Review

Genome Plasticity a Key Factor in the Success of Polyploid Wheat Under Domestication

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  29 Jun 2007:
Vol. 316, Issue 5833, pp. 1862-1866
DOI: 10.1126/science.1143986

This article has a correction. Please see:

Abstract

Wheat was domesticated about 10,000 years ago and has since spread worldwide to become one of the major crops. Its adaptability to diverse environments and end uses is surprising given the diversity bottlenecks expected from recent domestication and polyploid speciation events. Wheat compensates for these bottlenecks by capturing part of the genetic diversity of its progenitors and by generating new diversity at a relatively fast pace. Frequent gene deletions and disruptions generated by a fast replacement rate of repetitive sequences are buffered by the polyploid nature of wheat, resulting in subtle dosage effects on which selection can operate.

With 620 million tons produced annually worldwide, wheat provides about one-fifth of the calories consumed by humans (1). Roughly 95% of the wheat crop is common wheat, used for making bread, cookies, and pastries, whereas the remaining 5% is durum wheat, used for making pasta and other semolina products. Einkorn wheat and other hulled wheats, namely emmer and spelt, are today relic crops of minor economic importance (2, 3).

Einkorn is a diploid species, whereas durum and common wheat are polyploid species that originated by interspecific hybridization of two and three different diploid species, respectively (Fig. 1). The success of these domesticated polyploid species parallels the success of natural polyploid species, which represent more than 70% of plant species [reviewed in (4)] and tend to have more extended geographic distributions than those of their close diploid relatives (5). Consequently, recent advances in wheat genomics may shed light on the genetic causes of the broad adaptability of natural polyploid plant species as well.

Fig. 1.

Wheat spikes showing (A) brittle rachis, (B to D) nonbrittle rachis, (A and B) hulled grain, and (C and D) naked grain. (A) Wild emmer wheat (T. turgidum ssp. dicoccoides), (B) domesticated emmer (T. turgidum ssp. dicoccon), (C) durum (T. turgidum ssp. durum), and (D) common wheat (T. aestivum). White scale bars represent 1 cm. Letters at the lower right corner indicate the genome formula of each type of wheat. Gene symbols: Br, brittle rachis; Tg, tenacious glumes; and Q, square head. [Photos by C. Uauy]

Wheat Domestication

The transition from hunting and gathering to agrarian lifestyles in western Asia was a threshold in the evolution of human societies. Domestication of three cereals—einkorn, emmer, and barley—marked the beginning of that process (6). Genetic relationships between wild and domesticated einkorn and emmer suggest that the region west of Diyarbakir in southeastern Turkey is the most likely site of their domestication (Fig. 2) (79). From this area, the expansion of agriculture lead to the dissemination of domesticated einkorn (T. monococcum, genomes AmAm) and domesticated emmer [T. turgidum subspecies (ssp.) dicoccon, genomes BBAA] across Asia, Europe, and Africa. Southwestern expansion of domesticated emmer cultivation resulted in sympatry with the southern subpopulation of wild emmer (T. turgidum ssp. dicoccoides, genomes BBAA). Gene exchanges between the northern domesticated emmer and the southern wild emmer populations or emmer domesticated in the southern region resulted in the formation of a center of domesticated emmer diversity in southern Levant (Fig. 2) (9). The consequence was a subdivision of domesticated emmer into northern and southern subpopulations with an increase in gene diversity in the latter (9). Northeast expansion of domesticated emmer cultivation resulted in sympatry with Aegilops tauschii (genomes DD) and the emergence of hexaploid common wheat (T. aestivum, genomes BBAADD) (10) within the corridor stretching from Armenia to the southwestern coastal area of the Caspian Sea (11) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

The origin and current distribution of wheat. The wheat production map was provided by Dave Hodson, CIMMYT (20). The solid line ovals in the inset indicate the putative geographic regions of origin of the cultivated forms, whereas the dotted red line indicates a southern center of domesticated emmer diversity. The approximate distributions of wild emmer and Ae. tauschii are indicated by dots, and that of wild einkorn by yellow shading (3). Numbers indicate archaeological sites where remains of domesticated cereals dating back more than 9000 years BP were found: 1, Tell Aswad; 2, Abu Hureyra; 3, Cafer Höyük; 4, Jericho; 5, Cayönü; 6, Nahal Hemar; and 7, Nevali Cori [from (2)].

The genetic changes responsible for the suite of traits that differentiate domesticated plants from their wild ancestors are referred to as the domestication syndrome (12). In wheat, as in other cereals, a primary component of this syndrome was the loss of spike shattering, preventing the grains from scattering by wind and facilitating harvesting (Fig. 1). Abscission scars of einkorn remains from archeological sites in northern Syria and southeastern Turkey revealed a gradual increase in nonshattering einkorn spikes from 9250 to 6500 years before the present (BP), a discovery interpreted as evidence of a prolonged domestication period of cereals (13). The chromosome locations of the genes controlling shattering in einkorn are unknown, but in emmer wheat shattering is determined by the Br (brittle rachis) loci on chromosomes 3A and 3B (14) (Fig. 1).

Another important trait for wheat domestication was the loss of tough glumes, converting hulled wheat into free-threshing wheat (Fig. 1). The primary genetic determinants of the free-threshing habit are recessive mutations at the Tg (tenacious glume) loci (15), accompanied by modifying effects of the dominant mutation at the Q locus and mutations at several other loci (15). The recent cloning of Q, which also controls the square spike phenotype in common wheat, showed that it encodes an AP2-like transcription factor. The mutation that gave rise to the Q allele is the same in tetraploid and hexaploid free-threshing wheats, suggesting that it occurred only once (16).

Seeds of free-threshing wheat began to appear in archaeological sites about 8500 years BP (2, 17). The tetraploid forms of these Neolithic free-threshing wheats may be the ancestor of the modern large-seeded, free-threshing durum (Fig. 1), which is genetically most closely related to the Mediterranean and Ethiopian subpopulations of domesticated emmer (Fig. 2) (9). The first archaeological records of durum appeared in Egypt during the Greco-Roman times [reviewed in (2)].

Other traits of the wheat domestication syndrome shared by all domesticated wheats are increased seed size (Fig. 1, A and B), reduced number of tillers, more erect growth, and reduced seed dormancy. One gene affecting seed size is GPC-B1, an early regulator of senescence with pleiotropic effects on grain nutrient content (18). In some genotypes and environments, the accelerated grain maturity conferred by the functional GPC-B1 allele is associated with smaller seeds (19). Therefore, indirect selection for large seeds may explain the fixation of the nonfunctional GPC-B1 allele in both durum and T. aestivum (18). Except for Q and GPC-B1, no other genes relevant to the wheat domestication syndrome have been isolated so far, and a systematic effort to do so is long overdue. Not only is this knowledge critical for understanding the genetic and molecular mechanisms of domestication, it is also possible that genetic variation at these same loci plays an important role in the success of wheat as a modern crop.

Success of Wheat as a Crop

Domesticated wheat exemplifies the positive correlation between ploidy and success as a crop. In almost all areas where domesticated einkorn and domesticated emmer were cultivated together, it was domesticated emmer that became the primary cereal (2). Emmer remained the most important crop in the Fertile Crescent until the early Bronze Age, when it was replaced by free-threshing wheat (2). Although a free-threshing form of einkorn has been identified, it is not widely cultivated because of the association between soft glumes and reduced ear length in this diploid species (17).

The story repeated itself, with hexaploid T. aestivum expanding further than durum. Today, hexaploid T. aestivum accounts for most of the global wheat crop and is grown from Norway and Russia at 65°N to Argentina at 45°S (Fig. 2) (20). However, in tropical and subtropical regions wheat is restricted to higher elevations. Although the dominance of tetraploid wheat over diploid wheat potentially could be attributed to the greater robustness of tetraploid wheat, this does not explain the dominance of T. aestivum over durum. Durum often has larger seeds than hexaploid wheat (Fig. 1, C and D) and similar yield potential as that of hexaploid wheat under optimum growth conditions (table S1).

The vast majority of polyploid plants, including wheat, originated by hybridization between different species (allopolyploidy). Allopolyploidy results in the convergence in a single organism of genomes previously adapted to different environments, thus creating the potential for the adaptation of the new allopolyploid species to a wider range of environmental conditions. This has clearly been the case for hexaploid wheat, which combines the D genome from Ae. tauschii with the AB genomes from tetraploid wheat. Compared with tetraploid wheat, hexaploid T. aestivum has broader adaptability to different photoperiod and vernalization requirements; improved tolerance to salt, low pH, aluminum, and frost; better resistance to several pests and diseases; and extended potential to make different food products (table S2).

This does not mean, however, that gene expression in an allopolyploid is the summation of gene expression in its diploid ancestors. Nonadditive gene expression has been reported in numerous artificial allopolyploids [reviewed in (4, 21)]. Rapid and stochastic processes of differential gene expression (22) provide an additional source of genetic variation that could be important for the successful adaptation of new allopolyploids.

There are detrimental aspects to polyploidy as well. Polyploid speciation is accompanied by a polyploidy bottleneck (5), in which the small number of plants contributing to the formation of a new polyploid species constrains its initial gene diversity. Because only afew Ae. tauschii genotypes participated in the origin of T. aestivum (23, 24), its D-genome diversity is expected to be limited.

Recent advances in the understanding of the dynamics of gene diversity during domestication and the subsequent evolution of polyploid wheat are reviewed in the following sections to reconcile these opposing effects of polyploidy and to shed light on the mechanisms by which T. aestivum has come to be one of humankind's most important crops (Fig. 2).

The Capture of Preexisting Diversity

Domestication is accompanied by domestication bottlenecks, resulting in reduced gene diversity [reviewed by (25)]. A study using 131 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) loci showed that gene diversity values in cultivated emmer were 58% of those observed in wild emmer across its entire geographic distribution (9). A similar estimate (51%) was obtained for nucleotide diversity (26). For comparison, nucleotide gene diversity values in domesticated maize and pearl millet are 57% (27) and 67% (28), respectively, of those present in their wild progenitors. That self-pollinating emmer has an approximately equivalent proportion of the genetic diversity of its wild ancestor as do cross-pollinating maize and pearl millet is surprising. Several lines of evidence indicate that gene flow between wild and domesticated emmer occurred in all places where the two were sympatric (9). Additionally, if the emmer domestication process took as long as that of einkorn domestication (13), even a slow rate of gene flow would probably be sufficient for domesticated emmer to capture a significant proportion of the genetic diversity of its wild relative.

Additional diversity bottlenecks occurred during the transition from hulled to free-threshing wheat (Fig. 1) and during the polyploid speciation of T. aestivum. A study based on 27 RFLP loci showed that diversity values in T. aestivum D genome are less than 15% of those present in populations of Ae. tauschii from Transcaucasia, reflecting the severity of the initial polyploidy bottleneck (11). A similar estimate (7%) was obtained for nucleotide diversity (26). However, in the A and B genomes of T. aestivum, the average diversity at the nucleotide level was found to be 30% of that present in wild emmer (26, 29). This result suggests that difference in ploidy has presented only a weak barrier to gene flow from tetraploid wheat, including wild emmer, to hexaploid wheat (30), a result also supported by the discovery of hybrid swarms between wild emmer and common wheat (31). In summary, hexaploid wheat captured a larger portion of the natural gene diversity present in its tetraploid ancestor than of the diversity present in Ae. tauschii.

The proportion of diversity captured by T. aestivum from both ancestors is likely to increase in the future, because modern wheat breeders, realizing the importance of expanding diversity for successful crop improvement, are starting to use synthetic wheats in their breeding programs (32). Synthetic wheats are produced by hybridizing different tetraploid wheats and Ae. tauschii genotypes and then inducing doubling of the genomes through colchicine treatment (32).

New Sources of Diversity

None of the plant genes that contributed to the domestication of diploid and ancient polyploid species (e.g., maize) discovered so far are null alleles (33), consistent with the view that domestication was achieved mostly through “tinkering” rather than “disassembling” or “crippling” key genes from wild relatives (33). In a young polyploid species like wheat, however, null mutations of one of the duplicate or triplicate homologous gene copies may have only subtle dosage effects and thus may appear as “tinkering” mutations with a potential to generate adaptive variation.

A null mutation of the GPC-B1 gene in the B genome of polyploid wheat illustrates this point. In tetraploid wheat, the GPC-B1 mutation caused a few days' difference in maturity, whereas in diploid rice RNA interference (RNAi) of the rice GPC gene brings about almost complete seed sterility [Supporting Online Material (SOM) text]. Mutations in one of the three functional copies of a gene in hexaploid wheat are expected to have more subtle effects than in tetraploid wheat. This fact is illustrated by the higher tolerance to induced mutations of hexaploid wheat compared with tetraploid wheat (34). The fact that most of the 21 T. aestivum chromosomes can be removed to produce nullisomic plants exhibiting only minor phenotypic effects leaves no doubt of the buffering effect of polyploidy on gene deletions. This buffering effect is eroded in ancient polyploid species (SOM text).

The abundance of repetitive elements in the wheat genomes (about 83% repetitive) (35) greatly facilitates the generation of null mutations, either by insertion of repetitive elements into genes (36) or by gene deletions (37, 38). As in maize, genes in wheat are embedded within long stretches of nested retroelements and other mobile sequences (Fig. 3). Studies of microsynteny among orthologous chromosomal regions across the tribe Triticeae showed that the intergenic space is subject to an exceedingly high rate of turnover (39). For example, 69% of the intergenic space within orthologous VRN2 regions from T. monococcum and the A genome of tetraploid wheat (Fig. 3) has been replaced over the course of the past 1.1 million years (My) (SOM text).

Fig. 3.

DNA insertions and deletions in orthologous VRN2 regions from the Am genome of T. monococcum (AY485644) and the A genome of durum wheat variety Langdon (new sequence EF540321). These regions diverged 1.1 ± 0.1 My ago. The red lines connect orthologous regions (>96% identical). Arrows represent genes: red, orthologous; blue, ortholog absent; and violet, pseudogene. Rectangles represent repetitive elements in their actual nested structure: red, orthologous; blue, insertions after divergence; green, deletion in the opposite genome (yellow region); and black, not determined. Only 31% of the orthologous intergenic regions have not been replaced. [See SOM text for details.]

These data, along with a comparison of orthologous regions in T. urartu and the A genome of tetraploid wheat (30), yield an average replacement of 62% ± 3% (SEM) of the intergenic regions during the first million years of divergence (Fig. 4 and SOM text). The model in Fig. 4 predicts correctly the very proportion of sequence conservation observed among orthologous intergenic regions in the A, B, and D genomes of wheat (30, 40) and the complete divergence observed in comparisons of orthologous regions between wheat and barley (41, 42) (Fig. 4). To put the magnitude of this rate into perspective, indel polymorphisms from both chimpanzee and human genomes (6- to 7-My divergence time) equal less than 4% of the intergenic regions from these genomes (43, 44).

Fig. 4.

Decay of the proportion of conserved sequences [C(t)] in orthologous intergenic regions with divergence time. The upper and lower red curves were calculated with two independent decay rate constants (K1 and K2), and the blue curve with the average rate constant. The circle labeled A represents identical sequences at the initial time of divergence. The comparison between T. urartu and durum A genome PSR920 regions (circle B) was used to estimate K1 (upper red curve) (30). The comparison between einkorn and durum A genome VRN2 regions(circle C) was used to estimate K2 (lower red curve). Comparison of orthologous intergenic regions between wheat B genome (AY368673) and D genome (AF497474) GLU1 regions (circle D) (59). Comparison of orthologous intergenic regions between wheat (AF459639) and barley (AY013246) VRN1 regions (circle E) (41, 42). [See SOM text for details.]

Studies documenting the impact of this remarkably high rate of DNA replacement on wheat genes are starting to accumulate. Insertions of repetitive elements within regulatory regions of the wheat VRN1 and VRN3 vernalization genes, as well as four large independent deletions within the VRN1 first intron, have been associated with the elimination of the vernalization requirement (4548). A deletion upstream of the PPD-D1 photoperiod gene is associated with the widely distributed photoperiod insensitive allele (49). Such diversity in genes regulating flowering time is particularly relevant because of its large impact on wheat adaptability to different environments. Deletions have also provided increased diversity in wheat products. Puroindoline A and B gene deletions, which have become fixed in the A and B genomes, are responsible for the hard grain texture of pasta wheat. A polymorphism for a Puroindoline A deletion (or for a point mutation in Puroindoline B) in the hexaploid wheat D genome dramatically affects grain hardness, dividing wheat cultivars into those used for bread (hard texture) and those used for cookies and pastries (soft texture) (50). The Puroindoline genes code for proteins located in the surface of the starch grains that facilitate the separation of intact starch grains during milling (50).

The example in Fig. 3 shows two genes affected by deletions within a small genomic region, providing an additional example of the high frequency of gene deletions. Such deletions are fixed in polyploid wheat with an initial rate of 1.8 × 10–2 locus–1 My–1, 10 times faster than the rate in wheat's diploid ancestors (51). However, most deletions are still polymorphic and represent, together with point mutations, an important component of genetic diversity in polyploid wheat (52).

Evidence is accumulating that the creation of artificial allopolyploids can be immediately followed by reactivation of mobile elements (53, 54). In one Arabidopsis allotetraploid, these changes were associated with genomic rearrangements, chromosomal abnormalities, DNA deletions (1% of the genome), and pollen sterility (53). A higher proportion of DNA deletions (12 to 14%) was found in two wheat artificial allotetraploids involving different diploid species than the ones that produced tetraploid wheat (55). An association of these deletions with chromosomal abnormalities would limit the chances of these diploid combinations to generate new successful allopolyploid species. Examination of polymorphisms for gene deletions in the D genome of T. aestivum showed that only 0.17% of the D genome has been deleted during the past 8500 years and that deletions are present at low frequencies, suggesting a gradual accumulation of gene deletions rather than a burst of deletions immediately after the hexaploid wheat polyploidization event(s) (52).

Repetitive DNA can also facilitate gene duplication. A study tracing the evolution of a dispersed multigene family in wheat showed that duplication of a gene into the intergenic space accelerated its subsequent duplication rate 20-fold (56). Additionally, a promoter supplied by a neighboring mobile sequence facilitated the expression of one of the duplicated gene copies as well as the generation of a new gene (56). This study suggests that wheat intergenic DNA facilitates both gene duplication and novel expression of duplicated genes. Studies in rice and maize provide extreme examples of mobile repetitive elements duplicating gene fragments and, occasionally, complete genes across the genome [reviewed by (57)]. The importance of gene duplication in wheat is exemplified by the recently isolated wheat VRN2 and GPC1 genes, both of which likely originated as dispersed duplications after the wheat-rice divergence (18, 58).

Although more research is needed to refine our understanding of the specific mechanisms by which repetitive sequences affect gene content in wheat, evidence already available indicates that the dynamic nature of wheat repetitive sequences readily generates new genetic variation, which may facilitate the success of polyploid wheat as a crop.

Concluding Remarks

Polyploid wheat has been able to compensate for diversity bottlenecks caused by domestication and polyploidy by capturing a relatively large proportion of the variability of its tetraploid wild progenitor. In addition, new variation is rapidly generated in the dynamic wheat genomes through gene deletions and insertions of repetitive elements into coding and regulatory gene regions. These mutations can then be expressed as quantitative gene dosage differences because of the polyploid nature of wheat. Synergy between the high mutation rates and the buffering effects of polyploidy makes it possible for polyploid wheat to capitalize on the diversity generated by its dynamic genomes.

Supporting Online Material

www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/316/5833/1862/DC1

Materials and Methods

SOM Text

Tables S1 and S2

References

References and Notes

View Abstract

Navigate This Article