Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

  • Good news and bad news for the 2010 biodiversity target

    We sometimes wonder whether the best 2010 biodiversity target would be a “significant reduction” in the rate of production of new indicators. But we agree with Balmford et al. (Science, Policy Forum, 14 January 2005) on the need for additional biodiversity indicators for 2010 that better incorporate socio-economic factors. We have been exploring such indicators, based on the curves that track land-use changes in t...

    Show More
    Competing Interests: None declared.