Capturing Chromosome Conformation

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  15 Feb 2002:
Vol. 295, Issue 5558, pp. 1306-1311
DOI: 10.1126/science.1067799


We describe an approach to detect the frequency of interaction between any two genomic loci. Generation of a matrix of interaction frequencies between sites on the same or different chromosomes reveals their relative spatial disposition and provides information about the physical properties of the chromatin fiber. This methodology can be applied to the spatial organization of entire genomes in organisms from bacteria to human. Using the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we could confirm known qualitative features of chromosome organization within the nucleus and dynamic changes in that organization during meiosis. We also analyzed yeast chromosome III at the G1stage of the cell cycle. We found that chromatin is highly flexible throughout. Furthermore, functionally distinct AT- and GC-rich domains were found to exhibit different conformations, and a population-average 3D model of chromosome III could be determined. Chromosome III emerges as a contorted ring.

Important chromosomal activities have been linked with both structural properties and spatial conformations of chromosomes. Local properties of the chromatin fiber influence gene expression, origin firing, and DNA repair [e.g., (1, 2)]. Higher order structural features—such as formation of the 30-nm fiber, chromatin loops and axes, and interchromosomal connections—are important for chromosome morphogenesis and also have roles in gene expression and recombination. Activities such as transcription and timing of replication have been related to overall spatial nuclear disposition of different regions and their relationships to the nuclear envelope [e.g., (3–6)]. At each of these levels, chromosome organization is highly dynamic, varying both during the cell cycle and among different cell types.

Analysis of chromosome conformation is complicated by technical limitations. Electron microscopy, while affording high resolution, is laborious and not easily applicable to studies of specific loci. Light microscopy affords a resolution of 100 to 200 nm at best, which is insufficient to define chromosome conformation. DNA binding proteins fused to green fluorescent protein permit visualization of individual loci, but only a few positions can be examined simultaneously. Multiple loci can be visualized with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), but this requires severe treatment that may affect chromosome organization.

We developed a high-throughput methodology, Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C), which can be used to analyze the overall spatial organization of chromosomes and to investigate their physical properties at high resolution. The principle of our approach is outlined in Fig. 1A (7). Intact nuclei are isolated (8) and subjected to formaldehyde fixation, which cross-links proteins to other proteins and to DNA. The overall result is cross-linking of physically touching segments throughout the genome via contacts between their DNA-bound proteins. The relative frequencies with which different sites have become cross-linked are then determined. Analysis of genome-wide interaction frequencies provides information about general nuclear organization as well as physical properties and conformations of chromosomes. We have used intact yeast nuclei for all experiments. Although the method can be performed using intact cells, the signals are considerably lower, making quantification difficult (9). The general nuclear organization of purified nuclei is largely intact, as shown below.

Figure 1

The Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) methodology. (A) Schematic representation of the assay: formaldehyde cross-linking, Eco RI digestion, intramolecular ligation, and PCR-mediated detection of ligation products after reversal of the cross-links. The asterisk indicates the newly formed restriction site. (B) Determination of the cross-linking frequency of two loci. The linear range for the quantitative PCR reactions was determined by titrating the cross-linked and control templates, and the products were run on agarose gels. The graphs show the quantitation of PCR product that was obtained with primer pair 5+6 (solid circles) and primer pair 6+13 (open circles) [see (C)]. PCR product formation was linear up to 0.15 μg of cross-linked template and up to 0.4 μg of the control template. In all subsequent experiments, 35 ng of cross-linked template and 150 ng of control template were used. (C) Lower panel: Positions of 13 primers along chromosome III that are used in this study. The open circle indicates the centromere; arrowheads indicate the telomeres. Upper panel: Control experiments. Primer pairs 5+6 and 6+13 were used to detect ligation products on various templates. Similar amounts of ligation products were detected when the control template was used (lane 1). No PCR products were obtained on any of the templates when the ligation step was omitted (lanes 2 to 8). Treating purified genomic DNA with formaldehyde before digestion followed by dilution and ligation did not result in increased ligation product formation (lanes 9 and 10). Using nuclei, no random intermolecular ligation products were detected (lane 11), because no products were detected when the formaldehyde treatment was left out (44). Ligation product formation increased linearly with formaldehyde concentration (lanes 12 to 15). In all other experiments, 1% formaldehyde was used. (D) The method was applied to nuclei isolated from an exponentially growing haploid culture. The cross-linking frequency of the centromere (primer 6, lanes 1 to 12) and the left telomere (primer 1, lanes 13 to 24) with the 12 other sites along chromosome III was determined and plotted. A schematic representation of chromosome III is indicated in which the gray vertical bars represent the position of either the centromere or the left telomere.

For quantification of cross-linking frequencies, cross-linked DNA is digested with a restriction enzyme and then subjected to ligation at very low DNA concentration. Under such conditions, ligation of cross-linked fragments, which is intramolecular, is strongly favored over ligation of random fragments, which is intermolecular. Cross-linking is then reversed and individual ligation products are detected and quantified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using locus-specific primers. Control template is generated in which all possible ligation products are present in equal abundance (7). The cross-linking frequency (X) of two specific loci is determined by quantitative PCR reactions using control and cross-linked templates, and X is expressed as the ratio of the amount of product obtained using the cross-linked template to the amount of product obtained with the control template (Fig. 1B).X should be directly proportional to the frequency with which the two corresponding genomic sites interact (10).

Control experiments show that formation of ligation products is strictly dependent on both ligation and cross-linking (Fig. 1C). In general, X decreases with increasing separation distance in kb along chromosome III (“genomic site separation”). Cross-linking frequencies for both the left telomere and the centromere of chromosome III with each of 12 other positions along that same chromosome (Fig. 1, C and D) were determined using nuclei isolated from exponentially growing haploid cells. Interestingly, the two telomeres of chromosome III interact more frequently than predicted from their genomic site separation, which suggests that the chromosome ends are in close spatial proximity. This is expected because yeast telomeres are known to occur in clusters (11, 12).

We next applied our method to an analysis of centromeres and of homologous chromosomes (“homologs”) during meiosis in yeast (7). In mitotic and premeiotic cells, centromeres are clustered near the spindle pole body (13, 14) and homologous chromosomes are loosely associated (15–17). These features change markedly when cells enter meiosis (13). The centromere cluster is rapidly lost and is not restored until just before the first meiotic division. Loose interactions between homologs are transiently lost during S phase, but are immediately restored and then become increasingly robust during prophase when synaptonemal complex is formed [reviewed in (18, 19)].

Centromere relationships were probed by analyzing the frequencies with which the centromere of chromosome IV (CEN4) became cross-linked to each of 10 sites along the length of chromosome III. In premeiotic cells, CEN4 interacted strongly only with the chromosome III centromere (CEN3; primer pair 6+14, Fig. 2A). Identical results were obtained in exponentially growing diploid cells and in both MAT a and MATα haploid cells (9). In contrast, at 4 and 5 hours after the onset of meiosis, the interaction frequency between the two centromeres was reduced by a factor of 4 to 5 (Fig. 2A), in good agreement with the timing and extent of reduction observed in cytological studies (12, 14). Interactions between CEN4 and sites on chromosome III distant from CEN3 were little or not at all reduced. A low frequency of centromere interactions was still observed at the later time points. This signal likely represents the 10 to 15% of cells that typically fail to enter meiosis in such experiments (20).

Figure 2

Analysis of nuclear dynamics during meiosis. (A) Loss of centromere clustering during meiosis. Nuclei were isolated at 0, 4, and 5 hours after induction of meiosis (7). Eco RI was used to generate cross-linked and control templates. Primer 14 was specific for the Eco RI fragment containing CEN4. The cross-linking frequency of CEN4 with 10 positions along chromosome III was determined (lanes 1 to 10). Cross-linking frequencies were determined in triplicate; the average and standard error of the mean are plotted in the graph. Chromosome III is schematically depicted at the top to indicate the position of CEN3. (B) Upper panel: Schematic representation of the left arm of chromosome III and the right arm of chromosome VI. The open circles indicate the centromeres; arrowheads indicate the telomeres. Small vertical bars indicate Xho I sites. Arrows indicate the positions of the primers (15 to 21) used to detect chromosomal interactions. The Xho I restriction fragment length polymorphism on the left arm of chromosome III contains the HIS4LEU2 hotspot [indicated by the dashed line (21)]. Lower panels: Interactions between homologous and nonhomologous chromosomes were analyzed with the same nuclei preparations as used for the experiment shown in (A), but here Xho I was used to generate cross-linked and control templates. Interactions between allelic sites were analyzed using primers 15 and 17 and primers 16 and 18 (lower left, lanes 1 and 5). Interactions between chromosome III and VI were studied using primers 15 and 16 in combination with primers 19, 20, and 21 (lanes 2 to 4 and 6 to 8). Cross-linking frequencies were determined in triplicate, and the average and standard error of the mean are plotted over time (lower right). Only two of the six nonhomologous interactions are plotted; the other four were similar to the ones graphed and are not plotted.

Relationships between homologs were analyzed using maternal and paternal versions of chromosome III marked differentially with Xho I restriction site polymorphisms that flank a meiotic recombination hotspot (HIS4LEU2) (21). This hotspot is located in the middle of the 106-kb left arm (Fig. 2B). Cross-linking and ligation of the Xho I hot- spot fragments from the two homologs yields unique ligation products that are not formed after ligation of fragments from sister chromatids. As a control, we analyzed nonhomologous interactions between each of the chromosome III hotspot fragments and analogously positioned sites on chromosome VI. The latter sites were located in the middle of the chromosome VI right arm, which is also ∼100 kb. As a result, in the control experiment, homologous and nonhomologous interactions should be closely similar with respect to juxtaposition mediated by clustering of telomeres or centromeres.

The level of homologous interactions was low in premeiotic cells (Fig. 2B, lanes 1 and 5) but increased by a factor of ∼10 after 4 and 5 hours, times at which homologs are known to be maximally juxtaposed (20, 21). In contrast, nonhomologous interactions were infrequent in premeiotic cells and did not increase during meiosis (Fig. 2B, lanes 2 to 4 and 6 to 8). Interestingly, even in premeiotic cells homologous interactions were slightly more frequent than nonhomologous interactions, consistent with the loose pairing of homologs detected at this stage by FISH (15–17).

These observations demonstrate that the 3C assay reliably detects important qualitative features of chromosome organization. In addition, these results suggest that nuclear organization is not markedly affected during nuclei purification.

The 3C assay also permits detailed quantitative analysis of chromosome structure. The spatial disposition of the chromatin fiber is determined by its flexibility and by additional constraints on its path. These parameters together determine the interaction frequencies of different sites. When a large number of cross-linking frequencies is determined, the relationship between cross-linking frequency and genomic site separation can be interpreted using polymer models that describe this relationship in terms of flexibility and other structural parameters that relate to chromosome conformation (22–26).

The cross-linking frequency between two loci of the chromosome with a site separation distance s (in kb),X(s), is directly proportional to the local concentrationj M(s), which is the concentration of one site of the polymer in proximity to the other site (26):Embedded Image(1)The proportionality constant k reflects the efficiency of the cross-linking reaction and can slightly vary from experiment to experiment. Within a given experiment, variation ink can reflect real local differences in susceptibility to cross-linking.

The value of j M(s) can be expressed in terms of two key parameters, l andc, by a numerical expression that combines the freely jointed chain (FJC) and the Kratky-Porod (elastic rod) polymer description (25, 26). The parameter lreflects the flexibility of the fiber; l is the statistical segment length that equals two times the persistence length in nm. The parameter c describes the presence of constraints on the random walk of the polymer. In the absence of such constraints, a linear fiber displays a maximum value of X at a site separation distance of l ∼ 1.7 segments, followed by a gradual decrease in interaction frequency with increasing site separation. The presence of constraints is detected as a deviation from this behavior [see also (27)]. Formally, such deviations may result in apparent circular behavior of an intrinsically linear polymer. The parameter c gives the apparent circle size in kb. For a linear polymer that is unconstrained, c is infinitely large. The relation between the cross-linking frequencyX(s) and the site separation s can be expressed asEmbedded Image(2)where β = 11.1 nm/kb × (s/l) × [1 – (s/c)]. For a linear polymer,s/c approaches zero and Eq. 2 becomes the simpler equation that describes a linear polymer (26).

Equation 2 includes an estimate of the packing ratio of the chromatin fiber. In yeast, a packing ratio of 11.1 nm/kb was estimated from a mass density of 6 nucleosomes per 11 nm of fiber (28), corresponding to a 30-nm fiber and a nucleosome repeat length of 165 base pairs (29). For the following analysis we made the assumption that β is constant and that there is no higher level of organization of the chromatin fiber. Also, we assumed that the fiber is not confined to a limited volume. Equation 2 can be applied to chromosomes of any organism by replacing the value of 11.1 in the expression for β with a suitable fiber packing ratio.

We applied Eq. 2 to the modeling of the ∼320-kb yeast chromosome III as it occurs in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Nuclei were purified from haploid cells arrested in G1 with α-factor (7), and cross-linking frequencies were determined for 78 different site pairs. The pairs examined were selected to represent the full range of genomic site separation distances across the entire length of the chromosome (all pairwise combinations of positions 1 to 13 shown in Fig. 1C). Interaction frequencies were plotted against the genomic site separation s (Fig. 3A) and optimal values forl, c, and k were found by fitting the data to Eq. 2, yielding l = 56 nm, c = 363 kb, and k = 4.0 × 106 M−1 (R 2= 0.86). Although any particular model can only be an approximation for real chromatin, the current results suggest that polymer models are useful for this purpose and that the particular model we used is a good first approximation for chromosome III under the cellular circumstances of these experiments. We did not need to include terms for volume exclusion in this analysis. Deviations from the fitted curve may be due to noise but may also reflect real differences (see below).

Figure 3

Analysis of the structure of chromosome III during interphase. The 3C technology was applied to nuclei purified from haploid NKY2997 cells arrested in G1 with α-factor. (A) All pairwise cross-linking frequencies between positions 1 and 13 shown in Fig. 1C were determined in triplicate, and the average and standard error of the mean are plotted against site separation. The fit to Eq. 2 is indicated by the continuous line, and the values for l, c, and k are indicated. (B) Cross-linking frequencies between a large number of sites located in the AT-rich domain (left panel) and the GC-rich domain (right panel) of the right arm of chromosome III were determined in triplicate, and the average and standard error of the mean are plotted against site separation. Fits to Eq. 2 are indicated by continuous lines, and the values for l,c, and k are indicated. (C) Schematic representation of the complete distance table of chromosome III. Distances were calculated for all 78 pairwise combinations of sites 1 to 13 (Fig. 1C) using cross-linking frequencies shown in (A). (D) Population-average 3D model of chromosome III, drawn with Truespace software. The model was calculated using the set of 78 distances shown in (C). The numbers correspond to the positions shown in Fig. 1C. The AT-rich region in the right arm (positions 6 to 9) is indicated in green, the GC-rich domains (position 2 to 6 and 9 to 12) are indicated in red, and the subtelomeric regions are indicated in blue.

A value of c = 363 kb indicates that this linear chromosome is constrained in a circular conformation whose apparent circle size is only slightly larger than the actual length of the chromosome (∼320 kb). This feature is most prominently apparent in the tendency for cross-linking frequencies to increase for larger site separations (s > 200 kb; Fig. 3A).

A value of l = 56 nm corresponds to a persistence length of 28 nm, which in turn corresponds to 2.5 kb. These results suggest that yeast chromatin is quite flexible [see also (30)]. The persistence length, expressed in kb, of chromatin is considerably larger than that of naked DNA (2.5 kb versus 150 base pairs). Therefore, this property affects interactions between sites separated by larger genetic distances in the case of chromatin than in the case of naked DNA. Hence, chromosome III is quite compact, with sites separated by large genomic distances being relatively close to one another in three-dimensional (3D) space. The highest relative local concentration of two sites occurs at a genomic site separation distance of s ∼ 9 kb [l ∼ 60 nm (31)]. At this site separation, the relative local concentration of the two sites is 6 × 10−7 M. The local concentration remains relatively high, at least 2 × 10−8 M, for all pairs of sites along chromosome III. These values imply that interactions between proteins present at nanomolar concentrations will be strongly facilitated when they are bound to this chromosome, even if their binding sites are separated by a relatively large genomic distance.

The value of l also has consequences for the higher order organization of yeast chromosomes. Although some physical properties of mitotic and meiotic chromosomes are likely to be different from the properties we determined here, the flexibility of the chromatin fiber in G1 is at least consistent with the observed loop sizes of ∼20 kb of meiotic chromosomes (32) and estimates of loop sizes of 9 to 15 kb in mitotic chromosomes (33, 34). These relationships suggest that chromatin flexibility may be an important parameter of loop formation and function [see also (19)]. The value of lwill also be important for chromosomal processes that involve looping and other long-range interactions along the chromatin fiber.

Yeast chromosomes comprise GC-rich and AT-rich domains, or isochores, of about 50 to 100 kb (35, 36). Chromosome III has one AT-rich domain (located on the right arm from 100 to 190 kb) and two GC-rich domains (located on the left arm from 25 to 100 kb and on the right arm from 190 to 280 kb). These domains exhibit functional differentiation, as is most clearly illustrated by the fact that the GC-rich domains display high levels of meiotic recombination relative to the AT-rich domain (37, 38). These domains are likely analogous to the R- and G-bands found in larger eukaryotes (19,39). We were interested in the possibility that these isochore domains might also differ in their basic structural properties. We analyzed a large number of interactions, for sites separated by 7 to 85 kb, within each given region. Results for the AT-rich and GC-rich domains of the right arm are shown in Fig. 3B. Fitting the data to Eq. 2 yielded very good fits with l = 69 nm,c = 738 kb, and k = 6.1 × 106 M−1 for the AT-rich domain (R 2 = 0.90) andl = 56 nm, c = 171 kb, andk = 2.8 × 106 M−1 for the GC-rich domain (R 2 = 0.96). The 75-kb GC-rich domain within the left arm of chromosome III was analyzed in a similar way, and values of l = 62 nm,c = 117 kb, and k = 3.0 × 106 M−1 were obtained (9). Essentially the same results were obtained in exponentially growingMAT a and MATα cells (9).

The AT-rich domain exhibits little curvature (c = 738 kb) and thus behaves similarly to an unconstrained linear polymer. In contrast, the GC-rich domains exhibit apparent circular conformations (c = 171 kb and c = 117 kb). This difference is also reflected in a qualitative difference in the data of the two domains. In the case of the GC-rich domain, cross-linking frequencies of sites separated by more than 55 kb were higher (by a factor of 2 to 3) than expected for an unconstrained fiber, and they do not decrease with increasing site separation. In contrast, the interaction frequencies measured in the AT-rich domain continue to decrease with increasing site separation. These results show that the degree of apparent curvature varies by domain along the chromosome, in correlation with variation by domain in average base composition. The constraints responsible for the apparent curvature of GC-rich regions could be internal, via intrinsic bias in fiber path, or external (e.g., by tethering of parts of the chromosome to the nuclear envelope).

A twofold difference in the value of k was found when the AT- and GC-rich domains were compared, whereas an intermediate value ofk was determined for the entire chromosome (k = 4.0 × 106 M−1). These data sets were obtained using the same DNA sample as PCR template. Thus, the different values of k may reflect real differences in the internal structure of the fiber (e.g., nucleosome density). We assume a homogeneous packing ratio, but small differences in packing ratio between these domains may exist, and in the current analysis this will also result in differences in the value ofk. The AT-rich domain may be slightly stiffer than the rest of the chromosome (l = 69 nm versus 56 nm), but given the intrinsic uncertainties of a three-parameter fit with an error in l of about 10%, we do not know whether the difference in l between the AT- and GC-rich domains is significant.

Given a complete set of spatial distances between a number of sites along a chromosome, a 3D model of the chromosome can be developed. Such distances can be obtained from cross-linking frequency data in two steps. First, each intersite cross-linking frequency can be related to a relative local concentration by Eq. 1. Second, because the chromatin fiber is accurately described by the polymer model outlined above, each relative local concentration can be related to the squared average spatial distance <r 2> (in nm2) between two sites. For the FJC model this relation is given byEmbedded Image Embedded Image(3)which holds for both linear and circular polymers. Given a complete distance table for a number of sites along the length of the chromosome, a population-average 3D model of the chromosome can be calculated using Choleski decomposition of symmetric matrices (40).

The 78 measured cross-linking frequencies shown in Fig. 3A were converted to 78 average intrachromosomal distances [usingk = 4.0 × 106 M−1; see (41)] and are schematically indicated in the distance matrix shown in Fig. 3C. These 78 distances constitute a complete distance table for the 13 positions shown in Fig. 1C and were used to calculate a population-average 3D model of chromosome III (Fig. 3D) [see (40)]. The AT-rich domain of the chromosome is indicated in green (positions 6 to 9), the GC-rich domains (positions 2 to 6 and 9 to 12) are indicated in red, and the subtelomeric regions are indicated in blue. The difference between each measured distance and the corresponding modeled distance was on average 6%, indicating that the 3D model fits the data very well.

The model clearly shows the circular behavior of the chromosome, with the two telomeres closely juxtaposed. The two telomeres are on average 170 nm apart. The GC-rich domains appear more strongly curved than the AT-rich domain, although the resolution of the model is not sufficient to make these domain-related constraints clearly visible. The model also indicates the presence of a sharp bend around the centromeric region (position 6), partly because interaction frequencies between positions 7 and 8 and positions 3 and 4 were higher than the corresponding fitted values in Fig. 3A. As a result of these deviations, the chromosome appears as a contorted ring and not as a homogeneous circular polymer.

The size of the model chromosome is in accord with several expectations. First, the largest distance is that between the centromere and the right telomere. Those sites are on average 330 nm apart, which is considerably less than the diameter of a haploid yeast nucleus (∼1.3 to 1.8 μm). Second, the volume of chromosome III, estimated by assuming the chromosome to be a sphere with a diameter of 330 nm, is at most 2% of that of the nucleus, in agreement with the fact that chromosome III contains ∼2.6% of the genome. Third, with a value of l = 56 nm (Fig. 3A), the longest chromosome arm of yeast, which is around 1 Mb, would have a maximum average extension of ∼800 nm and thus would fit in the nucleus without the need to loop back. These observations indicate that the estimate of a packing ratio for yeast chromatin of 11.1 nm/kb is probably accurate. We also determined 3D models for chromosome III from exponentially growing MAT a and MATα cells, and similar models were obtained (9).

It is important to emphasize that this model is the population-average path of a very flexible chromosome. The actual trajectory of an individual chromosome at a given time will fluctuate around conformations similar to the one depicted in Fig. 3D.

The approaches described provide detailed information about the 3D organization of chromosomes and the nucleus in general. Potentially, microarray technology can be used to detect ligation products. Moreover, 3C technology can be applied to any organism for which genomic sequence information is available. When combined with other approaches, information about spatial organization can be related to specific chromosome functions.

  • * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jdekker{at}


Stay Connected to Science

Navigate This Article