Flows of Research Manuscripts Among Scientific Journals Reveal Hidden Submission Patterns

Science  23 Nov 2012:
Vol. 338, Issue 6110, pp. 1065-1069
DOI: 10.1126/science.1227833

You are currently viewing the abstract.

View Full Text


The study of science-making is a growing discipline that builds largely on online publication and citation databases, while prepublication processes remain hidden. Here, we report on results from a large-scale survey of the submission process, covering 923 scientific journals from the biological sciences in years 2006 to 2008. Manuscript flows among journals revealed a modular submission network, with high-impact journals preferentially attracting submissions. However, about 75% of published articles were submitted first to the journal that would publish them, and high-impact journals published proportionally more articles that had been resubmitted from another journal. Submission history affected post-publication impact: Resubmissions from other journals received significantly more citations than first-intent submissions, and resubmissions between different journal communities received significantly fewer citations.

View Full Text