Report

Force-Clamp Spectroscopy Monitors the Folding Trajectory of a Single Protein

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  12 Mar 2004:
Vol. 303, Issue 5664, pp. 1674-1678
DOI: 10.1126/science.1092497

Abstract

We used force-clamp atomic force micoscopy to measure the end-to-end length of the small protein ubiquitin during its folding reaction at the single-molecule level. Ubiquitin was first unfolded and extended at a high force, then the stretching force was quenched and protein folding was observed. The folding trajectories were continuous and marked by several distinct stages. The time taken to fold was dependent on the contour length of the unfolded protein and the stretching force applied during folding. The folding collapse was marked by large fluctuations in the end-to-end length of the protein, but these fluctuations vanished upon the final folding contraction. These direct observations of the complete folding trajectory of a protein provide a benchmarkto determine the physical basis of the folding reaction.

Resolving the folding pathway of a protein remains a challenge in biology (19). Here, we demonstrate a method by which the entire folding trajectory of a single protein can be recorded as a function of time. We used single-molecule atomic force micoscopy techniques (10, 11) in the force-clamp mode (12, 13) to apply a constant force to a single polyprotein composed of nine repeats of the small protein ubiquitin (1316). This resulted in the probabilistic unfolding of ubiquitin, which was observed as stepwise elongations of the protein in which each step corresponded to the unfolding of an individual protein module (12). We applied this technique to monitor the end-to-end length of a single ubiquitin polyprotein (17) during reversible unfolding-folding cycles. Our experimental approach is illustrated in Fig. 1. Figure 1A shows the changes in the length of a single ubiquitin polyprotein in response to the stretching force displayed in Fig. 1B. As shown, stretching the polyubiquitin chain at 120 pN triggers a series of unfolding events that appear as a staircase of 20-nm steps, marking the unfolding of the individual ubiquitins in the chain (Fig. 1A). After 4 s, the force was relaxed to 15 pN (Fig. 1B) (18), and we observed the protein spontaneously contract in stages until it reached its folded length (Fig. 1A). To confirm that the polyprotein had folded, we raised the stretching force back to 120 pN at 14 s (Fig. 1B) and observed the ubiquitin chain extend in steps of 20 nm back to its fully unfolded length (Fig. 1A). Hence, the spontaneous contraction of the protein observed upon reducing the force from 120 pN down to 15 pN corresponds to the folding trajectory of the mechanically unfolded ubiquitin.

Fig. 1.

The folding pathway of ubiquitin is directly measured by force-clamp spectroscopy. The figure shows our experimental protocol. (A) The end-to-end length of a protein as a function of time. (B) The corresponding applied force as a function of time. The inset in (A) shows a schematic of the events that occur at different times during the stretch-relaxation cycle (numbered from 1 to 5). Δzp, piezoelectric actuator displacement; Lc, contour length. The length of the protein (in nanometers) evolves in time as it first extends by unfolding at a constant stretching force of 122 pN. This stage is characterized by step increases in length of 20 nm each, marking each ubiquitin unfolding event, numbered 1 to 3. The first unfolding event (1) occurred very close to the beginning of the recording and therefore it is magnified with a logarithmic time scale (blue inset) with the length dimension plotted at half scale. Upon quenching the force to 15 pN, the protein spontaneously contracted, first in a steplike manner resulting from the elastic recoil of the unfolded polymer (4), and then by a continuous collapse as the protein folds (5). The complex time course of this collapse in the protein's length reflects the folding trajectory of ubiquitin at a low stretching force. To confirm that our polyubiquitin had indeed folded, at 14 s we stretched again back to 122 pN (B). The initial steplike extension is the elastic stretching of the folded polyubiquitin. Afterward, we observed steplike extension events of 20 nm each, corresponding to the unfolding of the ubiquitin proteins that had previously refolded. After these unfolding events, the length of the polyubiquitin is the same as that measured before the folding cycle began (3).

We observed and analyzed 81 folding events similar to those shown in Fig. 1. Two typical folding trajectories for mechanically unfolded polyubiquitin molecules are shown in Fig. 2. Most of the folding trajectories are qualitatively similar, following a continuous convex time course marked by abrupt changes in slope. However, we have never observed identical sets of trajectories, indicating the existence of multiple folding pathways for ubiquitin. To simplify the analysis of the folding trajectories, we divided their time course, roughly, into four distinct stages marked by abrupt changes in the slope of the collapse (Fig. 2). As an example, we analyze the recording shown in Fig. 2A. The first stage (1 in Fig. 2A and inset) is fast, lasting ∼10 ms, which is slower than the time it takes the force to reach its set point (∼3msin this experiment). The collapse rate for this stage (cr1 = 2135 nm/s) is within the range but clearly slower than the maximum rate of change, or slew rate (sr), of the feedback during this experiment (measured at sr = ∼8300 nm/s, after the molecule detached from the cantilever). This stage is likely to correspond to the elastic recoil of the unfolded polypeptide chain adjusting its length to the step change in the pulling force. This stage is always fast and is clearly marked in all recordings. The second stage begins at the end of the rapid elastic recoil and is marked by a noticeable increase in length fluctuations (Fig. 2A, inset). This stage relaxes into a long-lasting plateau with a slow rate of collapse measured at cr2 = 4.3 nm/s. The beginning of the third stage in this recording is distinguished by an abrupt increase in the slope of the collapse that now measures cr3 = 43 nm/s. Stages 2 and 3 can vary greatly in their rates of collapse (Fig. 3) and cannot always be distinguished (fig. S1). The final stage of collapse is always fast and appears almost steplike in most recordings. However, upon close inspection, the final stage is continuous and has a finite collapse rate of only cr4 = 1100 nm/s in the recording shown in Fig. 2A, and it is far from an all-or-none steplike event. This final stage (stage 4) is well defined in most recordings, with an average slope of cr4 = 585 ± 552 nm/s (±SD; n = 46).

Fig. 2.

Folding is characterized by a continuous collapse rather than by a discrete all-or-none process. (A) and (B) show typical recordings of the time course of the spontaneous collapse in the end-to-end length of an unfolded polyubiquitin, observed after quenching to a low force. (A) Four distinct stages can be identified. The first stage is fast and we interpret it as the elastic recoil of an ideal polymer chain (see magnified trace in the top inset). The next three stages are marked by abrupt changes in slope and correspond to the folding trajectory of ubiquitin. These stages can be distinguished by their different slopes. Stages 2 and 3 always show peak-to-peak fluctuations in length of several nanometers. The rapid final contraction of stage 4 marks the end of the folding event. This final collapse stage is not instantaneous, as can be seen on the magnified trace in the lower inset. We measure the total duration of the collapse, Δt, from the beginning of the quench until the end of stage 4. (B) The folding collapse is marked by large fluctuations in the length of the protein. These fluctuations greatly diminish in amplitude after folding is complete. The inset at the top is a record of the end-to-end fluctuations of the protein before the quench (region I), during the folding collapse (region II), and after folding was completed (region III). The fluctuations were obtained by measuring the residual from linear fits to the data (red dotted lines).

Fig. 3.

The duration of the folding collapse is force dependent. We show four different traces from ubiquitin chains for which we observed seven unfolding events (recorded at 100 to 120 pN) before relaxing the force. Hence, the unfolded length of all these recordings is comparable. (A) In the first recording, the force was quenched to ∼50 pN (downward arrow). An instantaneous elastic recoil was observed. However, the ubiquitin chain fails to fold, as evidenced by its constant length at this force. Upon restoration of a high stretching force (120 pN, upward arrow), the ubiquitin chain is observed to elastically extend back to its fully unfolded length. (B and C) Recordings similar to that shown in (A) (seven initial unfolding events), in which the force was quenched further down to ∼35 pN. In contrast to (A), the length of the ubiquitin chain was observed to spontaneously contract to the folded length. In (B), the folded ubiquitin chain was observed to unfold partially at the low force, whereas in (C) it remains folded until the high stretching force is restored (upward arrow). Several unfolding events mark this last stage, bringing the ubiquitin chain back to its unfolded length. (D) A case in which the force was quenched even further down to 23 pN. In this case, the folding collapse was completed in much less time (inset), clearly showing that the probability of observing a folding event as well as its duration is strongly force dependent.

A notable feature of the folding collapse is that stages 2 and 3 show very large fluctuations of the end-to-end length of the protein (∼16 nm peak to peak in the inset of Fig. 2B). The magnitude of these fluctuations abates quickly upon folding, as shown by the amplitude of the fluctuations in regions II and III of Fig. 2B. Although in this example the fluctuations appear relatively constant in region II, we also observed several cases in which the fluctuations grew in amplitude toward the end of region II and then disappeared upon folding. A detailed analysis of these fluctuations is beyond the scope of this work. Part of these length fluctuations must result from noise in the force signal, which becomes amplified by the increased slope of the length-force relationship at low pulling forces. However, it is hard to avoid the conclusion that most of these fluctuations represent a fundamental property of the unfolded polypeptide when it nears its final folding collapse. Although nearly all of the folding trajectories appear continuous and the stages of collapse are marked by abrupt changes in slope (Fig. 2), in 1 case out of 81 folding trajectories we observed a stepwise folding collapse (fig. S2). However, in this recording, only two ubiquitin modules refolded in three well-separated steplike events.

The total duration of a folding trajectory (Δt in Fig. 2A) is dependent on the stretching force. Figure 3 shows four folding trajectories at different forces. The downward arrows mark the time point when the stretching force was quenched to a low value (20 to 50 pN, Fig. 3). The immediate shortening of the protein's length marked by the downward arrows corresponds to the elastic recoil (stage 1, Fig. 2A), which is proportional to the magnitude of the quench (18).

A shallow quench to 50 pN fails to trigger folding, showing only stages 1 and 2 of a folding trajectory (Fig. 3A). In 51 recordings that showed trajectories that only reached stage 2, we never observed folding events (282 unfolding events, 0 folding events; fig. S3). By contrast, in 31 recordings in which the folding trajectories were interrupted at stage 3, folding became detectable (154 unfolding events, 11 folding events; fig. S4). In some of these trajectories that failed to fold, large fluctuations in the end-to-end length of the protein of more than 30 nm were observed throughout (trace 3 in fig. S4). As the magnitude of the quench grows, complete folding trajectories begin to appear and become shorter (35 pN, Fig. 3, B and C; 23 pN, Fig. 3D). The upward-pointing arrow marks the point at which the high stretching force was restored (100 to 120 pN, Fig. 3). After the high stretching force is restored, the ubiquitin chain regains the original unfolded length either very fast when it had failed to fold (simple elastic stretching, Fig. 3A; figs. S3 and S4) or more slowly through a staircase of 20-nm steps marking the unfolding of the refolded ubiquitins (Fig. 3, B to D).

From a series of experiments such as those shown in Fig. 3, we have determined that the collapse time is dependent on the pulling force applied during folding and also on the contour length of the unfolded polypeptide (Fig. 4). For example, at a stretching force of 30 to 40 pN, the folding time correlates with the unfolded contour length as Δt ≅ 0.027 × Lu (Fig. 4A). The slope of the time versus length curve is strongly dependent on the force applied during the folding collapse (Fig. 4A). However, because the folding time depends on the contour length as well, we plot the folding time as a function of force for proteins that have a contour length in the range of 150 to 200 nm (Fig. 4B). We can describe the force (F) dependency of the folding time by a simple exponential function as Δt ≅ 0.01 × exp(F × 0.2) (solid line in Fig. 4B). Both the length and force dependency can be approximated by Δt ≅ 3 × 10–5 × Lu × exp(F × 0.2). This description is far from unique, because in the absence of an explicit physical model for the folding collapse, the choice of any given function is arbitrary. Nonetheless, it is interesting to consider that models of polymer collapse predict that the time of collapse depends on the contour length of the polymer (19, 20). Resolving the exact form of the force and length dependency of the collapse will require a substantially improved set of data with less scatter. For example, for a quench to about 20 to 30 pN and at a relatively constant contour length (Fig. 4; 90 to 120 nm), the folding times range between 120 ms and up to ∼3 s. However, it is unclear whether this scatter is the result of different sets of folding trajectories that take very different times to resolve into an actual folding event or is due to experimental error.

Fig. 4.

The duration of the folding collapse is dependent on the protein length and the magnitude of the quench. The duration of the spontaneous collapse of an unfolded ubiquitin chain (Δt; Fig. 2A) depends on the total contour length of the mechanically unfolded polypeptide (A) and on the magnitude of the stretching force during refolding (B). (A) Three sets of recordings grouped by force range (10 to 20 pN, 20 to 30 pN, and 30 to 40 pN) and plotted against their contour length. The solid lines are linear fits to each set of data with values of 27 ms/nm (red line; 30 to 40 pN), 14 ms/nm (blue line; 20 to 30 pN), and 1.2 ms/nm (green line; 10 to 20 pN). To observe the force dependency we grouped the data from (A) at the highest range of contour lengths for which the effect of the force is most evident (150 to 200 nm). We observed that the duration of the folding collapse is exponentially dependent on the force (B), based on the equation Δt ≅ 0.01 × exp(F × 0.2) (green line).

We did not control the site from which we picked up the protein, and therefore, we obtained a random sample of single molecules containing anywhere between one and nine repeats (21). In most cases, we picked up three- to five-long ubiquitin chains, but we could easily obtain chains of up to seven (Fig. 3). In a few occasions (n = 5), we observed the folding trajectory for only one ubiquitin (Fig. 5). In these cases, we observed the same stages of collapse as before, except that the difference between stages 3 and 4 appeared to be discrete fluctuations in length that are sometimes clearly observed before the occurrence of stage 4 (Fig. 5, top two recordings). It is also notable that the final stage of the folding collapse is still rate-limited (Fig. 5, 160 nm/s in the top inset and 194 nm/s in the bottom inset) and much slower than the slew rate of the force clamp in those recordings (∼6000 nm/s; Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Two recordings of protein length (nm) as a function of time, showing the folding trajectory of a single ubiquitin. As before, stretching at a high force (100 pN) is followed by a quench to a low force of 26 pN that lasts 8 s, followed by restoration of the high stretching force up to 100 pN (bottom trace). In both cases, a single ubiquitin was observed to unfold at 100 pN. After the quench, the proteins undergo a spontaneous collapse into the folded state. Upon restretching, the folded ubiquitin is observed to elastically extend back to its folded length at 100 pN and then to unfold (second recording). Discrete fluctuations of several nanometers can be observed shortly before the final folding contraction. The final contraction occurred much faster than the previous stage; however, it had a finite rate (insets).

In contrast with the steplike folding reactions of an RNA hairpin placed under a stretching force (22), our measurement of the folding trajectories of mechanically unfolded proteins revealed a more complex phenomenon. Initially the collapse is very fast, driven by the elastic recoil, but then it is arrested into a slow stage that can take up to several seconds to resolve. At first glance, this suggests an intermediate state in the folding pathway (23). Indeed, ubiquitin is proposed to have such an intermediate (14). However, given that the slow stage of the collapse appears to be highly cooperative and lacks the features of Markovian kinetics, describing this stage as a kinetic intermediate may not be correct. Indeed, the time course of the observed folding trajectories is very different from those expected of a simple two-state folding reaction, which should be marked by stepwise shortening events as the individual ubiquitin proteins fold in the chain. Furthermore, the folding events are expected to occur stochastically, and hence they should be well separated in time. By contrast, the observed time course of the folding trajectory appears to be cooperative, in which most of the ubiquitin proteins in the chain follow similar folding stages at the same time. This is hard to explain unless the unfolded protein is behaving at least partially as a single polymer chain collapsing cooperatively.

Single-molecule force spectroscopy affords a high degree of control over the conformation of a protein. For example, stretching a fully unfolded ubiquitin chain by ∼100 to 120 pN causes the polypeptide to extend by >85 to 90% of its contour length (15). At these extensions, most or all of the secondary structure of a protein will be unraveled. Hence, the starting point of the folding trajectory is well defined as the point where the protein has been forced into a state in which all of the residues are exposed to the saline solution. Under these conditions, the unfolded ubiquitin chain can be considered as a polymer coil that is placed in a poor solvent. It is well known that polymers placed in a poor solvent undergo rapid collapse from a random coil into a condensed globular form [the so-called “coil-globule” phase transition (19, 20, 2428)]. Polymer collapse has been shown to occur in distinct stages that are qualitatively similar to the protein-folding trajectories demonstrated here (29). Furthermore, the large fluctuations in the end-to-end length of the protein that we observed in the folding trajectories are a characteristic of critical phenomena and have been observed in polymer chains just before undergoing a coil-globule phase transition. (30) Hence, the various stages of the folding collapse described here (stages 2, 3, and 4; Fig. 2) may correspond to those of a polymer undergoing a coil-globule phase transition. If this view is correct, the folding trajectories of all mechanically unfolded proteins will be very similar and would be identical to those of nonfolding polymers placed into a poor solvent solution. From this perspective, a folding transition state could only be reached after the end of stage 4 (Fig. 2). However, we know that ubiquitin folding is already observed in stage 3 of the folding trajectories (fig. S4B). Hence, it is premature to ascribe the folding trajectories that we observed solely to a polymer collapse mechanism (19, 20, 2428). Furthermore, simple polymer collapse would lead to a structureless condensed state that would include all of the unfolded ubiquitins in the chain. It is unlikely that only then, each unfolded ubiquitin would begin to search for its native conformation. The folding trajectories shown here are likely to be a more complex phenomenon in which the collapsing polypeptide rapidly begins to form bonds that limit the degrees of freedom of the collapsing chain, guiding the trajectory to the native state. For example, an all-atom simulation showed that the refolding pathway of a protein that had been mechanically stretched into a partially unfolded state involved the formation and rupture of specific hydrogen bonds (8). Lattice simulations have predicted that the radius of gyration (related to the end-to-end length) of a folding protein could follow a multiplicity of pathways with a time course that occurs in distinct stages (31). More recent simulations have predicted that after a rapid polymer collapse into a semicompact globule, the rate-limiting step for protein folding becomes the random search for any of thousands of transition states that can be reached from this semicompact form. Once a transition state is found, a rapid folding collapse ensues (4, 23, 32). This folding time course qualitatively reproduces the folding trajectories that we observed.

The direct observation of the folding trajectory of ubiquitin demonstrated here opens the way for a detailed study of protein-folding pathways. Our results contradict the generally held view that folding and unfolding reactions correspond to transitions between well-defined discrete states. In contrast, we observed that ubiquitin folding occurs through a series of continuous stages that cannot be easily represented by state diagrams. By studying how the folding trajectories respond to a variety of physical-chemical conditions (33), mutagenesis, and protein engineering (34), we may begin to identify the physical phenomena underlying each stage in these protein-folding trajectories.

Supporting Online Material

www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/303/5664/1674/DC1

Materials and Methods

Figs. S1 to S4

References

References and Notes

View Abstract

Navigate This Article