In DepthBioethics

Shock greets claim of CRISPR-edited babies

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  30 Nov 2018:
Vol. 362, Issue 6418, pp. 978-979
DOI: 10.1126/science.362.6418.978

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed.  Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

  • RE: Edited implanted embryos
    • Paul Joseph Watson, Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology / evolutionary Psychology, University of New Mexico

    In my opinion it is a foregone conclusion that humans will be "enhancing" themselves and their offspring via genetic editing. It is in our nature, and the evidence for this view seems to be mounting. Debate the bioethics of it and agree on regulations all you want. Impose your conclusions, if we can ever come to any, on humanity. I'm guessing it will not matter much in the end. You'll still have a frenzy of editing taking place, unless the above-mentioned imposition is incredibly brutal.

    But here is an idea about this phenomena anyway. It is about making the best of the oncoming genetic editing juggernaut.

    Note: In the lists of traits people are interested in editing away, you never see our greatest pan-human genetic disease. We all share it, with very minor variation, since we all are products of natural selection. Simply put, that disease is insufficient compassion, prosociality, and biophilia to make us a sustainable species.

    Of course we currently know little or nothing about what cocktail of genetic edits that, probably along with education, would give people the cognitive capacity to appreciate one another and wild nature enough to sustain the amazing human experiment and an appreciable proportion of the other miraculous evolutionary experiments happening our tiny earth. That already says a lot about us. Our brains have been designed by natural selection to crave, like we crave sugar and fat, edits that increase our survival a...

    Show More
    Competing Interests: None declared.