RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics JF Science JO Science FD American Association for the Advancement of Science SP aaf0918 DO 10.1126/science.aaf0918 A1 Camerer, Colin F. A1 Dreber, Anna A1 Forsell, Eskil A1 Ho, Teck-Hua A1 Huber, Jürgen A1 Johannesson, Magnus A1 Kirchler, Michael A1 Almenberg, Johan A1 Altmejd, Adam A1 Chan, Taizan A1 Heikensten, Emma A1 Holzmeister, Felix A1 Imai, Taisuke A1 Isaksson, Siri A1 Nave, Gideon A1 Pfeiffer, Thomas A1 Razen, Michael A1 Wu, Hang YR 2016 UL http://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2016/03/02/science.aaf0918.abstract AB The reproducibility of scientific findings has been called into question. To contribute data about reproducibility in economics, we replicate 18 studies published in the American Economic Review and the Quarterly Journal of Economics in 2011-2014. All replications follow predefined analysis plans publicly posted prior to the replications, and have a statistical power of at least 90% to detect the original effect size at the 5% significance level. We find a significant effect in the same direction as the original study for 11 replications (61%); on average the replicated effect size is 66% of the original. The reproducibility rate varies between 67% and 78% for four additional reproducibility indicators, including a prediction market measure of peer beliefs.