Feature

The metawars

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  21 Sep 2018:
Vol. 361, Issue 6408, pp. 1184-1188
DOI: 10.1126/science.361.6408.1184

You are currently viewing the summary.

View Full Text

Log in to view the full text

Log in through your institution

Log in through your institution

Summary

The number of meta-analyses has exploded the past decade; some 11,000 were published in 2017. The studies, which extract and weigh data from a number of primary studies, have become widely accepted as a standardized, less biased way to answer scientific questions; they are sometimes called the "platinum standard" of evidence and guide thousands of treatment guidelines and social policies. But many meta-analyses aren't the debate enders scientists hoped they would be; often they don't bring clarity but cause more controversy instead. One reason is that, although the basic rules of the meta-analysis are simple, researchers must make many choices along the way, allowing conscious or unconscious biases to creep in.