Report

Tomography reveals buoyant asthenosphere accumulating beneath the Juan de Fuca plate

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  23 Sep 2016:
Vol. 353, Issue 6306, pp. 1406-1408
DOI: 10.1126/science.aad8104

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed.  Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

  • RE: Seismic Velocities on Neptune

    The Canadian Neptune ONC mini-seismic array straddles the Cascadia trench and has 2 Geophones in each plate, north of your study area. Fibre Optic Cable interconnects the signals from these Cascadia Stations all beneath the Pacific Ocean. In looking at the velocity travel times that ONC have been receiving from these geophones, Near-Field quakes to the geophones (under 300 KMs) show a very wide spread of P arrival velocities as seen at the geophones. Significant, velocity /travel time differences of almost a factor of two exist for the same event as seen by different geophone locations. The results are not consistent but may map out a anisotropic stressed zone or low velocity zone along the coast. Do any of your results from your OBS work illustrate similar anomalies?

    Competing Interests: None declared.