Brevia

Effects of Gaze on Amygdala Sensitivity to Anger and Fear Faces

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  06 Jun 2003:
Vol. 300, Issue 5625, pp. 1536
DOI: 10.1126/science.1082244

The amygdala is thought to be part of a neural system responsive to potential threat (1). Consistent with this is the amygdala's well-documented sensitivity to fear faces. What is puzzling, however, is the paucity of evidence for a similar involvement of the amygdala in the processing of anger displays. To address this apparent anomaly, researchers have speculated that the amygdala is involved not only in detecting threat but also in deciphering the source of threat, particularly when it is ambiguous (2). Virtually all studies to date investigating facial affect have used only direct-gaze facial displays. The issue of gaze becomes pertinent because anger faces signal impending aggression on the part of the expressor, whereas fear faces indicate potential environmental threat perceived by the expressor. Thus, when coupled with direct gaze (i.e., eye contact with observer) anger faces should indicate more clearly that threat is directed at the observer, whereas when coupled with averted gaze (i.e., laterally shifted gaze) fear faces should indicate more clearly where in the environment that threat is located.

Consistent with these claims, recent research demonstrates that gaze direction differentially modulates the perceptual clarity of anger and fear facial displays. Anger faces coupled with direct gaze and fear faces coupled with averted gaze are recognized more quickly and accurately than either anger faces coupled with averted gaze or fear faces coupled with direct gaze (3). Thus, by manipulating the gaze direction of anger and fear displays, the current study examined the role of the amygdala in processing threat-related ambiguity. Because of the amygdala's demonstrated separate involvement in gaze direction and facial expression processing (4, 5), we identified this brain structure as particularly likely to be involved in their combined processing.

We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to test whether amygdala sensitivity to anger and fear displays would differentially vary as a function of gaze direction (6). Specifically, anger faces coupled with averted gaze and fear faces coupled with direct gaze (ambiguous threat) were predicted to elicit stronger amygdala responses than anger faces coupled with direct gaze and fear faces coupled with averted gaze (clear threat) (Fig. 1). To examine this relation, a two-by-two analysis of variance (anger/fear versus direct/averted gaze) was computed. Activation in the right amygdala was not found to differentially vary in response to anger and fear faces as a function of gaze direction. The predicted interaction, however, was found in the left amygdala, F(1,10) = 5.39, P < 0.05 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Amygdala response to emotional facial displays with direct and averted gaze. (A) Activation associated with contrast ambiguous threat (anger/averted and fear/direct) minus clear threat (anger/direct and fear/averted) (P < 0.01, uncorrected; left: –15, 0, –18). (B) Corresponding mean BOLD signal intensity changes in left amygdala during presentation of angry and fearful faces as a function of direct and averted gaze.

By merging the study of facial expressions with the study of gaze direction perception, the current research demonstrates an important interaction of these cues on amygdala functioning. This interaction highlights a role for the amygdala in discerning not only the presence of facially communicated threat but also in processing threat-related ambiguity. Consequently, this finding offers an explanation for why previous work has often failed to detect amygdala responsivity to anger displays, and it underscores the importance of incorporating gaze direction in future work on facial expression perception.

Supporting Online Material

www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/300/5625/1536/DC1

Fig. S1

References and Notes

Navigate This Article