News

A Pitched Battle Over Life Span

Science  29 Jul 2011:
Vol. 333, Issue 6042, pp. 549-550
DOI: 10.1126/science.333.6042.549

You are currently viewing the summary.

View Full Text

Via your Institution

Log in through your institution

Log in through your institution


Summary

Demographers might not seem the sort to engage in fiery debate—until you talk to James Vaupel and S. Jay Olshansky. The two sit at opposite poles of a dispute (although never in the same place at the same time) that has long fueled speculation: What will human life expectancy look like in the years to come? Will it continue with steady, almost linear upticks? Or will it veer in a different direction? Vaupel says life expectancies at birth will rise unabated by about 3 months a year in countries where residents live the longest. Olshansky counters that sober realities, such as widespread obesity, will cut life spans short. The Vaupel-versus-Olshansky divide is so deep that it's pulled others into the fray.

Related Content