In DepthBehind the Numbers

DATA CHECK: For innovation, no magic in 3% rule

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  26 Feb 2016:
Vol. 351, Issue 6276, pp. 900
DOI: 10.1126/science.351.6276.900

You are currently viewing the summary.

View Full Text

Log in to view the full text

Log in through your institution

Log in through your institution


Science policy wonks use the ratio of research spending to overall economic activity to judge whether a country is investing enough in innovation. For decades 3% has been the magic number, and Israel and South Korea are seen as technological juggernauts because their investment ratio tops 4%. (The United States stands at roughly 2.8%.) But two new reports question the 3% target. One, from the latest Science & Engineering Indicators issued by the National Science Foundation, warns that no single number can capture the key variables in a country's research portfolio. The second salvo, from the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, notes that research intensity is only a small component of a larger innovation ecosystem shaped by a nation's tax, intellectual property, human capital, and trade policies.