EDITORIAL

A Welcome New Look

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  16 Jun 2006:
Vol. 312, Issue 5780, pp. 1573
DOI: 10.1126/science.1130850

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed.  Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

  • Begging to Differ: Without Consensus, There Is No "New Look"

    I respectfully disagree with Mr. Kennedy’s editorial assessment.

    Under Secretary McCormick once stated the obvious: a new Export Administration Act (EAA) is “a good government issue.” Truer words have seldom been spoken. But the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is awash with controversial regulatory proposals which have engendered angry comments from academia and industry. Aside from creating an anticompetitive com...

    Show More
    Competing Interests: None declared.

Navigate This Article