PerspectiveEcology

Receding Forest Edges and Vanishing Reserves

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  26 May 2000:
Vol. 288, Issue 5470, pp. 1356-1358
DOI: 10.1126/science.288.5470.1356

Logging and road building carve up otherwise intact expanses of forest into small and isolated islands (forest fragmentation), creating a perimeter of abrupt forest edge where ecological changes take place (1). Edge effects in fragments of tropical forest are widespread and complex (1, 2). They have been treated as static phenomena, that is, as a fixed function of edge distance. This has resulted in simplistic landscape management guidelines such as the creation of buffer zones around parks and reserves (3). However, recent research (4) suggests that many tropical landscapes are increasingly experiencing conditions hostile to forest regeneration, including intrusion by fire into areas with a historically low incidence of burning. Furthermore, natural phenomena such as El Niño events act synergistically to magnify the deleterious effects of human disturbance (5). This combination of factors is posing a much more serious threat to forest remnants than previously imagined because forest edges are gradually receding, diminishing the size of fragments and ultimately causing them to collapse inwards. The implications for tropical landscape planning and conservation are far-reaching.

In the first few years, the forest edge allows sunlight and wind to penetrate laterally into the forest fragment (see the figure, immediately below), resulting in microclimatic changes along a wide band of adjacent forest (6). These changes in turn immediately affect forest structure, leaf fall, turnover in the plant community, seedling recruitment patterns, and distribution of animals (7, 8). Soon tree mortality increases dramatically near the forest edge (2). In the first decade following fragmentation, there is a shift in the arboreal vegetation from climax to pioneer species (that is, a change from tree species characteristic of old-growth to those associated with young, regenerating forests) as conditions favor pioneer life histories (9). Thereafter, the structure of the forest edge changes significantly. In the central Amazon, “closing” of the edge through forest regeneration and primary forest understory growth (10) may act as a buffer against the original edge-induced temperature increases and humidity declines (7) (see the figure, immediately below).

The death of a forest.

Forest edges at three different stages after isolation. (A) Recent cutover area shows abrupt forest edge subjected to lateral winds and light penetration that allows for significant microclimatic changes inside the forest edge. (B) After several years of isolation, regenerating vegetation is found along the forest border and in the understory, closing the edge. In a landscape with low matrix harshness, this edge will be maintained (and could expand outward), buffering the forest interior from the severity of the initial edge effects. (C) In landscapes with high matrix harshness, the process of forest regeneration along the edge breaks down, resulting in greater penetration of edge effects and a gradually receding edge. The original edge will be replaced by scrubby ruderal vegetation, eventually leading to vanishing reserves.

The distance over which different types of plants and animals or other response variables are affected within a fragment can be important (1, 11, 12). Edge-affected zones as wide as 1 km are not uncommon, and most plant and animal species show detectable impacts up to 100 to 300 m from the forest edge (13). This scale of edge effect implies that fragments up to 1000 hectares will be composed almost entirely of edge-affected habitat (14). In at least one case, edge effects on seedling recruitment permeated a 90,000 hectare tropical rainforest in Borneo (15).

The ability of the regenerating forest along a fragment's edge to act as a buffer will depend on the “harshness” of the matrix, harshness being defined as the ability of the matrix to degrade the primary forest. (The matrix refers to the intervening variety of habitats in a landscape that surround forest patches). In areas with low matrix harshness, most edge effects will either remain stable over time or decrease as vegetation regenerates along a fragment's edge. In such cases, normal forest succession occurring at the edge may at least achieve a balance between exposure and regeneration, where the interior of the fragment is buffered and retains most of its primary forest character (7, 8).

Some tropical areas have more severe conditions in the matrix. For example, in the Atlantic Forest of southern Brazil fragments are embedded in huge expanses of sugar cane and Eucalyptus plantations where burning and the application of herbicides are routine procedures. The sustainability of such fragments is at risk because the forest is unable to regenerate at the edge or to buffer its interior (9). The result is a pronounced impoverishment (mortality higher than recruitment) of the remaining primary forest interior, with the edge being dominated by a species-poor transition community or weedy vegetation (16, 17).

In the tropics, the most important determinants of matrix harshness are intensity and history of land use, incidence of fire, introduction of exotic species, and the structure of the matrix vegetation. Fire has played a major role in compounding the impacts of deforestation in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest (18). As Cochrane et al. (4) have recently shown, fire is also becoming an important element in Amazonian landscapes through a positive-feedback loop in which recently burned forest becomes much more susceptible to subsequent fires. Fire has a devastating impact on woody plants in wet forests because most tropical tree species have thin bark that makes their stems susceptible to even light surface fires, and they have no underground buds from which to resprout (19).

The increased incidence of accidental and managed burns dramatically affects regeneration along forest edges, resetting succession to time zero (20). Fire also plays an important part in determining the structure and composition of the matrix vegetation (16, 21), which in turn affects tree mortality along fragment edges (22). Worse still, where the edge acts as a conduit to carry fire into the margins of the primary forest, the regenerating forest subsequently proceeds inward, providing a broader band of vegetation susceptible to future incursions of fire (4). Thus, the increased incidence of fire in the Amazon landscape may be sufficient to change regeneration at forest edges into degeneration (from B to C in figure), eventually leading to receding edges and the potential for vanishing fragments.

Increased fire incidence also influences species composition of the regenerating forest in the matrix or along the fragment edge. Here, primary species are replaced by pioneer species that in turn may be eliminated and replaced by exotic or ruderal species, which are more resilient to fire (9, 23). In old fragmented landscapes such as the Atlantic forest of Brazil, native tree genera will be replaced by fire-adapted, nonnative shrubs and herbs such as Lantana, Mimosa, Stachytarpheta, Borreria, Lygodium, and Hedychium, as well as fire-adapted grasses. In the Amazon region, where exotics are not as common, tree genera from pioneer-dominated families such as Annonaceae, Cecropiaceae, Clusiaceae, Euphorbiaceae, and Malpighiaceae are favored in the regeneration occurring in cutover (deforested areas) and edge habitat. Exotic animals, such as pigs and Africanized honeybees, as well as plants can cause large-scale damage, resulting in ecological displacement of the native species (24). Although invasive species have received much attention in general, their potential importance in fragmented forest landscapes has so far been overlooked. Their success in Hawaii and South Florida bodes poorly for the future of other tropical forests as they become fragmented and exposed to increasing numbers of invasive species.

The field of wildlife management and conservation was born in temperate countries where the maintenance and expansion of forest edges was interpreted as beneficial for game populations and included the prescription of periodic burnings (25). As applied to tropical countries, studies regarding reserve design were the first to address the issue of edges in the planning of protected areas (3), but they largely regarded them as spatially fixed. It is now evident that forest edges should be viewed as a dynamic component of the landscape. Even conventional management guidelines providing buffer zones around protected areas may not, as such, suffice in countering the dynamic nature of forest edges. In order to minimize the foreseeable collapse of many isolated protected areas (9, 26), a landscape-scale conservation strategy is needed. This strategy requires conservationists to

1) maximize the area/perimeter relationship of conservation areas by protecting large forest remnants rather than small ones where possible; by rebuilding connectivity among small adjacent protected areas by setting aside intervening habitat and promoting reforestation of the landscape; and by minimizing perimeter increases due to irregularity in reserve shape;

2) protect the forest edge itself against structural damage, incursion by fire, and colonization by exotics, through leaving a natural buffer zone of forest that could be managed to resemble a natural ecotone (transition from forest to field) rather than an abrupt edge;

3) minimize the harshness of the adjacent matrix by diversifying and promoting less intensive types of land use, controlling the use of fire, minimizing the application of toxic chemicals, and controlling the introduction of exotic plant species.

These objectives are crucial for most postfrontier tropical forest regions (such as, the Atlantic Forest of Brazil, the Philippines and Madagascar), where the landscape is highly fragmented with little or no connectivity between forest remnants. These regions show a size distribution that is highly skewed in favor of forest fragments of smaller size; smaller forest fragments represent a large proportion of the remaining forest in these areas (see figure, immediately below). For instance, in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil, the average size of restricted use, protected areas is a mere 9210 hectares, and a significant proportion of the total area and number of remnants are in the small size classes. Even in regions such as the Amazon forest, the deforestation frontier leaves a highly fragmented landscape in its wake (5, 12). Further thwarting conservation efforts are the raging fires that have become epidemic during the dry season, and many parks have experienced repeated incursions by wildfires (18).

The diminution of fragments.

Number and total area of forest fragments in each size class in different tropical regions. Green bars represent the number of fragments and red bars the total area. Pale colors denote the three smaller size classes that are facing serious and immediate risk of receding edges. [Data sources are (A) C. Jenkins, personal communication; (B) Conservation International do Brasil & Sociedade Civil Mamiráu. Banco de dados das unidades de conservaçäo do Brasil. Conservation International do Brasil, Belo Horizonte, MG (1997); (C) M. K. Steinenger et al., Conserv. Biol. (in press); (D) Forest Cover and Protected Areas, WCMC Global Overview of Forest Conservation (1998)].

Given current knowledge about edge effects, coupled with increasing matrix harshness, we believe that small fragments (<5000 hectares) in most tropical regions are in serious and immediate danger of suffering the receding edge phenomenon. If so, a large proportion of forest remnants in fragmented landscapes that are already protected or available for conservation are doomed to disappear without proper management. Clearly, the future of these reserves demands active and costly management commensurate with the preservation of the last vestiges of tropical ecosystems.

Preemptive planning is necessary to implement conservation on regional and global scales, where such opportunities still exist. For frontier tropical wilderness areas, the recognition of the dynamic nature of edges demands that conservation planning rapidly migrate to the landscape scale (27). This approach is exemplified by the proposed large-scale biodiversity corridors of the Brazilian rainforests (28) and the Mesoamerican corridor (29). Only through such measures will there be any hope of conserving tropical landscapes and saving forest fragments from a vanishing future.

References

View Abstract

Navigate This Article