PerspectiveNeurobiology

Learning More About NMDA Receptor Regulation

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  18 Jan 2002:
Vol. 295, Issue 5554, pp. 449-451
DOI: 10.1126/science.1069391

Of all the neurotransmitter receptors in the brain, the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) subtype of glutamate receptor has an unmatched hold on the imagination of neuroscientists. The secret of the NMDA receptor's enduring appeal is its crucial involvement in regulating changes in the strength of synapses, the regions where neurons communicate. Such changes in synaptic strength (synaptic plasticity) are believed to underlie learning and memory. The NMDA receptor is a multimeric protein complex localized in the membranes of postsynaptic neurons. It consists of an NR1 subunit and one or more NR2 subunits, which form a channel that is permeable to calcium ions. The defining feature of the NMDA receptor is that it allows calcium ions to flow into the postsynaptic neuron when the neurotransmitter glutamate is released into the synapse. An increase in the calcium ion concentration of the postsynapatic neuron triggers a series of biochemical changes that result in modulation of synaptic strength. Despite the fact that the NMDA receptor is a central player in synaptic plasticity, surprisingly little is known about the way in which NMDA receptor-mediated calcium influx is regulated. Reporting on page 491 of this week's Science (1) and in a recent issue of Neuron (2, 3), the Greenberg, Klein, and Pawson groups shed light on how this NMDA receptor-mediated postsynaptic calcium influx is regulated. Using developing cortical neurons, Takasu et al. (1) show that regulation depends on the Eph receptor tyrosine kinase. Meanwhile, the Neuron papers (2, 3) provide in vivo evidence for the involvement of Eph receptors in synaptic plasticity.

Eph receptors are a large family of receptor tyrosine kinases that regulate various developmental events including cell migration, axon guidance, and regionalization of the nervous system (4). There are two classes of Eph receptors, EphA and EphB, which are selectively activated by ephrinA and ephrinB ligands, respectively. EphrinA ligands are attached to the membrane through a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol linkage, and ephrinB ligands are transmembrane proteins. The binding of ephrinB to the EphB receptor is particularly interesting because it leads to tyrosine phosphorylation not only of the receptor, but also of the cytoplasmic domain of the ephrinB ligand itself. Bidirectional signaling through ephrinB ligands and the EphB2 receptor is important for regulating interactions between axons and their cellular targets in the mammalian embryo (4).

The possibility that ephrinB-EphB2 receptor interactions might regulate synaptic strength was first suggested by the observation that EphB receptors are found on postsynaptic membranes (5). Greenberg's group has shown that ephrinB1 induces the association of EphB2 receptors with the NR1 subunit of NMDA receptors (6). These investigators have also demonstrated that ephrinB1 causes NR1 subunits to cluster at postsynaptic sites. This suggested that the ephrinB1 present in the neuronal membranes of axon terminals might induce the maturation of glutamatergic synapses by promoting aggregation of NMDA receptors in postsynaptic membranes.

Now, Takasu and colleagues (1) extend these observations by revealing that activation of the EphB receptor and its signaling pathway greatly potentiates glutamate-induced calcium influx through the NMDA receptor. In addition, they show that NMDA receptor-induced phosphorylation of the transcription factor CREB and expression of its target genes are also markedly enhanced by EphB2 receptor activation and signaling. Because NMDA receptor-induced calcium influx and altered gene expression are crucial for inducing long-term changes in synaptic strength, regulation of NMDA receptor activity by Eph receptor signaling may influence synaptic plasticity.

Takasu and colleagues also investigated how EphB receptors might modulate NMDA receptor activity. Stimulating cortical neurons with ephrinB2 resulted in tyrosine phosphorylation of the NR2B subunit at three tyrosine residues. They report that ephrinB2-induced potentiation of calcium influx through NMDA receptors, as well as tyrosine phosphorylation of NR2B, requires the cytoplasmic (kinase) domain of the EphB2 receptor. Tyrosine phosphorylation of NR2B appears to be necessary for ephrinB2 to modulate NMDA receptor activity, because a mutant form of NR2B in which the three tyrosine residues cannot be phosphorylated prevents calcium influx in response to EphB signaling.

It appears that the effects of EphB2 signaling on NMDA receptor activity are mediated by a Src family tyrosine kinase. A Src tyrosine kinase called Fyn is known to phosphorylate the NR2B subunit of the NMDA receptor (7). Takasu et al. show that ephrinB2 stimulation of cortical neurons leads to phosphorylation of Src and its association with the EphB2 receptor (see the figure). Also, a dominant negative Src construct (which inhibits multiple Src family kinases) suppresses ephrinB2-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of NR2B and inhibits the potentiation of NMDA receptor-mediated calcium influx. Grunwald et al. (2) also provide evidence for Src activation and tyrosine phosphorylation of a different NMDA receptor subunit (NR2A) by EphB2 signaling (2). These observations suggest that ephrin ligands activate EphB2 receptors on the postsynaptic membrane, which leads to recruitment of a Src family kinase to the EphB2 receptor. The Src family kinase, in turn, phosphorylates one or more NR2 subunits, and this posttranslational modification leads to increased calcium permeability of the NMDA receptor (see the figure). In this way, ephrinB signaling could exert a marked influence on synaptic plasticity at glutamatergic synapses.

Two receptors are better than one.

Activation of the EphB receptor and its signal transduction pathway regulates NMDA receptor activity. When activated by binding of its ligand, ephrinB2, the EphB receptor recruits a Src family kinase, which phosphorylates three of the tyrosines in a subunit of the NMDA receptor. This leads to increased calcium permeability of the NMDA receptor, the influx of calcium ions into the postsynaptic neuron, and alterations in synaptic plasticity.

The Grunwald et al. (2) and Henderson et al. (3) papers provide in vivo evidence that the EphB2 receptors are involved in synaptic plasticity. Both groups report that synaptic plasticity is compromised in mice that lack the ephB2 gene, although the studies differ in some important respects. Henderson et al. (3) report that synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus is reduced at both CA1 and dentate gyrus synapses in ephB2-deficient mice. They also found that NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic currents in hippocampal granule cells are reduced in the mutant mice. Grunwald et al. (2) also report a reduction in synaptic plasticity at CA1 synapses, but they did not observe differences in NMDA receptor-mediated currents in CA1 neurons. Thus, it is not yet clear whether altered plasticity in ephB2-deficient mice can be entirely explained by changes in NMDA receptor activity. Although this is an important issue that needs to be resolved, the studies agree on the principal conclusion that EphB2 receptors contribute to hippocampal synaptic plasticity.

Together the studies from the Greenberg, Klein, and Pawson laboratories (1-3) strongly suggest that EphB2 receptors can modulate NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic plasticity, but several mechanistic details are not yet resolved. Perhaps the most surprising finding is that of the Klein and Pawson groups (2, 3), who report that the in vivo deficits in ephB2-deficient mice can be rescued by overexpressing an EphB2 receptor that lacks the cytoplasmic domain. At first glance, this appears to be at odds with the observation from the Greenberg group that EphB receptor-induced potentiation of NMDA receptor activity requires the cytoplasmic domain of the EphB receptor. But the Greenberg lab had previously shown that EphB2 receptors induce NMDA receptor clustering in neurons, and that this effect does not require the EphB receptor's cytoplasmic domain (6). Therefore, one possible explanation is that the in vivo deficits in synaptic plasticity are principally due to lack of proper clustering of NMDA receptors at the synapse. This further underscores the importance of determining whether the localization and function of NMDA receptors are affected in ephB2-deficient mice, and whether that can explain the observed effects on synaptic plasticity.

One of the most interesting implications of the Greenberg study (1) is that EphB2 receptor signaling can acutely influence NMDA receptor activity. It will be important to further examine this possibility in vivo, both in the context of developmental maturation and adult synaptic plasticity. It should be determined whether NMDA receptor-mediated calcium influx is reduced in ephB2-deficient mice, and whether the effects of EphB2 signaling on NMDA receptor clustering and calcium permeability can be mechanistically separated by genetic manipulation. It would also be interesting to know whether the effects of EphB signaling on the NMDA receptor are partly regulated by insertion of NMDA receptors into the postsynaptic membrane, which is one way in which glutamate receptor activity is modulated. Addressing these questions should provide important insights into the link between EphB receptor signaling and NMDA receptor activity, simultaneously enhancing our understanding of the molecular basis of synaptic plasticity.

References

View Abstract

Navigate This Article