Visualization of Dislocation Dynamics in Colloidal Crystals

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  24 Sep 2004:
Vol. 305, Issue 5692, pp. 1944-1948
DOI: 10.1126/science.1102186


The dominant mechanism for creating large irreversible strain in atomic crystals is the motion of dislocations, a class of line defects in the crystalline lattice. Here we show that the motion of dislocations can also be observed in strained colloidal crystals, allowing detailed investigation of their topology and propagation. We describe a laser diffraction microscopy setup used to study the growth and structure of misfit dislocations in colloidal crystalline films. Complementary microscopic information at the single-particle level is obtained with a laser scanning confocal microscope. The combination of these two techniques enables us to study dislocations over a range of length scales, allowing us to determine important parameters of misfit dislocations such as critical film thickness, dislocation density, Burgers vector, and lattice resistance to dislocation motion. We identify the observed dislocations as Shockley partials that bound stacking faults of vanishing energy. Remarkably, we find that even on the scale of a few lattice vectors, the dislocation behavior is well described by the continuum approach commonly used to describe dislocations in atomic crystals.

Dislocations in a crystalline lattice are central to our understanding of yield, work hardening, fracture, fatigue, and time-dependent elasticity in atomic crystals (1). Such dislocations are line defects that mark the boundary of a surface at which one part of the crystal has been uniformly translated with respect to the other (24). A complete understanding of dislocations and their dynamics requires an analysis that bridges a range of length scales (5). On the atomic scale, the interatomic potential determines the structure of the dislocation core. On the medium-range scale, the strain field of the dislocations determines their interactions. On the macroscopic scale, the behavior of the dislocations determines the deformation of the crystal. It is difficult to observe dislocations simultaneously on these length scales. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is best suited for in situ observations on the medium-range scale. Computer simulations can bridge the length scales, but the size of their systems and length of the evolution time remain limited. Thus, there remains a need for techniques that link investigations of dislocations on these different length scales.

We show that colloidal crystals offer a unique opportunity for just such a bridging of length scales. Because colloidal particles are several orders of magnitude larger than atoms, they can be studied in real time and their positions in three dimensions can be determined accurately by confocal microscopy (6). Concentrated hard-sphere colloidal suspensions form crystals to increase their entropy, thereby lowering their free energy. Such crystals have a finite stiffness (7), which is essential for the existence of dislocations. To study these dislocations on the medium scale, we developed a laser diffraction microscopy (LDM) technique that images the strain field in a manner analogous to TEM in atomic systems. Confocal microscopy and LDM make a powerful combination for studying dislocation dynamics simultaneously over two qualitatively different length scales.

We focus on misfit dislocations formed when a film is grown via particle sedimentation on a substrate with a different lattice parameter. This configuration allows us to introduce the dislocations in a controlled way and to study nucleation and propagation of dislocations (8) during a process analogous to the industrially important epitaxial growth of thin atomic crystalline films. In thin epitaxial films, the misfit strain ϵ0 is accommodated purely elastically and results in a uniform strain ϵel. The total elastic energy increases linearly with the film thickness. At some critical thickness hc, the crystal can lower its energy by incorporating dislocations that relieve some of the elastic strain. As the film thickness increases, an increasing portion of the misfit strain is accommodated.

We determine the important parameters of the dislocation array: number per length, Burgers vector, position and range of the strain field, and mobility. We find that many of these features can be accounted for by the continuum theory used for epitaxial growth of atomic thin films. Some features, however, are unique to colloidal crystals, such as the negligibly small stacking fault energy and the slight variation of the lattice parameter with height (due to the pressure head of the upper layers).

We grow colloidal face-centered cubic (fcc) single crystals by slowly sedimenting colloidal particles onto a patterned template (9). We use silica particles with a diameter of 1.55 μm and a polydispersity of less than 3.5% (10). We prepare a pattern (11) with lattice constant d0 = 1.63 μm that nearly matches the equilibrium interparticle separation for colloidal crystals that are about 30 μm thick. This preferred lattice spacing changes slightly with film thickness as a result of the difference in the pressure head (12).

We add 3.5 ml of the dilute suspension, which after sedimentation gives rise to about 11 crystalline layers corresponding to a film 13 μm thick. After several days, we remove two-thirds of the supernatant and replace it with another dose of the dilute silica suspension. Using this procedure, we grow the crystal by 9-μm increments until the film is 31 μm thick.

We image dislocations in the crystalline films with a simple LDM setup that is inspired by the TEM techniques used to investigate dislocations in atomic systems (13). We use a HeNe laser with a wavelength of 632 nm, which scatters coherently from the colloidal crystal. When the incident beam is perpendicular to the template, a symmetric fcc (100) diffraction pattern is observed. By slightly tilting the sample to change the direction of the incident beam, we maximize the intensity in the (220) diffracted spot. We then use two lenses to project the light in the diffracted beam onto a screen (Fig. 1A). The image on the screen corresponds to a region in the crystal that is illuminated by the incident beam. A perfect crystal shows a uniformly bright image. When the crystal contains dislocations, however, dark lines appear in the image: The bending of lattice planes in the strain field of the dislocation gives rise to a local change in the Bragg condition and results in a dark line in the image of the diffracted beam. A LDM image of a 0.3 mm by 0.3 mm section of the colloidal crystal grown on the template with the ideal lattice constant d0 = 1.63 μm is shown in Fig. 1B. Even these crystals, grown on templates with an ideal lattice constant, contain some dislocations (indicated by arrows). Such dislocations are most frequently observed near the template border.

Fig. 1.

Laser diffraction microscopy (LDM) technique and images. (A) Schematic of the LDM instrument: A laser beam is sent through a colloidal crystal. One of the diffracted beams is imaged on a screen by means of an objective and a projector lens. (B and C) LDM images of the colloidal crystal grown on the template with the ideal lattice constant d0 = 1.63 μm. Arrows indicate dislocations. The upper left inset shows the diffraction pattern from the crystalline film; 0 indicates the transmitted beam, and an arrow indicates the diffracted beam used for imaging. The upper right inset illustrates the wave vectors of the incident and diffracted beams k0 and k, the diffraction vector q = kk0, and the corresponding reciprocal lattice vector g. In (B) the diffraction vector q coincides with the reciprocal lattice vector g and the diffracted beam intensity is maximum. In (C), the sample is tilted, so that q differs from g by the excitation error s = qg, which gives rise to an inversion of the image contrast. (D to G) LDM images of a colloidal crystalline film grown on a stretched template with lattice constant d1 = 1.65 μm. (D) and (E) show that using the (220) diffraction vector, which lies along the y direction, gives images of dislocations oriented in the x direction. (F) and (G) show that choosing the (220) diffraction vector, which lies along the x direction, images dislocations oriented in the y direction.

We can further exploit the analogy with the TEM technique and use contrast inversion to verify that the dark lines in Fig. 1B indeed result from scattering due to the dislocations. When the sample is tilted slightly further, the Bragg condition is no longer fulfilled in the perfect lattice and is instead locally satisfied in the region corresponding to the dislocation strain field. Thus, the image contrast on the screen inverts (Fig. 1C). The additional tilt of the sample introduces an excitation error, s = qg (Fig. 1C, upper right inset), which causes the intensity in the diffracted beam to decrease (Fig. 1C, upper left inset). Close to the dislocation, however, the bending of lattice planes locally scatters light into the direction of the diffracted beam, making the dark lines appear light.

To investigate the effect of a lattice mismatch, we grew a crystal on a template with lattice constant d1 = 1.65 μm, which is 1.5% larger than d0. The crystal grown on the stretched template exhibited a similarly low density of dislocations at a crystal thickness of 22 μm. Strikingly, as the crystal was grown to a thickness of 31 μm, a large number of dislocations nucleated and grew (Fig. 1, D and E). We determined the average dislocation line separation in the direction perpendicular to the dislocation lines, Λ, from the images. Λ–1 is the number of dislocations per unit length. Measuring Λ in three different 0.3 mm by 0.3 mm regions, we obtained an average value of 53 (±10) μm for the 31-μm crystal.

Remarkably, although the template was stretched in both spatial directions, dislocation lines were seen in one direction only (Fig. 1, D and E). The dislocation contrast is visible only if the particle displacements in the dislocation strain field have a component parallel to the diffraction vector used for imaging. The (220) diffraction vector chosen for imaging in Fig. 1, B to E, lies along the y direction; therefore, only lattice distortions with a component along the y direction showed up in the image. When we instead chose the (220) diffraction vector, which lies along the x direction, we observed a second set of dislocations (Fig. 1, F and G). Comparing the images in Fig. 1, D and F, we conclude that the strain field of the dislocations is strictly perpendicular to the imaged dislocation lines.

To elucidate the defect structure on the microscopic scale, we used confocal microscopy to image the individual particles and to determine their positions (6). The 31-μm-thick fcc colloidal crystal grown on the stretched template contains characteristic defects. At these defects, the nearest neighbor particle configuration changes so that particles have three opposing nearest neighbor pairs, as is the case in the hexagonal close-packed (hcp) lattice, rather than six as in the fcc lattice. A reconstruction of a 55 μmby55 μm by17 μm section of the crystal is shown in Fig. 2A. The x, y, and z axes correspond to the (110), (110), and (001) directions of the fcc lattice, respectively. Particles with three opposing nearest neighbor pairs are shown in red, and those with six opposing nearest neighbor pairs in blue. The red particles lie along intersecting planes embedded in the fcc lattice. By displaying only the red particles, we show that the planes are hcp (Fig. 2B). The red planes sandwich a stacking fault where the stacking order of the hcp planes changes from ABCABCABC to ABCBCABCA. The stacking fault lies along the (111) plane where the dislocations move most easily as a result of the shallow potential wells. This defines the glide plane of the dislocations in the fcc structure.

Fig. 2.

(A) Reconstruction of a 55 μm by 55 μm by 17 μm section of the colloidal crystal grown on the stretched template. The red particles delineate stacking faults embedded in an otherwise perfect fcc lattice. (B) Crystal reconstruction showing only the particles adjacent to the stacking faults. (C) A reconstructed y-z section through a stacking fault. The stacking fault is terminated by a Shockley partial dislocation whose core position is indicated by ±. The red loop indicates a Burgers circuit. The upper right inset is a three-dimensional illustration of the fcc unit cell. The y-z plane is gray; the hcp plane parallel to the stacking fault is red.

For a closer look at the strain field associated with the stacking faults, we display a typical y-z cut through a stacking fault. The fault ends above the template and is terminated by a dislocation (Fig. 2C). The first row of particles sits in the template holes. In the second row of particles, we recognize the emergence of a strain field in the y-z plane associated with a dislocation line oriented perpendicular to this plane. The dislocation core (±) lies about two lattice constants above the template. The Burgers circuit illustrated by the red line, which would close in the perfect lattice, exhibits a closure failure around the dislocation core. The Burgers vector b, which connects the starting and ending points of the Burgers circuit, is 1/6(112). This type of dislocation is known as a Shockley partial dislocation and is the most prominent dislocation observed in fcc metals (14). In metals, Shockley partial dislocations usually appear in pairs, held together by a stacking fault of nonzero energy. In contrast, in the hard-sphere colloidal crystal, the stacking faults extend to the crystal surface. This difference results from the vanishingly low energy cost associated with stacking faults in hard-sphere crystals (15), where second nearest neighbor interactions are almost negligible.

To calculate the critical film thickness hc, where the crystal starts to nucleate dislocations in order to relieve some of the elastic strain, we consider the crystalline film to be an isotropic, linear elastic medium with Young modulus E, shear modulus μ, and Poisson ratio ν. The widely used one-dimensional dislocation models for misfit dislocations in atomic thin films (16, 17) give hc = μb ln(R/rc)/[4πEϵ0(1 – ν) cos α], where rc and R are the core and outer radii of the dislocation strain field, respectively (18), ϵ0 is the misfit strain imposed by the template, and α is the angle between the Burgers vector and its projection onto the template. We take rc to be b/4 (1, 19), R to be the film thickness (17), and ϵ0 to be 0.015. Because E/μ = 2(1 + ν) for an isotropic elastic medium (1) and the Poisson ratio can be set at ν = 1/3 (7), we find hc = 22 μm. Consistent with this prediction, at a thickness of 22 μm the colloidal crystalline film is still free of dislocations. However, as the film thickness is increased to 31 μm, the film develops a large number of dislocations (Fig. 1, D to G), again consistent with the model. The misfit strain associated with the dislocations is ϵ = b cos α/Λ. Using b = 0.94 μm, cos Embedded Image, and Λ = 53 μm, we find ϵ = 0.010, which corresponds to two-thirds of the total misfit strain ϵ0 = 0.015 (20).

A further test of the continuum model is to calculate the height at which the dislocations rest above the template. A dislocation is driven toward the template by the force Embedded Image, which results from the elastic stress in the layers below the dislocation core, which are still strained (21). The boundary condition, set by the requirement that the particles in the first layer must adopt the template spacing, gives rise to an image force that repels the dislocation away from the template. The image force acting on a dislocation whose Burgers vector b′ is parallel to the template and whose core rests at a distance z above the template is Fi = μb2/[4π(1 – ν)z] (1). We estimate this force for our system by neglecting the vertical component of the Burgers vector and taking b′ = b cos α. The image force balances the elastic force when the dislocation rests at a distance z0 = μ(b cos α)2/[2πΛE(1 – ν)ϵ02] from the template. Using Λ = 53 μm, b = 0.94, cos Embedded Image, and ϵ0 = 0.015, we find z0 = 2.1 μm, in good agreement with our observation of z0 = 3 μm. Thus, surprisingly, the predictions of continuum theory, which are typically applied on length scales above 100 lattice constants, hold even for a very small number of layers.

We also used LDM to study the dislocation dynamics during the epitaxial growth of the film. We started with a crystal 22 μm thick, added a final dose of particles, waited 14 hours, and then tracked the evolution of dislocations over a period of 2.5 hours (movie S1). Three snapshots from the movie are shown in Fig. 3, A to C. The images show the spreading of existing dislocations and the nucleation and growth of new ones. Figure 4A shows the dislocation length as a function of time for the four dislocations indicated in Fig. 3C. Initially, the dislocations grow rapidly, at a rate of about 1 μm s–1. As the dislocation length increases, however, the growth rate decreases and eventually falls to zero.

Fig. 3.

(A to C) Snapshots from an LDM movie (movie S1) taken during the epitaxial growth of a colloidal crystal film grown on the stretched template. The time t0 corresponds to 14 hours after adding a final dose of particles. The dots in (C) mark four dislocations whose growth is tracked and displayed in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

(A) Length versus time for the four dislocations marked in Fig. 3C. (B) Schematic diagram of a dislocation line that lies in a hcp plane shown in red. The dislocation edge segment runs parallel to the template and joins two screw segments that terminate at the crystal surface. The forces acting on the dislocation line are marked. (C) The symbols indicate the rescaled dislocation length L/Linf versus rescaled time t/τ for the four growth curves marked in (A). The solid line is the theoretical prediction of the model and has the functional form [1 – exp(t/τ)].

To quantitatively analyze this spreading behavior, it is necessary to account for the forces acting on a dislocation. A diagram depicting a typical dislocation line in our thin film is shown in Fig. 4B. The dislocation consists of an edge segment that runs parallel to the template and joins two screw segments that terminate at the crystal surface. The edge dislocation expands through the lateral motion of the screw segments (22). Figure 4B also depicts the forces acting on one of the screw segments. The expansion of a dislocation is driven by the Peach-Koehler force FPK due to the elastic stress (22) and is resisted by the dislocation line tension Fl (1) and a drag force Fd associated with moving the screw segment through the crystal. For colloidal crystals, Fd has been shown to be the dominant force associated with the motion of such screw dislocations (19). At the onset of dislocation growth, we estimated the magnitude of each of the forces to be on the order of 100 f N. The length of a dislocation as a function of time can be calculated from the force balance, FPK = Fl + Fd (23). As the dislocation grows and accommodates an increasing portion of the misfit strain, the elastic force driving the expansion decreases. Thus, the force balance predicts that L = Linf[1 – exp(–t/τ)], where Linf is the final dislocation length and τ is a constant, proportional to the ratio of the viscosity of the solvent to the elastic modulus.

To test this prediction, we scaled the entire data set and plotted L/Linf versus t/τ (Fig. 4C). The data are in excellent agreement with the theoretical prediction. As a final check, we used the average value of τ, which we determined to be 130 (±40) s, to estimate the elastic modulus of the colloidal crystal (23). This estimate yields a value of 0.3 Pa, in reasonable agreement with theoretical estimates that predict a value on the order of 1 Pa (7). This is one of the only techniques available for directly determining the elastic modulus of thin colloidal crystal films.

The combination of imaging techniques presented and the close similarity of dislocations in colloidal and atomic crystals lays the groundwork for investigating further important phenomena that cannot be directly studied on the atomic scale, such as the nucleation and interaction of dislocations in very constrained systems. The remarkable and unexpected correspondence between continuum model predictions and the phenomena we observe on the scale of just a few lattice constants suggests that continuum models may also be applied to describe dislocation behavior even in highly constrained structures, such as those being made as nanoscale science pushes to ever smaller devices. Finally, the effects of the vanishing stacking fault energy and the pressure head on dislocations in colloidal crystals highlight some of the unique features of this class of condensed matter.

Supporting Online Material

Movie S1

References and Notes

Stay Connected to Science

Navigate This Article