Review

Programmed necrosis in inflammation: Toward identification of the effector molecules

+ See all authors and affiliations

Science  01 Apr 2016:
Vol. 352, Issue 6281, aaf2154
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf2154

You are currently viewing the abstract.

View Full Text

Apoptosis, necrosis, and pyroptosis

The routes to cell death are many, and distinguishing which path a particular cell may have taken remains a challenge. Wallach et al. review current understanding of how programmed necrotic cell death contributes to inflammation.

Science, this issue p. 10.1126/science.aaf2154

Structured Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory lesions often contain dead cells. Cell death in developmental processes characteristically occurs by apoptosis, a form of programmed cell death in which dying cells are phagocytized before undergoing membrane damage. In inflammation, however, cell death is often necrotic, where cellular constituents are released after membrane rupture. The death of cells in inflammation was until recently thought to result from other changes in the inflamed tissue. This view has changed, however, owing to several findings: that necrotic cell death can be induced by biomolecules known to initiate inflammation [such as the cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF) or the pathogen component lipopolysaccharide (LPS)]; that it can be dictated in a programmed manner by distinct sets of signaling mechanisms; and that it yields release of some cellular components capable of facilitating inflammation. It now seems probable that necrotic cell death is not always a consequence of inflammation, but is sometimes rather its trigger. To confirm this notion, we need reliable tools for detection of programmed necrosis in vivo. Because programmed necrosis cannot be distinguished morphologically from accidental cell death, its identification in inflamed tissues must be based on its distinctive molecular details.

ADVANCES

We now have quite detailed knowledge of the mechanisms initiating apoptotic cell death and those initiating two forms of programmed necrosis—necroptosis and pyroptosis. Apoptosis is triggered by proteases of the caspase family. Necroptosis is triggered by specific protein kinases, most crucially receptor-interacting protein kinase–3 (RIPK3). Pyroptosis is triggered by caspases distinct from those mediating apoptosis, and whose activation yields proteolytic activation of the inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and IL-18. All of these molecular initiators of death programs, however, also contribute to the initiation of nondeadly cell functions and are thus not specific markers for death. Two proteins were recently found to act further downstream in the signaling pathways leading to programmed necrosis. One, the pseudokinase mixed lineage kinase domain–like protein (MLKL), is crucial for necroptosis. The other, gasdermin-D (GSDMD), after cleavage by the pyroptosis-mediating caspases, is a major player in their induction of death. Mere expression of activated MLKL, or of the N-terminal proteolytic fragment of GSDMD, can trigger necrotic death. The finding that MLKL and GSDMD play roles in necroptosis and pyroptosis raises hopes that we are approaching the identification of molecules that exclusively serve these forms of death.

OUTLOOK

What are the parameters that can reliably allow us to define a cause-effect relationship between necrotic death and inflammation—and more generally, to define the causal relationships between any disease and its co-occurring pathogenic events? In the case of cell death, this question boils down to the need to identify molecular events that contribute specifically enough to allow their use as definitive molecular probes. The effectors of death—proteins found to mediate deadly changes in the cell—are likely to have that absolute specificity. Whether MLKL and GSDMD are such death effectors has yet to be established. Some studies suggest that MLKL directly permeabilizes membranes, whereas others suggest that it does not. Regarding GSDMD, there is still no knowledge of the mechanisms by which its N-terminal fragment triggers death. Identifying death-effector molecules will be of immense importance to medicine. Such molecules will not only be the best markers for detecting programmed necrosis, but will also serve as the optimal targets for its pharmaceutical arrest in disease.

Effector mechanisms in lytic and nonlytic cell death

(A) In apoptosis, caspases cleave substrate proteins that orchestrate the cell-death process. (B) In necroptosis, protein kinases phosphorylate MLKL, thereby activating it. Phospho-MLKL then causes cell lysis. (C) In pyroptosis, other caspases cleave and hence activate gasdermin-D (GSDMD), thus causing death. These caspases also activate cytokines IL-1β and IL-18. In both necroptosis and pyroptosis, the cell membrane ruptures, releasing cellular components that may trigger inflammation.

Abstract

Until recently, programmed cell death was conceived of as a single set of molecular pathways. We now know of several distinct sets of death-inducing mechanisms that lead to differing cell-death processes. In one of them—apoptosis—the dying cell affects others minimally. In contrast, programmed necrotic cell death causes release of immunostimulatory intracellular components after cell-membrane rupture. Defining the in vivo relevance of necrotic death is hampered because the molecules initiating it [such as receptor-interacting protein kinase–1 (RIPK1), RIPK3, or caspase-1] also serve other functions. Proteins that participate in late events in two forms of programmed necrosis [mixed lineage kinase domain–like protein (MLKL) in necroptosis and gasdermin-D in pyroptosis] were recently discovered, bringing us closer to identifying molecules that strictly serve in death mediation, thereby providing probes for better assessing its role in inflammation.

View Full Text