Report

Engram cells retain memory under retrograde amnesia

+ See all authors and affiliations

Science  29 May 2015:
Vol. 348, Issue 6238, pp. 1007-1013
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa5542

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed.  Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

  • Convergence of architectures in the brain and big data

    Kitamura et al.'s report, "Engrams and circuits crucial for systems consolidation of a memory" (7 April 2017) describes an unexpected rapid generation of memory engram neurons in the prefrontal cortex during contextual fear conditioning. These neurons then mature slowly over time with input from the hippocampus. This finding suggests that information is not just incrementally moved from the hippocampus to the prefrontal cortex, as previously thought. Instead, there appears to be a fast initial write of data to the prefrontal cortex, followed by a slower process that results in a more stable engram.

    These observations of a two-speed process for saving data are similar to a massive data processing system deployed for analysis of large data sets known as "lambda architecture" (LA; Marz, 2011). LA utilizes a fast speed processing layer for low latency, transient storage and a slower batch layer for fault-tolerant, robust updates and longer lasting storage. A key criticism of LA has been that it is difficult to keep the two different processes synchronized (Kreps, 2014). One easy way to facilitate synchronization of the systems is to stop receiving data inputs during merging of the data from the two layers. Although this solution is impractical for big data analytics, it may have been deployed biologically as rapid eye movement sleep, which is both involved in memory consolidation and marked by an effective shut down of most sensory inputs. Exami...

    Show More
    Competing Interests: None declared.