A Heat-Sensitive TRP Channel Expressed in Keratinocytes

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  14 Jun 2002:
Vol. 296, Issue 5575, pp. 2046-2049
DOI: 10.1126/science.1073140


Mechanical and thermal cues stimulate a specialized group of sensory neurons that terminate in the skin. Three members of the transient receptor potential (TRP) family of channels are expressed in subsets of these neurons and are activated at distinct physiological temperatures. Here, we describe the cloning and characterization of a novel thermosensitive TRP channel. TRPV3 has a unique threshold: It is activated at innocuous (warm) temperatures and shows an increased response at noxious temperatures. TRPV3 is specifically expressed in keratinocytes; hence, skin cells are capable of detecting heat via molecules similar to those in heat-sensing neurons.

TRPs belong to a large family of nonselective cation channels that function in a variety of processes, including temperature sensation (1, 2). Vanilloid receptor 1 (TRPV1, also called VR-1) is activated by noxious heat (>42°C) (3). TRPV2 (VRL-1) is also activated by heat, but with a higher threshold (>50°C), whereas TRPM8 (CMR1) is induced by cool/cold temperatures (<25°C) (4–6). A receptor for innocuous warm temperatures has not been identified. Also, the persistent sensitivity of VR-1 knockout animals to moderately noxious heat stimuli implies the presence of another heat receptor (7,8).

We searched DNA databases for TRPV1-related TRP channels by constructing a hidden Markov model (HMM) of the TRPV1 and TRPV2 protein sequences from different mammalian species. With this model, we queried the six-frame translation of human genomic sequences and identified multiple putative exons with a great degree of sequence similarity to the ankyrin and transmembrane domains of TRPV1. We mapped these exons to two genes, one of which is now known as TRPV4 (9,10). The other gene we have named TRPV3. Full-length sequence of mouse TRPV3 (GenBank accession number AF510316) was derived from a combination of exon prediction software, polymerase chain reaction, and rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) from newborn skin cDNA (11). Several murine expressed sequence tags from skin tissues contain 3′-untranslated region TRPV3 sequence (e.g., BB148735, BB148088), and recently the human TRPV3 sequence has been annotated in GenBank (accession numbers GI 185877 and GI 18587705) (12).

The predicted TRPV3 protein is composed of 791 amino acid residues. The overall sequence of mouse TRPV3 has 43% identity to TRPV1 and TRPV4, 41% to TRPV2, and 20% to TRPV5 and TRPV6 (fig. S1). TRPV3 has six putative transmembrane domains and four predicted NH2-terminal ankyrin domains that are thought to be involved in protein-protein interactions. We also identified two coiled-coil domains NH2-terminal to the ankyrin domains in TRPV3 (fig. S1). Coiled-coil domains have been previously reported to be present in some TRP channels, but not in TRPVs (6,13). Further examination showed that TRPV1, but not the other members of the TRPV family, also has putative coiled-coil domains in the same location. Interestingly, both TRPV1 and TRPV3 were predicted to reside on human chromosome 17p13 and mouse chromosome 11B4. Our mapping analysis of bacterial artificial chromosome clones, and later the assembled human and mouse genome sequences, revealed the distance between the two genes to be about 10 kb (Fig. 1B) (14).

Figure 1

TRPV3 sequence and genomic localization. (A) Rooted tree showing protein sequence relationship of different members of the TRPV ion channel family. (B) Relative position of TRPV1 and TRPV3 coding sequences on mouse (11B4) and human (17p13) chromosomes.

Given the high degree of homology of TRPV3 to TRPV family members, we tested whether TRPV3 responds to stimuli that activate other closely related family members. The murine full-length TRPV3 was stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, which do not express an endogenous TRPV3 isoform (11, 14). Transfected cells were assayed electrophysiologically by whole-cell voltage-clamp techniques (11). Capsaicin (1 μM), an activator of TRPV1, did not evoke a response in TRPV3-expressing cells (14). Similarly, no current responses were seen when TRPV3-expressing cells were challenged with a hypo-osmotic solution containing 70 mM NaCl or with low pH (pH 5.4) (14). However, raising the temperature of superperfused external solution from room temperature to 45°C evoked currents in TRPV3-expressing cells. Analysis of currents evoked by temperature ramps from ∼15° to ∼48°C (Fig. 2A) showed that little current was elicited until temperatures rose above ∼33°C and that the current continued to increase in the noxious temperature range (>42°C). With these findings, TRPV3-expressing cells were subsequently maintained at 33°C to avoid constitutive activation. The current amplitude was influenced by the presence or absence of Ca2+ in the external medium, with reduced current amplitudes in the presence of 2 mM Ca2+ after a prior challenge in Ca2+-free solution (Fig. 2B). This finding is reminiscent of the channel properties of TRPV5 and TRPV6 (15). The heat-evoked current in TRPV3-expressing CHO cells increased exponentially at temperatures above 35°C, with a factor ofe (2.71828) increase per 5.29° ± 0.35°C (n = 12), corresponding to a meanQ 10 (increase in reaction rate per 10°C increase in temperature) of 6.62 (Fig. 2C). This temperature dependence is considerably greater than that seen for most ion channel currents, which typically have Q 10 values in the range 1.5 to 2.0, but is less than the values noted for TRPV1 (Q 10 = 17.8) (16). In some cells, it was difficult to see a sharp threshold temperature. However, measurable temperature-dependent currents below 30°C showed a factor of e increase for a 22.72° ± 3.31°C (n = 12) increase in temperature (Q 10 = 1.69).

Figure 2

TRPV3 is activated by heat. Currents were evoked by heat in TRPV3-expressing CHO cells. (A) Inward current to temperature ramp (holding potential V h = −60 mV) in calcium-free external solutions. (B) Heat-evoked currents of the same cell in Ca2+-free and subsequently in Ca2+-containing solutions showing increased inward current in Ca2+ conditions (V h = −60 mV). (C) Semilogarithmic plot of current against temperature with double-exponential fitted line for the same trace as (A). Note the discontinuity at ∼33°C (arrow). (D) Current-voltage relation in calcium-containing external solution showing the pronounced outward rectification of TRPV3 at 48°C but not at room temperature. Note the small outward currents at room temperature.

The elevated temperature–evoked currents in TRPV3-expressing cells showed a pronounced outward rectification (Fig. 2D) with a reversal potential in the standard recording solution of –1.22 ± 1 mV. Reducing the NaCl in the external solution to 70 mM (from 140 mM) shifted the reversal potential by –19 mV, as expected for a cation-selective conductance (shift = –17.5 mV). Differences in reversal potentials were also used to determine the ionic selectivity of TRPV3 channels. In simplified external solutions, the reversal potentials of the heat-activated currents were similar when NaCl (E rev = –1.22 ± 1.08 mV,n = 5) was replaced with either KCl (E rev = −0.40 ± 0.77 mV,n = 6) or CsCl (E rev = −1.14 ± 0.53 mV, n = 6), which respectively yield relative permeability ratiosP K/P Na andP Cs/P Na close to 1. The relative permeabilities of Ca2+ and Mg2+ were estimated from the shift in reversal potentials when their concentrations were raised from 1 mM to 30 mM in a 100 mM NaCl solution containing the divalent cation under investigation. The reversal potential shifts (from −9.1 ± 1.40 mV to +11.29 ± 0.38 mV for Ca2+, and from –8.41 ± 0.50 mV to +10.34 ± 2.38 mV for Mg2+) correspond toP Ca/P Na = 2.57 andP Mg/P Na = 2.18, respectively. Thus, TRPV3 is a nonselective cation channel that discriminates poorly between the tested monovalent cations and has significant divalent cation permeability.

Heat activation of TRPV3 showed a marked sensitization with repeated heat stimulation. This was studied at a steady membrane potential of –60 mV and with voltage ramps. The first response to a step increase from room temperature to ∼45°C was often very small, but the current response grew with repeated heat steps (Fig. 3A). Sensitization to heat has also been observed for TRPV1 and TRPV2 (4, 17). Application of voltage ramps showed that sensitization was associated with an increase in outward rectification (Fig. 3B). A protocol of repeated temperature challenges was used to investigate whether antagonists of TRPV1 were inhibitors of TRPV3. Under normal conditions, a heat challenge delivered 2 min after four or five sensitizing heat steps evoked a current that was 1.57 ± 0.25 (n = 4) times the amplitude of the preceding response (Fig. 3C). Application of 10 μM capsazepine, a competitive capsaicin antagonist at TRPV1, for 2 min before the test heat challenge did not reduce the current amplitude (2.31 ± 0.36 times the amplitude of the preceding response,n = 4). In contrast, a similar exposure to 1 μM ruthenium red, a noncompetitive inhibitor of other TRPV channels, reduced the current to 0.34 ± 0.03 (n = 5) times the amplitude of the preceding response (Fig. 3D). Taken together, these results indicate that TRPV3 is a cation-permeable channel activated by warm and hot temperatures and has channel properties reminiscent of other TRPV channels.

Figure 3

TRPV3 becomes sensitized to repeated applications of the heat stimulus. (A) Repeated heat steps from 25° to 45°C evoke increased inward current responses (V h = −60 mV). (B) The outward rectification becomes more pronounced with repeated voltage ramps in 48°C external solution. Note that the inward current here showed a only small (factor of <1.5) increase when the temperature was maintained at 48°C, while the outward current increased by a factor of >15. The experiments in (A) and (B) were conducted in the presence of 2 mM CaCl2 in the external solution. (C) Control protocol for antagonist experiments. Note that the responses continue to sensitize with repeated heat steps in the absence of putative antagonists (V h = −60 mV). (D) Ruthenium red (1 μM) attenuates the sensitization and inhibits the heat response (V h = −60 mV).

To determine the overall expression pattern of the heat-activated TRPV3 channel, we used the full-length mouse TRPV3 sequence as a probe for Northern blot analysis (11). No TRPV3 expression was detected with commercial Northern blots (14). We then used blots from adult rat that included tissues relevant to somatic sensation, including dorsal root ganglia (DRG), spinal cord, and skin (Fig. 4A). An mRNA of ∼6.5 kb was present in tissues derived from skin but not in DRG tissue, although transcripts could be detected in DRG by PCR (14). Probing the same adult blot with a TRPV1-specific probe confirmed its strong expression in DRG while demonstrating a lack of expression in skin tissues. Northern blot analysis of human adult and fetal skin also showed expression of TRPV3 (14). Cultured primary mouse keratinocytes as well as several epidermal cell lines (n = 10) did not show any TRPV3 expression by Northern blots (14). These findings suggest that TRPV3 expression may be down-regulated after tissue dissociation and long-term culture.

Figure 4

TRPV3 is expressed in keratinocytes. (A) Northern blot analysis of adult rat tissues reveals TRPV3 expression in skin but not in DRG. The blot was hybridized with TRPV3 cDNA, then reprobed with TRPV1 and glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) cDNA. (B) In situ hybridization showing expression of TRPV3 in the keratinocytes (Ker) and hair follicle (HF) of newborn mice. (C) Immunostaining for TRPV3 shows similar expression as in (B). (D) TRPV3 and PGP 9.5 immunostaining in adult rat keratinocytes show the presence of free nerve endings at the TRPV3-expressing cell layer. “In” designates the dermal layer. (E to G) TRPV3 and basal pan-cytokeratin immunostaining in adult rat keratinocytes illustrate TRPV3 expression in the basal keratinocytes. Additional expression was observed in cells that had begun to differentiate and thus migrated toward the tissue surface. Scale bars, 50 μm.

Further analysis of TRPV3 expression was performed by35S radioactive in situ hybridizations on cross sections of newborn mice (11, 18). Clear expression was detected in the epidermis and hair follicles with an antisense probe (Fig. 4B), but not with a control sense probe (14). No expression was detected in DRG (14). To study TRPV3 expression in more detail, we produced polyclonal antibodies to TRPV3 peptides from either the NH2-terminus or the COOH-terminus (11). Using either antibody, we observed TRPV3 immunoreactivity in most keratinocytes at the epidermal layer and in hair follicles from newborn and adult rodent tissues (Fig. 4) (14). Coexpression with various keratinocyte-specific markers shows that TRPV3 is expressed in the basal keratinocytes—which in vitro require low calcium concentrations to maintain their undifferentiated state—as well as in some of the more differentiated suprabasal layers of the epidermis (Fig. 4, E to G) (14). Temperature-sensing neurons are thought to terminate as free nerve endings mainly at the level of dermis, but some processes do extend into the epidermis (19,20). Cutaneous termini can be labeled with the immunohistochemical marker protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5), and we show that these epidermal endings indeed colocalize with TRPV3-expressing cells (Fig. 4D).

TRPV3 is activated at warm and hot temperatures and is expressed in skin cells (fig. S2). TRPV3 signaling may mediate a cell-autonomous response in keratinocytes upon exposure to heat. It is also possible that the heat-induced TRPV3 signal is transferred to nearby free nerve endings, thereby contributing to conscious sensations of warm and hot. This hypothesis is supported by indirect evidence that skin cells can act as thermal receptors. For instance, although dissociated DRG neurons can be directly activated by heat and cold, warm receptors have only been demonstrated in experiments where skin-nerve connectivity is intact (21, 22). TRPV3 has an activation threshold around 33° to 35°C. The presence of such a warm receptor in skin (with a resting temperature of 34°C) and not DRG neurons (with a resting temperature of 37°C at the cell body) would prevent a warm channel such as TRPV3 from being constitutively active at core 37°C temperatures. The residual heat sensitivity in TRPV1 knockout mice may also involve skin cells: Dissociated DRG neurons from TRPV1-null animals do not respond to moderate noxious stimulus at all, whereas skin-nerve preparations from such animals do respond (7,8, 23). Collectively, these data suggest that a warmth/heat receptor might be present in the skin, in addition to the heat receptors in DRG.

If keratinocytes indeed act as thermal receptors, how then is the information transferred to neurons? Synapses have not been found between keratinocytes and sensory termini; however, ultrastructural studies have shown that keratinocytes contact, and often surround, DRG nerve fibers through membrane-membrane apposition (19,20). Therefore, heat-activated TRPV3 signal from keratinocytes could be transduced to DRG neurons through direct chemical signaling. One potential signaling mechanism might involve adenosine triphosphate (ATP). P2X3, an ATP-gated channel, is present in sensory endings, and analysis of P2X3 knockout mice show a strong deficit in coding of warm temperatures (24, 25).Furthermore, release of ATP from damaged keratinocytes has been shown to cause action potentials in nociceptors via the P2X receptors (26).

  • * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ardem{at}


View Abstract

Navigate This Article