Research ArticlesDevelopment

Blocking promiscuous activation at cryptic promoters directs cell type–specific gene expression

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  19 May 2017:
Vol. 356, Issue 6339, pp. 717-721
DOI: 10.1126/science.aal3096

Blocking somatic genes to make sperm

To generate cells with a specific identity, only a subset of genes is used. Most studies focus on factors that turn on cell type–specific gene expression. However, mechanisms are also needed to block expression of genes that specify other cell lineages. Kim et al. identified such a mechanism in the Drosophila male germ line. A multiple–zinc finger protein and a chromatin remodeler were found to act together to block transcription from cryptic promoters. These factors prevented aberrant gene expression and enabled proper differentiation in the adult sperm stem cell lineage.

Science, this issue p. 717

Abstract

To selectively express cell type–specific transcripts during development, it is critical to maintain genes required for other lineages in a silent state. Here, we show in the Drosophila male germline stem cell lineage that a spermatocyte-specific zinc finger protein, Kumgang (Kmg), working with the chromatin remodeler dMi-2 prevents transcription of genes normally expressed only in somatic lineages. By blocking transcription from normally cryptic promoters, Kmg restricts activation by Aly, a component of the testis-meiotic arrest complex, to transcripts for male germ cell differentiation. Our results suggest that as new regions of the genome become open for transcription during terminal differentiation, blocking the action of a promiscuous activator on cryptic promoters is a critical mechanism for specifying precise gene activation.

Highly specialized cell types such as red blood cells, intestinal epithelium, and spermatozoa are produced throughout life from adult stem cells. In such lineages, mitotically dividing precursors commonly stop proliferation and initiate a cell type–specific transcription program that sets up terminal differentiation of the specialized cell type. In the Drosophila male germ line, stem cells at the apical tip of the testis self-renew and produce daughter cells that each undergo four rounds of spermatogonial mitotic transit amplifying (TA) divisions, after which the germ cells execute a final round of DNA synthesis (premeiotic S-phase) and initiate terminal differentiation as spermatocytes (Fig. 1A) (1). Transition to the spermatocyte state is accompanied by transcriptional activation of more than 1500 genes, many of which are expressed only in male germ cells (2). Expression of two-thirds of these depends both on a testis-specific version of the MMB (Myb-Muv B)/dREAM (Drosophila RBF, dE2F2, and dMyb-interacting proteins) complex termed the testis meiotic arrest complex (tMAC) and on testis-specific paralogs of TATA-binding protein–associated factors (tTAFs) (35). Although this is one of the most dramatic changes in gene expression in Drosophila (6), it is not yet understood how the testis-specific transcripts are selectively activated during the 3-day spermatocyte period.

Fig. 1 Identification of kmg as an early differentiation gene.

(A) Male germline stem cell lineage of Drosophila melanogaster. (B) Number of EdU- and pH3-positive cysts per testis and relative expression of Bam and Rbp4–yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) proteins in testes from hs-bam;bam−/− flies after transient induction of Bam by heat shock. Error bars indicate SD (n > 15 testes). (C) Comparison of transcript levels based on microarray in testes from hs-bam;bam−/− flies after no heat shock versus 24 hours after heat shock (n = 2 biological replicates). Red dots indicate transcripts significantly up-regulated (fold > 2, P < 0.05) at 24 hours. (D to E′′) Immunofluorescence images of wild-type testis stained for (D) Kmg (green) and Vasa (red). (E) to (E′′) are high magnifications of the box in (D). In (E′′) (merge), green is Kmg, and red is 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Dotted outlines indicate spermatocyte nuclei. Scale bars, (D) 100 μm; (E′′) 10 μm.

Identification of an early differentiation gene, kumgang

To identify the first transcripts up-regulated at onset of spermatocyte differentiation (fig. S1A, arrow), we genetically manipulated germ cells to synchronously differentiate from spermatogonia to spermatocytes in vivo using bam−/− testes, which contain large numbers of overproliferating spermatogonia (fig. S1, B and C) (7, 8). Brief restoration of Bam expression under heat shock control in hs-bam;bam−/− flies induced synchronous differentiation of bam−/− spermatogonia, resulting in completion of a final mitosis, premeiotic DNA synthesis, and onset of spermatocyte differentiation by 24 hours after Bam expression, eventually leading to production of functional sperm (Fig. 1B; figs. S1, D to O, and S2; and supplementary text). Comparison by means of microarray of transcripts expressed before versus 24 hours after heat shock of hs-bam;bam−/− testes identified 27 early transcripts that were significantly up-regulated more than twofold in testes from hs-bam;bam−/− (Fig. 1C, red) but not from bam−/− flies subjected to the same heat shock regime (fig. S3A). Among these was the early spermatocyte marker RNA binding protein 4 (Rbp4) (Fig. 1C and table S1) (9). At this early time point, the transcript for CG5204—now named kumgang (kmg), from the Korean name of mythological guardians at the gate of Buddhist temples—had the greatest increase among all 754 Drosophila predicted transcription factors (Fig. 1C and table S1) (10).

Kumgang (CG5204) encodes a 747–amino acid protein with six canonical C2H2-type zinc finger domains (fig. S4A) expressed in testes but not in ovary or carcass (fig. S3B). Kmg protein was expressed independently from the tMAC component Always early (Aly) or the tTAF Spermatocyte Arrest (Sa) (fig. S3C), and both kmg mRNA and protein were up-regulated before Topi, another component of tMAC (fig. S3, D and E) (3, 11). Immunofluorescence staining of wild-type testes revealed Kmg protein expressed specifically in differentiating spermatocytes (Fig. 1D and fig. S3, F to H), where it was nuclear and enriched on the partially condensed bivalent chromosomes (Fig. 1, E to E′′). Consistent with dramatic up-regulation of kmg mRNA after the switch from spermatogonia to spermatocyte (Fig. 1C and fig. S3D), expression of Kmg was first detected with immunofluorescence staining after completion of premeiotic S-phase marked by down-regulation of Bam (fig. S3, I to I′′) (12), coinciding with expression of Rbp4 protein (fig. S3, J to J′′) and before expression of the tTAF Sa (fig. S3, K to K′′).

Kmg prevents misexpression of genes normally expressed in somatic cells

Function of Kmg in spermatocytes was required for male germ cell differentiation. Reducing function of Kmg in spermatocytes—either by means of cell type–specific RNA interference (RNAi) knockdown (KD) (Fig. 2, A and B, and fig. S4, A and B) or in flies trans-heterozygous for a CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)–induced kmg frameshift mutant and a chromosomal deficiency (kmgΔ7/Df) (fig. S3, A, C, E, and F)—resulted in accumulation of mature primary spermatocytes arrested just before the G2/M transition for meiosis I and lack of spermatid differentiation. A 4.3-kb genomic rescue transgene containing the 2.3-kb kmg open reading frame (fig. S4A) fully rescued the differentiation defects and sterility of kmgΔ7/Df flies (fig. S4D), confirming that the meiotic arrest phenotype was due to loss of function of Kmg. In both kmg KD and kmgΔ7/Df, Kmg protein levels were less than 5% that of wild type (fig. S4G and supplementary text). kmgΔ7/Df mutant animals were adult-viable and female-fertile but male-sterile, which is consistent with the testis-specific expression.

Fig. 2 Kmg is required for spermatid differentiation and preventing misexpression of somatic transcripts.

(A and B) Phase-contrast images of (A) wild-type and (B) kmg KD testes. (C and D) Comparison of gene expression by means of microarray between (C) kmg KD versus sibling control (no Gal4 driver) (n = 2 biological replicates) and (D) aly−/− versus wild-type testes (26) (n = 3 biological replicates). Red, 555 transcripts significantly up-regulated in kmg KD testes; green, 652 most Aly-dependent transcripts (statistical cut-offs are available in the supplementary materials, materials and methods). (E to E′′′) Immunofluorescence images of (E) GFP visualized with native fluorescence, (E′) Kmg, and (E′′) Prospero (Pros) in testis bearing germline clones of homozygous mutant for kmg marked by absence of GFP. In (E′′′) (merge), GFP is in green, and Pros is in white. Arrowheads indicate young kmg−/− spermatocytes; arrows indicate mature kmg−/− spermatocytes. White dotted lines are the testis outline. Scale bars, 100 μm.

Function of Kmg was required in germ cells for repression of more than 400 genes not normally expressed in wild-type spermatocytes. Although the differentiation defects caused by loss of function of kmg appeared, by means of phase contrast microscopy, to be similar to the meiotic arrest phenotype of testis-specific tMAC component mutants, analysis of gene expression in kmg KD testes showed that many Aly (tMAC)–dependent spermatid differentiation genes were expressed, although some at a lower level than that in wild type. Among the 652 genes with more than 99% lower expression in aly−/− mutant as compared with wild-type testes (Fig. 2D, green dots, and table S2), only four showed similar reduced expression in kmg KD as compared with that of sibling control (no Gal4 driver) testes (Fig. 2C, green dots). In contrast, transcripts from more than 500 genes were strongly up-regulated in kmg KD testes, with almost no detectable expression in testes from sibling control males (Fig. 2C, red dots). Hierarchical clustering identified 440 genes specifically up-regulated in kmg KD testes (fig. S5A, red line, and table S3) compared with testes from wild-type, bam−/−, aly−/−, or sa−/− mutant flies. These 440 genes were significantly associated with Gene Ontology terms such as “substrate specific channel activity” or “detection of visible light” that appeared more applicable to non–germ cell types, such as neurons (fig. S5B). Analysis of published transcript expression data for a variety of Drosophila tissues (6) revealed that the 440 were normally not expressed or extremely low in wild-type adult testes, but many were expressed in specific differentiated somatic tissues such as eye, brain, or gut (fig. S5C). Confirming misexpression of neuronal genes at the protein level, immunofluorescence staining revealed that the neuronal transcription factor Prospero (Pros) (13), normally not detected in male germ cells, was expressed in clones of spermatocytes that are homozygous mutant for kmg induced by Flp-FRT–mediated mitotic recombination (Fig. 2, E to E′′′). The misexpression of Pros was cell-autonomous, occurring only in mutant germ cells. Mid-stage to mature spermatocytes homozygous mutant for kmg misexpressed Pros (Fig. 2, E′ to E′′′, arrow), but mutant early spermatocytes did not (Fig. 2, E′ to E′′′, arrowhead), indicating that the abnormal up-regulation of Pros occurred only after spermatocytes had reached a specific stage in their differentiation program.

Kmg functions with dMi-2 to repress misexpression of normally somatic transcripts

A small-scale cell type–specific RNAi screen of chromatin regulators revealed that KD of dMi-2 in late TA cells and spermatocytes resulted in meiotic arrest, similar to loss of function of kmg (Fig. 3A and table S4). Immunofluorescence analysis of testes from a protein trap line in which an endogenous allele of dMi-2 was tagged by green fluorescent protein (GFP) revealed that dMi-2–GFP, like the untagged endogenous protein (fig. S6, A to A′′′), was expressed and nuclear in progenitor cells and spermatocytes, as well as in somatic hub and cyst cells (fig. S6, B′ and B′′). dMi-2–GFP colocalized to chromatin with Kmg in spermatocytes (fig. S6, B-B′ and B′′′-C′′′), and the level of dMi-2 protein appeared lower and less concentrated on chromatin in nuclei of kmg−/− spermatocytes than in neighboring kmg+/+ or kmg+/− spermatocytes, suggesting that Kmg may at least partially help recruit dMi-2 to chromatin in spermatocytes (Fig. 3, B to B′′′, and fig. S6, D to F). Furthermore, in testis extracts Kmg coimmunoprecipitated with dMi-2 and vice versa, suggesting that Kmg and dMi-2 form a protein complex in spermatocytes (Fig. 3C). Comparison of microarray data revealed that most of the 440 transcripts up-regulated in testes upon loss of function of kmg were also abnormally up-regulated in dMi-2 KD testes (Fig. 3D), suggesting that Kmg and dMi-2 may function together to repress expression of the same set of normally somatic transcripts in spermatocytes.

Fig. 3 Kmg recruits dMi-2 to actively transcribed genes in spermatocytes.

(A) Phase-contrast image of a dMi-2 KD testis. (B to B′′′) Immunofluorescence images of (B) GFP visualized with native fluorescence, (B′) dMi-2, (B′′) DAPI, and (B′′′) (merge) DAPI in red and dMi-2 in green in testis bearing germline clones of homozygous mutant for kmg (dotted line), marked by absence of GFP. (C) Western blot of dMi-2, Kmg, lysine-specific demethylase 1 (Lsd1), and actin after immunoprecipitation of (left) Kmg from wild type and kmg KD or (right) GFP from dMi-2–GFP and wild-type testis lysates. Input, 15% (Kmg IP) or 7.5% (dMi-2–GFP IP) of lysate; FT, flow-through after immunoprecipitation (equal proportion as input); IP, complete eluate after immunoprecipitation. Two bands in the input lane are from dMi-2–GFP testes, which express both dMi-2–GFP and untagged dMi-2. (D) Box plot of expression of 440 derepressed somatic transcripts in kmg KD, dMi-2 sibling control (no Gal4 driver), and dMi-2 KD testes. Whiskers indicate the most extreme data points, excluding outliers. (E) Genome browser screenshot showing ChIP-seq results for Kmg and dMi-2. y axes are normalized read counts based on total 1 million mapped reads per sample. y axes for RNA-seq reads are in log scale. Scale bars, (A) 100 μm; (B to B′′′) 50 μm.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) revealed that Kmg protein localized along the bodies of genes actively transcribed in the testis. ChIP-seq with antibody to Kmg identified 798 genomic regions strongly enriched by immunoprecipitation of Kmg (peaks, q value < 10−10) from wild-type but not from kmg KD testes. Of the 798 robust Kmg ChIP-seq peaks, 698 overlapped with exonic regions of 680 different genes actively transcribed in testes (Fig. 3E; fig. S7, A, C, E, G, and I; and table S5). The enrichment was often strongest just downstream of the transcription start site (TSS), but with substantial enrichment along the gene body as well (Fig. 3E and fig. S7, A, C, E, and G).

ChIP-seq with antibody to dMi-2 also showed enrichment along the gene bodies of the same 680 genes bound by Kmg, with a similar bias just downstream of the TSS (Fig. 3E and fig. S7, B, D, F, and H). The dMi-2 ChIP signal along these genes was partially reduced in kmg KD testes, suggesting that Kmg may recruit dMi-2 to the bodies of genes actively transcribed in the testis (Fig. 3E and fig. S7, B, D, F, and H).

RNA-seq analysis revealed that the 680 genes bound by Kmg were strongly expressed in testes (Fig. 3E and fig. S7, I to K) and most strongly enriched in the GO term categories “spermatogenesis” and “male gamete generation” (fig. S8A). One-third of the genes bound by Kmg were robustly activated as spermatogonia differentiate into spermatocytes and were much more highly expressed in the testes than in other tissues (fig. S8B, red rectangle). The median levels of transcript expression of most of the 680 Kmg bound genes did not show appreciable change upon loss of Kmg (fig. S7, J and K).

Genes that are normally transcribed in somatic cells that became up-regulated upon loss of Kmg function in spermatocytes for the most part did not appear to be bound by Kmg. Only 3 of the 440 genes up-regulated in kmg KD overlapped with the 680 genes with robust Kmg peaks, suggesting that Kmg may prevent misexpression of normally somatic transcripts either indirectly or by acting at a distance.

Kmg and dMi-2 prevent misexpression from cryptic promoters

Inspection of RNA-seq reads from kmg and dMi-2 KD testes mapped onto the genome showed that ~80% of the transcripts that were detected with microarray analysis as misexpressed in KD as compared with wild-type testes did not initiate from the promoters used in the somatic tissues in which the genes are normally expressed (Fig. 4, A and C, arrows). Metagene analysis (Fig. 4E), as well as visualization of RNA expression centered on the TSSs annotated in the Ensembl database (fig. S9A), showed that most of the 143 genes that are normally expressed in wild-type heads but not in wild-type testes were misexpressed in kmg or dMi-2 KD testes from a start site different from the annotated TSS used in heads. Transcript assembly from our RNA-seq data by using Cufflinks for the 143 genes also showed that the transcripts that are misexpressed in kmg or dMi-2 KD testes most often initiate from different TSSs than the transcripts from the same gene assembled from wild-type heads (fig. S9, B to D, and supplementary text).

Fig. 4 Kmg and dMi-2 prevent misexpression from cryptic promoters.

(A and C) Genome browser screenshots of RNA-seq reads mapped to Crick (–) strand (pastel red) or mapped without strand information (gray) (embryo data from modENCODE) (27). Pastel blue lines are a single read that skipped an intron and mapped to two adjacent exons. Red arrows indicate cryptic promoter sites. (B and D) Aly-HA ChIP and input read density in wild-type (with and without Aly-HA transgene) and kmg KD testes for the same regions. Red arrowheads indicate peak of enrichment by means of ChIP for Aly coinciding with potential cryptic promoter sites. (E) Median RNA expression profile of 143 genes expressed in wild-type heads but not in wild-type testes and misexpressed in kmg KD testes, plotted as a metagene excluding introns. TSS, transcription start site; TES, transcription end site. (F and G) Median profile of (F) RNA-seq and (G) Aly ChIP (solid lines) and corresponding input (dotted lines) signals centered at cryptic promoters. (H) Position weight matrix representation of sequence motif most significantly enriched in a collection of 181 cryptic promoters (±150 bp around the TSS), with peaks of Aly binding in kmg KD testes.

Of the 440 genes scored via microarray as derepressed in kmg KD testes, 346 could be assigned with TSSs in kmg KD testes based on visual inspection of our RNA-seq data mapped onto the genome browser (table S6 and supplementary text). Of these, only 67 produced transcripts in kmg KD testes that started within 100 base pairs (bp) of the TSS annotated in the Ensembl database, based on the tissue(s) in which the gene was normally expressed. In contrast, for the rest of the 346 genes, the transcripts expressed in kmg KD testes started from either a TSS upstream (131 of 346) or downstream (148 of 346) of the annotated TSSs. Of the 346 genes, 262 were misexpressed starting from nearly identical positions in dMi-2 KD as in kmg KD testes (table S6), suggesting that Kmg and dMi-2 function together to prevent misexpression from cryptic promoters.

Kmg prevents promiscuous activity of Aly

Many of the ectopic promoters from which the misexpressed transcripts originated appeared to be bound by Aly, a component of tMAC, in kmg KD testes (Fig. 4, B and D, arrowheads, and F and G). ChIP for Aly was performed by using antibody to hemagglutinin (HA) on testis extracts from flies bearing an Aly-HA genomic transgene able to fully rescue the aly−/− phenotype (fig. S10 and materials and methods). Of 346 genes with new TSSs assigned via visual inspection, 181 had a region of significant enrichment for Aly as detected with ChIP, with its peak summit located within 100 bp of the cryptic promoter (Fig. 4, F and G, and supplementary text). Motif analysis by means of MEME revealed that these regions were enriched for the DNA sequence motif (AGYWGGC) (Fig. 4H and fig. S11). This motif was not significantly enriched in the set of 165 cryptic promoters at which Aly was not detected in kmg KD testes (fig. S11B). Enrichment of Aly at the cryptic promoters was much stronger in kmg KD as compared with wild-type testes (Fig. 4, B, D, and G), suggesting that in the absence of Kmg, Aly may bind to and activate misexpression from cryptic promoters.

Genetic tests revealed that the misexpression of somatic transcripts in kmg KD spermatocytes indeed required function of Aly. The neuronal transcription factor Pros, abnormally up-regulated in kmg KD or mutant spermatocytes (Fig. 2, E to E′′′), was no longer misexpressed if the kmg KD spermatocytes were also mutant for aly (Fig. 5, A and B, and fig. S12, A to F), even though germ cells in kmg KD;aly−/− testes appear to reach the differentiation stage at which Pros turned on in the kmg KD germ cells (fig. S13 and supplementary text). Assessment by means of quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) revealed that misexpression of five out of five transcripts in kmg KD testes also required function of Aly (fig. S12G). Global transcriptome analysis via microarray of kmg KD versus kmg KD;aly−/− testes showed that the majority of the 440 genes that were derepressed because of loss of function of kmg in spermatocytes were no longer abnormally up-regulated in kmg KD;aly−/− testes (Fig. 5C). Even genes without noticeable binding of Aly at their cryptic promoters were suppressed in kmg KD;aly−/−, suggesting that Aly may regulate this group of genes indirectly.

Fig. 5 Aly is required for misexpression of aberrant transcripts in kmg KD testes.

(A and B) Immunofluorescence images of (A) kmg KD and (B) kmg KD;aly−/− testes stained for Vasa (red) and Pros (light blue). Scale bars, 100 μm. (C) Box plot of expression of 440 somatic transcripts derepressed in kmg KD testes, showing transcript levels in kmg sibling control (no Gal4 driver), kmg KD, and kmg KD;aly−/− testes. Whiskers indicate the most extreme data points, excluding outliers.

Together, our ChIP and RNA-seq data show that Kmg and dMi-2 bind actively transcribed genes (Fig. 3E and fig. S7) (14) but are required to block expression of aberrant transcripts from other genes that are normally silent in testes. The mammalian ortholog of dMi-2, CHD4 (Mi-2β), has been shown to bind active genes in mouse embryonic stem cells (15) or T lymphocyte precursors (16) but also plays a role in ensuring lineage-specific gene expression in other contexts (17, 18). We cannot rule out that Kmg and dMi-2 might also act directly at the cryptic promoter sites but that our ChIP conditions did not capture their transient or dynamic binding because several chromatin remodelers or transcription factors, such as the thyroid hormone receptor, have been difficult to detect with ChIP (19, 20). Kmg and dMi-2 may repress misexpression from cryptic promoters indirectly by activating as-yet-unidentified repressor proteins. However, it is also possible that Kmg and dMi-2 act at a distance by modulating chromatin structure or confining transcriptional initiation or elongation licensing machinery to normally active genes.

Changes in the genomic localization of Aly protein in wild-type versus kmg KD testes raised the possibility that Kmg may in part prevent misexpression from cryptic promoters by concentrating Aly at active genes. Of the 1903 Aly peaks identified with ChIP from wild-type testes, the 248 Aly peaks that overlapped with strong Kmg peaks showed via ChIP an overall reduction in enrichment of Aly from kmg KD testes as compared with wild type (Fig. 6, A to C, case 1, and fig. S14, A and B). In contrast, the Aly peaks at cryptic promoters were more robust in kmg KD testes than in wild type (Fig. 4G). In general, over the genome 4129 new Aly peaks were identified by means of ChIP from kmg KD testes that were absent or did not pass the statistical cutoff in wild-type testes (Fig. 6, A to C, case 2, and fig. S14A). More than 30% of the genomic regions with new Aly peaks in kmg KD showed elevated levels of RNA expression starting at or near the Aly peak in kmg KD but not in wild-type testes (Fig. 6D and fig. S14C), suggesting that misexpression of transcripts from normally silent promoters in kmg KD testes is more widespread than initially assessed with microarray. Together, these findings raise the possibility that Kmg may prevent misexpression of aberrant transcript by concentrating Aly to active target genes in wild-type testes, preventing binding and action of Aly at cryptic promoter sites.

Fig. 6 Kmg prevents promiscuous activity of Aly.

(A) Genome browser screenshot showing ChIP-seq results for Kmg and Aly in control and kmg KD testes and RNA-seq results from wild-type testes. y axes are normalized read counts based on 1 million mapped reads per sample. (B and C) Median profile of (B) Aly and (C) Kmg ChIP (solid lines) and corresponding input (dotted lines) signals centered around (case 1, left) Aly peaks identified in wild-type testes (q < 10−10 and identified in both replicates) that overlap with Kmg peaks, and (case 2, right) new Aly peaks identified in kmg KD testes (q < 10−10 and identified in both replicates) that were not detected in wild-type testes. For the 248 Aly peaks in case 1—because these peaks were present at the promoters of genes with known strand information—read counts were plotted according to the direction of transcription from 5′ to 3′. (D) Heatmap representation of normalized RNA-seq read counts centered around 4219 new Aly peaks that appeared in kmg KD (case 2). Darkest (black) color indicates read count value at the 5th percentile. Brightest [yellow for reads mapped to Watson (+), light blue for Crick (–) strands] colors indicate values at the 95th percentile among all values in kmg KD.

Our results suggest that selective gene activation is not always mediated by a precise transcriptional activator but can instead be directed by combination of a promiscuous activator and a gene-selective licensing mechanism (fig. S15A). Cryptic promoters may become accessible as chromatin organization is reshaped to allow expression of terminal differentiation transcripts that were tightly repressed in the progenitor state. We posit that this chromatin organization makes a number of sites that are accessible for transcription dependent on the testis-specific tMAC complex component Aly. In this context, activity of Kmg and dMi-2 is required to prevent productive transcript formation from unwanted initiation sites, potentially by confining Aly to genes actively transcribed in the testis and limiting the amount of Aly protein acting at cryptic promoters.

The initiation of transcripts from cryptic promoters is reminiscent of loss of function of Ikaros, a critical regulator of T and B cell differentiation (21) and a tumor suppressor in the lymphocyte lineage (22, 23). Like Kmg, Ikaros is a multiple–zinc finger protein associated with Mi-2β, which binds to active genes in T and B cell precursors (16, 24). In T cell lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) associated with loss of function of Ikaros, cryptic intragenic promoters were activated, leading to expression of ligand-independent Notch1 protein, contributing to leukemogenesis (25). Thus, in addition to being detrimental for proper differentiation, firing of abnormal transcripts from normally cryptic promoters because of defects in chromatin regulators may contribute to tumorigenesis through generation of oncogenic proteins.

Supplementary Materials

www.sciencemag.org/content/356/6339/717/suppl/DC1

Materials and Methods

Supplementary Text

Figs. S1 to S15

Tables S1 to S8

References (2854)

References and Notes

Acknowledgments: We thank L. Di Stefano, H. White-Cooper, X. Chen, F. Port, S. Bullock, A. Kuo, G. Crabtree, S. Park, S. Kim, J. Wysocka, and G. Ramaswami for advice and generously sharing data and reagents; members of the Fuller laboratory for discussions and critical reading of the manuscript; the Stanford Cell Sciences Imaging Facility for fluorescence microscopy (National Center for Research Resources grants S10RR017959-01 and 1S10OD010580); and the Stanford Functional Genomics Facility for high-throughput sequencing. Genomic data are available under the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE89506). J.K. was supported by the Anne T. and Robert M. Bass Stanford Graduate Fellowship and the Bruce and Elizabeth Dunlevie Bio-X Stanford Interdisciplinary Graduate Fellowship. Research support was provided by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grant TRR81 to A.B. and S.A., Kempkes Stiftung to S.A, NIH grant 5R01GM061986, and the Reed-Hodgson Professorship in Human Biology to M.T.F.
View Abstract

Navigate This Article