Report

Silica-on-Silicon Waveguide Quantum Circuits

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  02 May 2008:
Vol. 320, Issue 5876, pp. 646-649
DOI: 10.1126/science.1155441

Abstract

Quantum technologies based on photons will likely require an integrated optics architecture for improved performance, miniaturization, and scalability. We demonstrate high-fidelity silica-on-silicon integrated optical realizations of key quantum photonic circuits, including two-photon quantum interference with a visibility of 94.8 ± 0.5%; a controlled-NOT gate with an average logical basis fidelity of 94.3 ± 0.2%; and a path-entangled state of two photons with fidelity of >92%. These results show that it is possible to directly “write” sophisticated photonic quantum circuits onto a silicon chip, which will be of benefit to future quantum technologies based on photons, including information processing, communication, metrology, and lithography, as well as the fundamental science of quantum optics.

Quantum information science (1) has shown that quantum mechanical effects can dramatically improve performance for certain tasks in communication, computation, and measurement. Of the various physical systems being pursued, single particles of light (photons) have been widely used in quantum communication (2), quantum metrology (35), and quantum lithography (6) settings. Low noise (or decoherence) also makes photons attractive quantum bits (or qubits), and they have emerged as a leading approach to quantum information processing (7).

In addition to single-photon sources (8) and detectors (9), photonic quantum technologies require sophisticated optical circuits involving high-visibility classical and quantum interference. Although a number of photonic quantum circuits have been realized for quantum metrology (3, 4, 1013), lithography (6), quantum logic gates (1420), and other entangling circuits (2123), these demonstrations have relied on large-scale (bulk) optical elements bolted to large optical tables, thereby making them inherently unscalable.

We demonstrate photonic quantum circuits using silica waveguides on a silicon chip. The monolithic nature of these devices means that the correct phase can be stably realized in what would otherwise be an unstable interferometer, greatly simplifying the task of implementing sophisticated photonic quantum circuits. We fabricated hundreds of devices on a single wafer and find that performance across the devices is robust, repeatable, and well understood.

A typical photonic quantum circuit takes several optical paths or modes (some with photons, some without) and mixes them together in a linear optical network, which in general consists of nested classical and quantum interferometers (e.g., Fig. 1C). In a standard optical implementation, the photons propagate in air, and the circuit is constructed from mirrors and beam splitters (BSs), or half-reflective mirrors, which split and recombine optical modes, giving rise to both classical and quantum interference. High-visibility quantum interference (24) demands excellent optical mode overlap at a BS, which requires exact alignment of the modes, whereas high visibility classical interference also requires subwavelength stability of optical path lengths, which often necessitates the design and implementation of sophisticated stable interferometers. Combined with photon loss, interference visibility is the major contributor to optical quantum circuit performance.

Fig. 1.

Silica-on-silicon integrated quantum photonic circuits. (A) A directional coupler, which can be used as the building block for integrated photonic quantum circuits by replacing the bulk BS. (B) The modeled transverse intensity profile of the guided mode superimposed on the waveguide structure. (C) Design of the integrated two-photon CNOT quantum logic gate.

In conventional (or classical) integrated optics devices, light is guided in waveguides—consisting of a core and slightly lower refractive index cladding (analogous to an optical fiber)—which are usually fabricated on a semiconductor chip. By careful choice of core and cladding dimensions and refractive index difference, it is possible to design such waveguides to support only a single transverse mode for a given wavelength range. Coupling between waveguides, to realize BS-like operation, can be achieved when two waveguides are brought sufficiently close together that the evanescent fields overlap; this is known as a directional coupler. By lithographically tuning the separation between the waveguides and the length of the coupler, the amount of light coupling from one waveguide into the other (the coupling ratio 1 – η, where η is equivalent to BS reflectivity) can be tuned.

The most promising approach to photonic quantum circuits for practical technologies appears to be realizing integrated optics devices that operate at the single-photon level. Key requirement are single-mode guiding of single photons, high-visibility classical interference, high-visibility quantum interference, and the ability to combine these effects in a waveguide optical network.

We required a material system that (i) is low loss at a wavelength of λ ∼ 800 nm, where commercial silicon avalanche photodiode single-photon counting modules (SPCMs) are near their peak efficiency of ∼70%; (ii) enables a refractive index contrast Δ = (ncore2ncladding2)/2ncore2 that results in single-mode operation for waveguide dimensions comparable to the core size of conventional single-mode optical fibers at ∼ 800 nm (4 to 5 μm), to allow good coupling of photons to fiber-coupled single-photon sources and detectors; and (iii) is amenable to standard optical lithography fabrication techniques. The most promising material system to meet these requirements was silica (silicon dioxide SiO2), with a low level of doping to control the refractive index, grown on a silicon substrate (Fig. 1B).

A refractive index contrast of Δ = 0.5% was chosen to give single-mode operation at 804 nm for 3.5 by 3.5 μm waveguides (25). This value of Δ provides moderate mode confinement (the transverse intensity profile is shown in Fig. 1B), thereby minimizing the effects of fabrication or modeling imperfections. We designed a number of devices, including directional couplers with various η's, Mach-Zender interferometers (consisting of two directional couplers), and more sophisticated devices built up from several directional couplers with different η's.

Starting with a 4′′ silicon wafer, a 16-μm layer of thermally grown undoped silica was deposited as a buffer (material I in Fig. 1B), followed by flame hydrolysis deposition of a 3.5-μm waveguide core of silica doped with germanium and boron oxides (II). The core material was patterned into 3.5-μm-wide waveguides with standard optical lithography techniques and finally overgrown with a further 16-μm cladding layer of phosphorus and boron-doped silica with a refractive index matched to that of the buffer (III). The wafer was diced into several dozen individual chips, each containing typically several devices. Some chips were polished to enhance coupling in and out of the waveguides (26).

We used a beta-barium borate type-I spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) crystal, pumped with a 60-mW, 402-nm continuous wave diode laser to produce 804-nm degenerate photon pairs at a detected rate of 4000 s–1 when collected into single-mode polarization maintaining fibers (PMFs). We used 2-nm interference filters to ensure good spectral indistinguishability (27). Single photons were launched into the waveguides on the integrated optical chips and then collected at the outputs using two arrays of 8 PMFs, with 250 μm spacing, to match that of the waveguides, and detected with fiber-coupled SPCMs. The PMF arrays and chip were directly butt-coupled, with index matching fluid. Overall coupling efficiencies of ∼60% through the device (insertion loss = 40%) were routinely achieved (28).

Figure 2 shows the classic signature of quantum interference: a dip in the rate of detecting two photons at each output of a directional coupler near zero delay in relative photon arrival time (24). The raw visibility (29) V = 94.8 ± 0.5% is a measure of the quality of the interference and demonstrates very good quantum behavior of photons in an integrated optics architecture.

Fig. 2.

Quantum interference in an integrated waveguide coupler. The plot shows the rate of detecting a photon at each output of the coupler as a function of the relative delay in arrival time of the photons. The error bars are smaller than the data points.

Figure 3A shows the measured nonclassical visibility for 10 couplers on a single chip with a range of design η's. The observed behavior is well explained by the theoretical curves, which include a small amount of mode mismatch ϵ and an offset of δη = 3.4 ± 0.7% from the design ratio. It is inherently difficult to identify in which degree of freedom this small mode mismatch occurs (30). Misalignment of PMF fibers in the array (specified to be <3°) would cause polarization mode mismatch. Small spatial mode mismatch could arise if weakly guided higher-order modes propagate across the relatively short devices (31). These results demonstrate the high yield and excellent reproducibility of the devices.

Fig. 3.

Two-photon quantum interference on-chip. (A) Quantum interference visibility at 1/2 and 1/3 couplers that compose a CNOT gate (where the 1/2 couplers range from η (1/2) = 0.4 to 0.6 and the 1/3 couplers are 2/3 this value: η (1/3) = 0.27 to 0.4). The fit to the 1/2 data includes an offset in the coupling ratio δη and mode mismatch ϵ as free parameters. The same values are used for the 1/3 theoretical curve. (B) The average of the logical basis fidelities F for each of the CNOT gates. The solid curve corresponds to a model including only the above values of ϵ and δη. The model does not include the effect of classical interference, which explains the offset.

General photonic quantum circuits require both quantum and classical interference and their combination for conditional phase shifts (32). An ideal device for testing all of these requirements is the entangling controlled-NOT (CNOT) logic gate shown in Fig. 1C (33, 34), which has previously been experimentally demonstrated using bulk optics (1519). The control C and target T qubits are each encoded by a photon in two waveguides, and the success of the gate is heralded by detection of a photon in both the control and target outputs, which happens with probability 1/9. The waveguide implementation of this gate is essentially a direct writing onto the chip of the theoretical scheme presented in (33); it is composed of two 1/2 couplers and three 1/3 couplers.

To allow for possible design and fabrication imperfections, we designed and fabricated on the same chip several CNOT devices with 1/2 couplers ranging from η (1/2) = 0.4 to 0.6 and, correspondingly, 1/3 couplers ranging from η (1/3) = 0.27 to 0.4 (i.e., 2/3 of the 1/2 couplers). The quantum interference measurements described above (Fig. 3B) show that the devices are in fact very close to the design η: δη = 3.4 ± 0.7%. To measure the 1/2 couplers, we sent single photons into the T0 and T1 inputs and collected photons from the C1 and VB outputs (and the reverse for the other 1/2 coupler); the 1/3 data are for the couplers between the C0 and VA waveguides (see Fig. 1C).

For the CNOT device with nominally η (1/2) = 0.5 and η (1/3) = 0.33 couplers, we input the four computational basis states |0〉C|0〉T, |0〉C|1〉T, |1〉C|0〉T, and |1〉C|1〉T and measured the probability of detecting each of the computational basis states at the output (Fig. 4A). The excellent agreement for the |0〉C inputs (peak values of 98.5%) is a measure of the classical interference in the target interferometer and demonstrates that the waveguides are stable on a subwavelength scale—a key advantage arising from the monolithic nature of an integrated optics architecture. The average of the logical basis fidelities (1420) is F = 94.3 ± 0.2%. The fidelities for the other four devices (with different η's) are lower (Fig. 3B), as expected.

Fig. 4.

Characterization of integrated quantum photonic circuits. Ideal and measured truth tables for a CNOT circuit (A); a CNOT with two additional H gates (B); and a CNOT with one additional H gate (C). The physical implementation fabricated on the chip is shown in fig. S1. (D) The ideal and estimated density matrix for the maximally path-entangled state (|20〉–|02〉)/√2.

To directly confirm coherent quantum operation and entanglement in our devices, we launched pairs of photons into the T0 and T1 waveguides. This state should ideally be transformed at the first 50:50 coupler as follows: Math(1) that is, a maximally path-entangled superposition of two photons in the top waveguide and two photons in the bottom waveguide. A very low rate of detecting a pair of photons at the C1 and VA outputs, combined with a high rate of detecting two photons in either of these outputs (with a pair of cascaded SPCMs) confirmed that the state was predominantly composed of |20〉 and |02〉 components but did not indicate a coherent superposition. At the second 50:50 coupler between the T0 and T1 waveguides, the reverse transformation of Eq. 1 should occur, provided the minus superposition exists. A high rate of detecting photon pairs at the T0 and T1 outputs, combined with a low rate of detecting two photons in either of these outputs, confirmed this transformation. From each of these measured count rates, we were able to estimate the two-photon density matrix (Fig. 4D). The fidelity with the maximally path-entangled state |20〉–|02〉 is >92% (35). This high-fidelity generation of the lowest-order maximally path-entangled state, combined with confirmation of the phase stability of the superposition, demonstrates the applicability of integrated devices for quantum metrology applications.

Finally, we tested the simple quantum circuits shown in Fig. 4, B and C, consisting of a CNOT gate and Hadarmard H gates—|0〉→|0〉+ |1〉|1〉→|0〉–|1〉—each implemented with a 50:50 coupler between the C0 and C1 waveguides (25). In both cases, we observe good agreement with the ideal operation, as quantified by the average classical fidelity between probability distributions (36, 37): 97.9 ± 0.4% and 91.5 ± 0.2%, respectively. The device shown in Fig. 4B should produce equal superpositions of the four computation basis states |00〉±|01〉±|10〉±|11〉 and that shown in Fig. 4C should produce the four maximally entangled Bell states Ψ± ≡ |01〉±|10〉 and Φ± ≡ |00〉±|11〉. Although this cannot be confirmed directly on-chip, the above demonstrations of excellent logical basis operation of the CNOT and coherent quantum operation give us great confidence.

Previous bulk optical implementations of similar photonic quantum circuits have required the design and implementation of sophisticated interferometers. Constructing such interferometers has been a major obstacle to the realization of photonic quantum circuits. The results presented here show that this problem can be drastically reduced by using waveguide devices: It becomes possible to directly write the theoretical “blackboard sketch” onto the chip, without requiring sophisticated interferometers.

We have demonstrated high-fidelity integrated implementations of each of the key components of photonic quantum circuits, as well as several small-scale circuits. This opens the way for miniaturizing, scaling, and improving the performance of photonic quantum circuits for both future quantum technologies and the next generation of fundamental quantum optics studies in the laboratory.

Supporting Online Material

www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/1155441/DC1

Materials and Methods

Fig. S1

References

References and Notes

View Abstract

Navigate This Article