Report

Control of the Selectivity of the Aquaporin Water Channel Family by Global Orientational Tuning

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  19 Apr 2002:
Vol. 296, Issue 5567, pp. 525-530
DOI: 10.1126/science.1067778

Abstract

Aquaporins are transmembrane channels found in cell membranes of all life forms. We examine their apparently paradoxical property, facilitation of efficient permeation of water while excluding protons, which is of critical importance to preserving the electrochemical potential across the cell membrane. We have determined the structure of the Escherichia coliaquaglyceroporin GlpF with bound water, in native (2.7 angstroms) and in W48F/F200T mutant (2.1 angstroms) forms, and carried out 12-nanosecond molecular dynamics simulations that define the spatial and temporal probability distribution and orientation of a single file of seven to nine water molecules inside the channel. Two conserved asparagines force a central water molecule to serve strictly as a hydrogen bond donor to its neighboring water molecules. Assisted by the electrostatic potential generated by two half-membrane spanning loops, this dictates opposite orientations of water molecules in the two halves of the channel, and thus prevents the formation of a “proton wire,” while permitting rapid water diffusion. Both simulations and observations revealed a more regular distribution of channel water and an increased water permeability for the W48F/F200T mutant.

Efficient permeation of water across cell membranes is mediated by a family of transmembrane water channels called aquaporins (AQPs) (1, 2). More than ten different genes encoding AQPs have been identified in the human genome, and their defective forms are known to cause diseases including nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, Sjorgens syndrome, and congenital cataract formation (3). They share the remarkable property of effective water conductance at rates close to 109s−1 combined with a strict exclusion of all ions including protons (4). Aquaglyceroporins such as human AQP7, a glycerol specific channel in adipose tissue, and the E. coliglycerol channel, GlpF, belong to a subfamily that possesses the additional capability of passive and stereoselective carbohydrate transport (5). The recently determined structure of GlpF at 2.2 Å resolution with three bound glycerol molecules (6,7) explains the channel's specificity and set the stage for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to reveal the pathway and mechanism of conduction (8). The x-ray crystal structure of a related human AQP1 has also been reported recently (9).

The high proton mobility in bulk water is readily explained by the Grotthuss mechanism involving proton tunneling from one water molecule to the next and rearrangement of hydrogen bonds (10). Proton conductance in proteins occurs through a “proton wire,” in which a single-file arrangement of properly hydrogen-bonded water molecules and polar groups of protein, provides an optimal pathway for efficient proton transfer (11–13), the latter requiring, however, a reorientation of water molecules. Implied by the single file of glycerol and water molecules in glycerol saturated GlpF (GlpF+G) (6, 8), the water conducting property of AQPs suggests that they support a column of water molecules inside the channel, raising the long standing question as to why protons are so effectively blocked. In order to elucidate the origin of proton exclusion and the molecular mechanism of water diffusion in AQPs, we determined in the absence of glycerol the crystal structure of the native (GlpF-G) and the W48F/F200T mutant (GlpFW48F/F200T) forms of GlpF (Table 1) and carried out MD simulations (14) of membrane-embedded GlpF+G, GlpF-G, and GlpFW48F/F200T tetrameric channels to reveal diffusive behavior and positions and orientations of water molecules inside the channel.

Table 1

Crystallographic statistics. GlpF was overexpressed, purified, and crystallized as described (6), replacing glycerol by xylose (15% w/w) for (GlpF-G)A and (GlpF-G)B, a nontransported substrate (6). Single crystals were subject to x-ray diffraction at ALS beam line 5.0.2 using a CCD detector (Quantum IV). The crystals were in space group I422 and were isomorphous to crystals previously grown in 15% (w/w) glycerol. The structures were determined by direct isomorphous replacement using the protein component of 1FX8 and refined with CNS (27). The RMSD between 1FX8 (at 2.2 Å resolution) and (GlpF-G)A is 0.26 Å, and (GlpF-G)B is 0.51 Å and GlpF W48F/F200T is 0.20 Å, the RMSD between (GlpF-G)A and (GlpF-G)B is 0.18 Å.

View this table:

The crystallographic structures of GlpF+G and GlpF-G are virtually identical (Table 1). The most pronounced structural changes, revealed by the F o(water) −F o(glycerol) difference map (Fig. 1), are small but significant in the orientation of the three selectivity filter (SF) lining residues, Trp48, Phe200, and Arg206, and toward the center of the narrowest portion of the channel (Fig. 1, C through E). The observed subtle changes in the crystal structure are within the expected thermal fluctuations in MD simulations (at 310 K), yet a slightly increased fluctuation of Trp48 in GlpF-G relative to GlpF+G is discernible from the simulations [see supplementary materials (15)]. Thus, in the water-bound state, the channel diameter is narrower at its constriction by ∼0.4 Å, indicating the intimate steric interaction between glycerol and channel at the SF region.

Figure 1

Structural differences between the glycerol-bound form (GlpF+G) and the water bound form (GlpF-G) of the glycerol channel. (A) Model of monomeric GlpF with a superimposed F o(water) –F o(glycerol) Fourier difference map contoured at 2σ with positive (red), and negative density (blue). Views are perpendicular and along the fourfold symmetry axis. Considerable difference density is present inside the substrate conducting channel, along the fourfold symmetry axis, and in between. (B) Close up stereo image of the selectivity filter region of GlpF+G with the superimposed Fourier difference map (contoured at 1.7σ). View as in (A). Glycerol 2 (G2) is encompassed by negative density, demonstrating its absence in (GlpF-G). The distribution of positive and negative difference density around Phe200 indicates a shift in its position. (C) Close up stereoimage as in (B) but with view along the channel axis. Positive difference density around Trp48 and Phe200 toward the channel center and negative difference density on the opposite side indicate their shifted position in (GlpF+G). (D) Comparison of channel radii [(GlpF-G)A, light blue; (GlpF-G)B, dark blue; (GlpF+G), red; (see Table 1)] determined by the Hole2 program (28). In the absence of glycerol the constriction (z = −4.5) becomes narrower by about 10% and is shifted by about 2 Å (z = −2.5). (Inset) Superposition of the channel constricting residues in the selectivity filter of (GlpF+G), (red) and (GlpF-G)B, (blue). (E) Rotation of Phe200 in GlpF+G (red) and (GlpF-G)B (blue), viewed along its aromatic plane. The 2F oF c electron density maps are contoured at 2σ. Although backbone atom positions remain unchanged, the phenyl ring in (GlpF-G)A and (GlpF-G)B is rotated clockwise relative to GlpF+G by 8.8° and 6.1°, respectively (corresponding to movements of 0.44 and 0.58 Å for Cδ1 and 0.61 and 0.74 Å for Cɛ1).

The analysis of the 4 ns MD trajectory of GlpF-G reveals a hydrogen-bonded single file of water molecules in the 20 Å constriction region of the channel. The integrity of the single file is maintained throughout the simulation and water translocation along the channel axis is accordingly correlated [see supplementary materials (15)]. The simulations exhibit a one-dimensional water diffusion in the constriction region [see supplementary materials (15)], corresponding to a diffusion constant of 0.46 × 10−5 cm2 s−1, which compares well with the observed value of 0.4 × 10−5 to 0.8 × 10−5 cm2 s−1 for AQP1 (16). Eighteen full water permeation events through the 20 Å constriction region of the four channels were observed during the 4-ns MD simulation of GlpF-G. The conduction rate (1.1 H2O/ns/channel) compares satisfactorily with the experimentally deduced flux for GlpF (3, 17, 18), 0.5 × 109 s−1, and with the flux observed in MD simulations reported recently (19).

The observed electron density assigned to channel water corresponds closely to the distribution of water molecules determined by MD (Fig. 2). Water positions and orientations indicate that the molecules are all hydrogen donors to the line of carbonyl oxygen atoms that face the inside of the channel (8), with the exception of the central water molecule. The smeared out probability for locating these atoms within −6 Å ≤ z ≤ 14 Å, i.e., the constriction region, suggests water mobility.Alternating O and H peaks indicate hydrogen bonds between the water molecules. Gaps in the electron density are notable between W90 and W85 (5.5 Å apart), and W86 and W349 (4.5 Å apart). Furthermore, the electron density at the narrowest point of the channel atz ≈ −3 Å, opposing the hydrogen donor NH2 of the guanidino group of Arg206, is low (Fig. 2C). These observations may be accounted for by the disorder of water molecules at these sites. Alternatively, there may be no water at all since the diffraction experiments were carried out at 100 K where translational and rotational motions of the water molecules freeze out (20, 21) and water transport in the channel does not occur (22). These sites lie close to the transition state in the conduction pathway (6), and might exhibit a small population at 100 K. The SF region shows a reduced water probability also in the 310 K MD simulations and an extrapolation to 100 K correlates closely with the observed low occupancy in this region.

Figure 2

(A) Simulated distributions of O and H atoms of water molecules inside the GlpF-G channel. The central peak in the O distribution at 5.4 Å corresponds to the midpoint between the NPA motifs (vertical line). The systematic shift of the H peaks relative to the O peaks implies that the schematically illustrated water orientation is present in the channel, as confirmed in panel (B). The positions (Mean ± SD) of hydrogen bonding sites in the channel closely correlate with water atomic distributions. The origin of the z-axis is Ala201:O. (B) Water orientation in GlpF-G depicted by order parametersP 1(z) = 〈cosθ〉 andP 2(z) = 1/2 〈3cos2θ − 1〉; θ is the angle between the membrane normal and the normalized (unit) water dipole vector;P 2(z) differentiates between orthogonality [P 2(z) = −0.5] and isotropic average orientation [P 2(z) = 0]. Black lines represent the order parameters calculated in the presence of the full electric field of the channel; colored lines are P 1(z) calculated after turning off the charges on the NH2 groups of the NPA asparagines (I), turning off the charges on the backbone atoms of the two half-membrane spanning helices M3 and M7 (II), combining I and II (III), and combining I and II and turning off charges on the channel lining carbonyl groups (IV). (C) Observed location of water molecules in the water bound channel (GlpF-G)Awith an overlaid 2F oF c electron density map contoured at 1.5σ (light green) and 2σ (dark green). Positions of the water molecules were determined iteratively from peaks in F oF c maps, starting from both, an empty channel and a water filled channel (and cross-checked by the corresponding omit maps). Hydrogen bonds are shown by blue dashed lines. An occupancy of 1 for all water positions was maintained in the subsequent refinement cycles.

Our MD simulations clearly show that starting from the NPA center, water molecules are oriented in opposite directions in the two halves of the channel, with their hydrogen atoms pointing toward the exits (Figs. 2 and 3) as postulated by Murata et al. (23). An almost orthogonal orientation of water relative to the membrane normal is featured atz ≈ 5.4 Å, the midpoint of the NPA motifs (Fig. 2A).

Figure 3

(A) Snapshot from MD simulation revealing the orientation of the hydrogen bonded water network that precludes proton conduction in GlpF. The opposite orientations of water molecules in the two halves of the channel start from the central water molecule opposite the NPA motifs (residues 68-70 and 203-205 shown in green with the side chains of Asn68and Asn203 displayed in licorice representation), and are stabilized by the electrostatic fields generated by the M3 and M7 helices (shown in blue), and by hydrogen bonds to the carbonyl groups in the non-helical parts of two half-membrane spanning repeats (shown in gray). The exposed carbonyl oxygens of residues 65-66 and 198-200 are displayed as red spheres. Residues Arg206, Phe200, and Trp48 constituting the selectivity filter appear in light blue. (B) Schematic illustration of the proton preclusion. Initial protonation at any of the two termini of the single file (shown by black arrows inI) cannot be accomplished due to the adopted configuration. Proton release at any terminus can only propagate to the central water (blue curved arrows) and results in an unfavorable water orientation relative to the helical dipolar field as depicted in II; furthermore, a proton cannot be taken up by the other terminus to complete the transfer. Water reorientation (green arrows) leading to the availability of water oxygen atoms for outside protons at one terminus results in an unfavorable water orientation (III) and breaks the hydrogen bond network in the middle of the channel. Panel (A) was created with the molecular graphics program VMD (29).

This arrangement contrasts with the uniform orientation of water molecules in gramicidin A, a water and a proton channel (13). Between the two NPA motifs, the central water oxygen atom becomes hydrogen bonded to the NHδs of Asn68 and Asn203 with the water dipole consequently restrained to lie perpendicular to the channel axis. Opposite the NPA motifs across the channel there are only hydrophobic residues, Ile187, its flanking Val52, and Leu159, serving to prohibit a different hydrogen bonding pattern. Hence, the highly conserved and constrained Asn residues in an otherwise hydrophobic environment function to specifically hydrogen bond to a single water molecule, making its lone electron pairs unavailable as proton acceptors for the neighboring water molecules. As a result of the water orientation at the NPA center, the orientations of the neighboring water molecules are constrained such that successive O-H bonds are oriented away from this central water, with the other O-H of each water hydrogen bonding to successive carbonyls in the channel lining. Thus, this bipolar orientation is propagated outward along the water file.

In addition to the hydrogen bond donors of the central asparagines, the α-helices M3 and M7 generate electrostatic fields directed toward the center of the channel (23) (Fig. 3), which stabilize the water configuration shown in Figs. 2 and 3. To test the relative contributions of the Asn NH2 groups, the helix dipoles (9), and the line of carbonyls to the orientation of water molecules in the channel, four additional simulations, 0.5 ns each, were carried out in which one, two, or all of these effects were “turned off” (Fig. 2B). When the charges of the NH2-groups of the Asn68 and Asn203side chains are turned off (I) the water configuration is partially affected. As the charges of the backbone atoms of the half-helices M3 and M7 are turned off (II), and as this is combined with I (III), the bipolar orientation of the single-file arrangement breaks down leading to a uniform water orientation in the channel, a potential proton wire. Although the dipoles of the channel lining carbonyl groups alone cannot maintain the bipolar orientation of water molecules, their absence (IV in Fig. 2B) significantly accelerates the relaxation toward orientational disorder. Therefore, these interactions combined establish a global orientation control mechanism that abrogates any proton transport through the channel.

The observed low occupancy of water molecules in the SF region of GlpF-G demonstrated by measurements and simulations (Fig. 2) may be the cause for the low rate of water permeation in GlpF. In order to assess such effects, a double mutant, GlpFW48F/F200T, in which both the size and polarity of the channel were increased in the SF region, was studied by means of experimental measurements and MD simulations. Light scattering assays (18) on reconstituted vesicles indicated an increased water permeation for GlpFW48F/F200T over the wild-type GlpF [rateGlpF(W48F/F200T)/ratewt-GlpF= 1.25 ± 0.095; n = 3]. In close agreement with the observations, our MD simulations revealed a 38% increase in the number of permeated water molecules in GlpFW48F/F200T (25 water molecules passed the constriction regions of the four channels in 4 ns).

As illustrated in Fig. 4A, both simulations and electron density data for GlpFW48F/F200T indicate a significant increase of water density at the SF region (the mutation site), as compared to native GlpF (Fig. 2). Several water molecules are present in the electron density map of the SF region. The calculated density of water is now higher in this region than in the other parts of the channel (Fig. 4A). Otherwise, the position and orientation of water molecules in the constriction region of the channel do not show any significant variation from those in GlpF-G (Fig. 2). In particular, the bipolar orientation of water molecules inside the channel is preserved after the mutations (Fig. 4B). We therefore predict that GlpFW48F/F200T is also impermeable to protons, a prediction which is at variance with the SF-based mechanism for proton exclusion suggested in (19), but in line with observations that mutated E. coli cells grew without change in phenotype.

Figure 4

Water distribution and orientation in GlpFW48F/F200T. (A) Simulated distributions of O and H atoms of water in the constriction region of the channel (−6 Å ≤ z ≤ 14 Å). (Inset) Water molecules at the selectivity filter region of GlpF double mutant W48F/F200T with the superimposed 2F oF cmap, contoured at 1σ around selected water positions. Four novel water molecules W45, W206, W217, W218 form a hydrogen bond network with channel atoms and with each other. (B) Bipolar water orientation in the two halves of the channel, orthogonal orientation of the central water molecule, and isotropic distribution of water molecules outside the channel are illustrated by the calculated order parameters P 1(z) andP 2(z) (as described in Fig. 2).

Proton transport along water chains requires a uniform orientation of hydrogen-bonded water molecules that permits reorientation during proton transfer, requirements neither of which is met by the bipolar water file in GlpF (Figs. 2 and 4). The faithful description of the GlpFW48F/F200T mutant by our simulations gives credence to the suggested mechanism. In light of the absolute conservation of the NPA motifs and the conservation of structure throughout the AQPs (3, 6, 9), we propose that this mechanism of precluding proton conduction applies to the entire AQP family.

  • * These authors contributed equally to this work.

  • Present address: Emerald BioStructures, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110, USA.

  • Visiting from Membrane and Statistical Physics Group, Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Denmark; present address: Quantum Protein Centre, Department of Physics, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark.

  • § To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: stroud{at}msg.ucsf.edu (R.M.S.) or schulte{at}ks.uiuc.edu (K.S.)

REFERENCES AND NOTES

View Abstract

Navigate This Article