Report

Bruchpilot Promotes Active Zone Assembly, Ca2+ Channel Clustering, and Vesicle Release

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  19 May 2006:
Vol. 312, Issue 5776, pp. 1051-1054
DOI: 10.1126/science.1126308

Abstract

The molecular organization of presynaptic active zones during calcium influx–triggered neurotransmitter release is the focus of intense investigation. The Drosophila coiled-coil domain protein Bruchpilot (BRP) was observed in donut-shaped structures centered at active zones of neuromuscular synapses by using subdiffraction resolution STED (stimulated emission depletion) fluorescence microscopy. At brp mutant active zones, electron-dense projections (T-bars) were entirely lost, Ca2+ channels were reduced in density, evoked vesicle release was depressed, and short-term plasticity was altered. BRP-like proteins seem to establish proximity between Ca2+ channels and vesicles to allow efficient transmitter release and patterned synaptic plasticity.

Synaptic communication is mediated by the fusion of neurotransmitter-filled vesicles with the presynaptic membrane at the active zone, a process triggered by Ca2+ influx through clusters of voltage-gated channels (1, 2). The spacing between Ca2+ channels and vesicles at active zones is particularly thought to influence the dynamic properties of synaptic transmission (3).

The larval Drosophila neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is frequently used as a model of glutamatergic synapses (4, 5). The monoclonal antibody Nc82 specifically stains individual active zones (fig. S1A) (6, 7) by recognizing a coiled-coil domain protein of roughly 200 kD named Bruchpilot (BRP) (6). BRP shows homologies to the mammalian active zone components CAST [cytoskeletal matrix associated with the active zone (CAZ)–associated structural protein] (8), also called ERC (ELKS, Rab6-interacting protein 2, and CAST) (9). Whereas confocal microscopy recognized diffraction limited spots, the subdiffraction resolution of stimulated emission depletion (STED) fluorescence microscopy (10, 11) revealed donut-shaped BRP structures at active zones (Fig. 1A). Viewed perpendicular to the plane of synapses, both single and multiple “rings” were uncovered, of similar size to freeze-fracture-derived estimates of fly active zones (12) (average length of isolated rings was 0.191 ± 0.002 μm, n = 204; average length of single rings of double ring structures was 0.148 ± 0.002 μm, n = 426; average length of double rings was 0.297 ± 0.005, n = 213) (fig. S1B). The donuts were up to 0.16 μm high, as judged by images taken parallel to the synaptic plane (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1.

Junctional and ultrastructural assembly in mutants of the active zone component BRP. (A) Unlike confocal, STED microscopy revealed donut-shaped structures recognized by Nc82. Viewed from above, both single (white arrows) and clusters of multiple rings (arrowheads) were identified. The red arrow indicates a synapse viewed parallel to the synaptic plane. (B) Individual synapses of control animals were labeled by Nc82, whereas brp mutant synapses completely lacked the Nc82 signal, which could be partially restored by re-expressing the brp cDNA in the brp mutant background with use of the neuron-specific driver line ok6-GAL4. (C) Staining with a neuronal membrane marker (anti–horseradish peroxidase) demonstrated normal morphological organization of brp NMJs. (D) Receptor fields were surrounded by the typical perisynaptic expression of the neuronal cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) homolog FasciclinII (FasII) in both brp mutants and controls. (A) to (D) are projections of confocal stacks. Scale bars represent in (A), 1 μm; (B), 4 μm; (C), 20 μm; and (D), 2 μm. (E) Electron micrograph of a control type Ib bouton with synapses (arrowheads) presynaptically decorated with T-bars (arrows). (F) A brp mutant bouton showing an overall normal organization but without T-bars. (G) Serial sections of a control synapse. A T-bar can be observed in two consecutive sections (arrows). (H) Serial sections of a representative brp mutant synapse completely lacking a T-bar and revealing presynaptic membrane rufflings (asterisks). Scale bars in (G) and (H), 250 nm.

BRP seemed to demark individual active zones associated with clusters of Ca2+ channels. Transposon-mediated mutagenesis allowed us to isolate a mutant chromosome (brp69) in which nearly the entire open reading frame of BRP was deleted (fig. S1C). brp mutants [brp69/df(2R)BSC29] developed into mature larvae but did not form pupae. The Nc82 label was completely lost from the active zones of brp mutant NMJs but could be restored by re-expressing the brp cDNA (6) in the brp mutant background with use of the neuron-specific driver lines ok6-GAL4 (Fig. 1B) or elav-GAL4. This also rescued larval lethality. Mutants had slightly smaller NMJs (average control size was 780.0 ± 35.8 μm2, n = 14; average brp size was 593.3 ± 29.1 μm2, n = 12; P = 0.0013) (Fig. 1C) and somewhat fewer individual synapses (average synapse number for control was 411.1 ± 41.5, n = 9; for brp, 296.3 ± 28.9; n = 8; P = 0.036). However, individual receptor fields, identified by the glutamate receptor subunit GluRIID (13), were enlarged in brp mutants (average field size in control was 0.43 ± 0.02 μm2, n = 9; in brp, 0.64 ± 0.03 μm2; n = 8; P < 0.001) (Fig. 1D). Thus, principal synapse formation occurred in brp mutants, with individual postsynaptic receptor fields increased in size but moderately decreased in number.

In electron micrographs of brp mutant NMJs, synapses with pre- and postsynaptic membranes in close apposition were present at regular density (Fig. 1, F and H), and consistent with the enlarged glutamate receptor fields (Fig. 1D) postsynaptic densities appeared larger while otherwise normal (Fig. 1F). However, intermittent rufflings of the presynaptic membrane were noted (Fig. 1H), and brp mutants completely lacked presynaptic dense projections (T-bars). Occasionally, very little residual electron-dense material attached to the presynaptic active zone membrane was identified (fig. S2B). After re-expressing the BRP protein in the mutant background, T-bar formation could be partially restored (fig. S2C), although these structures were occasionally somewhat aberrant in shape. Thus, BRP assists in the ultrastructural assembly of the active zone and is essential for T-bar formation.

In brp mutant larvae we noted a drastic decrease in evoked excitatory junctional current (eEJC) amplitudes (Fig. 2A) by using two-electrode voltage clamp recordings of postsynaptic currents at low stimulation frequencies (elav-GAL4 background control, –89.3 ± 3.4 nA; brp, –32.1 ± 5.9 nA; n = 10 each; P < 0.001; ok6-GAL4 background control, –89.6 ± 4.4 nA; n = 9; brp, –32.8 ± 3.7 nA; n = 10; P < 0.001). This drop in current amplitude could be partially rescued through brp re-expression within the presynaptic motoneurons by using either elav-GAL4 or ok6-GAL4 (elav-GAL4, –55.5 ± 4.3 nA; n = 11; P = 0.01; ok6-GAL4, –62.2 ± 5.3 nA; n = 10; P = 0.002) (Fig. 2A). In contrast, the amplitude of miniature excitatory junctional currents (mEJCs) in response to single, spontaneous vesicle fusion events was increased over control levels (control, –0.84 ± 0.06 nA; brp, –1.17 ± 0.05 nA; n = 10 each; P = 0.004) (Fig. 2B). This is consistent with the enlarged individual glutamate receptor fields of brp mutants (Fig. 1D) and excludes a lack of postsynaptic sensitivity as the cause of the reduced eEJC amplitudes.

Fig. 2.

Electrophysiological characterization of brp mutant NMJs. (A) (Top) Average traces of eEJCs at 0.2 Hz nerve stimulation and (bottom) mean eEJC amplitudes of control (dark gray), brp mutant (white), and rescued animals (light gray) carrying either a copy of elav-GAL4 or ok6-GAL4. (B) Sample traces of mEJCs and a cumulative histogram of the amplitude distribution (0.05 nA bins). The average mEJC amplitude was increased in brp mutants, whereas the frequency was not significantly altered. Quantal content of brp NMJs was significantly reduced with respect to controls. (C) Average scaled eEJCs (control, black; brp, gray) illustrate the delayed release in brp mutants compared to controls. Although the rise time of eEJCs was significantly increased at brp NMJs, the rise time of mEJCs was indistinguishable from the control. The decay time constant (τ) of eEJCs was not significantly altered at brp synapses (τ control: 7.7 ± 0.6 ms; τ brp:8.9 ± 0.7 ms; n = 10 each, P = 0.104), whereas mEJCs decayed with a slightly but significantly longer τ in the mutant than in the control (τ control: 7.0 ± 0.3 ms; τ brp: 8.0 ± 0.4 ms; n = 10 each, P = 0.045). One asterisk indicates P ≤ 0.05, two asterisks, P ≤ 0.01; and three asterisks, P ≤ 0.001. Error bars indicate SEM.

It follows that the number of vesicles released per presynaptic action potential (AP) (quantal content) was severely compromised at brp mutant NMJs (control, 109 ± 5.7; brp, 28 ± 5.2; n = 10 each; P < 0.001) (Fig. 2B) and could not be attributed solely to the moderate decrease in synapse number. The ultrastructural defects of brp mutant synapses may interfere with the proper targeting of vesicles to the active zone membrane and thereby impair exocytosis. The number of vesicles directly docked to active zone membranes was slightly decreased in brp mutants (control average of 1.10 ± 0.13 from 51 active zones, n = 3; brp average of 0.87 ± 0.09 from 89 active zones, n = 4; P = 0.53). However, the amplitude distribution and sustained frequency of mEJCs (control, 1.55 ± 0.33 Hz; brp, 1.87 ± 0.15 Hz; n = 10 each; P = 0.186) (Fig. 2B) illustrated that brp mutant synapses did not appear to suffer from extrasynaptic release, as would be caused by a misalignment of vesicle fusion sites with postsynaptic receptors. Consistent with the appropriate deposition of exo- and endocytotic proteins, an apparently normal distribution of Syntaxin, Dap160, and Dynamin (fig. S3) was observed at brp mutant synapses.

The exact amplitude and time course of AP-triggered Ca2+ influx in the nerve terminal governs the amplitude and time course of vesicle release (14). Nerve-evoked responses of brp mutants were delayed (rise time of 2.53 ± 0.37 ms, n = 10) when compared with controls (rise time of 1.11 ± 0.05 ms, n = 10, P < 0.001), whereas in contrast mEJC rise times were unchanged (control, 1.06 ± 0.04 ms; brp, 1.06 ± 0.03 ms; n = 10 each) (Fig. 2C). Thus, evoked vesicle fusion events were less synchronized with the invasion of the presynaptic terminal by an AP. Spatiotemporal changes in Ca2+ influx have a profound effect on short-term plasticity (1517). Whereas at 10 Hz controls (n = 18) exhibited substantial short-term depression of eEJC amplitudes, brp mutants (n = 15) showed strong initial facilitation before stabilizing at a slightly lower but frequency-dependent steady-state current (control at 10 Hz, –54.7 ± 3.3 nA; brp, –35.6 ± 3.0 nA; P < 0.001) (Fig. 3A). As judged by the initial facilitation at 10 Hz, neither a reduction in the number of releasable vesicles nor available release sites could fully account for the low quantal content of brp mutants at moderate stimulation frequencies. Furthermore, the altered short-term plasticity of brp mutant synapses suggested a change in the highly Ca2+-dependent vesicle release probability (18). Paired-pulse protocols were applied to the NMJ (Fig. 3B). Closely spaced stimuli lead to a buildup of residual Ca2+ in the vicinity of presynaptic Ca2+ channels, enhancing the probability of a vesicle within this local Ca2+ domain to undergo fusion after the next pulse (19). The absence of marked facilitation at control synapses (ratio at 30-ms interval of 1.1 ± 0.03) could be explained by a depletion of release-ready vesicles (20). At brp mutant NMJs, however, the prominent facilitation at short interpulse intervals (ratio at 30-ms interval of 2.0 ± 0.13, P < 0.001) illustrated that the enhancement of release probability strongly outweighed the depletion of releasable vesicles. Thus, initial vesicle release probability was low, and release at brp synapses particularly benefited from the accumulation of intracellular Ca2+.

Fig. 3.

Impaired vesicle release in brp mutants is caused by a mislocalization of presynaptic Ca2+ channels. (A) A 10-Hz stimulation revealed transient short-term facilitation of brp mutant currents (white circles) and the absence of a frequency-dependent depression of steady-state current amplitudes when compared with controls (black circles) (n ≥ 10 per genotype at each frequency). (B) Average currents after paired-pulse stimulation at an interval of 30 ms normalized to the amplitude of the first pulse (control, black; brp, gray) and paired-pulse ratios at varying intervals demonstrate pronounced potentiation at brp NMJs (n = 9 per genotype at each interval). (C) Examples of nerve-evoked local postsynaptic currents recorded with a focal electrode (36, 37) at indicated time points (in seconds) after bath application of EGTA-AM. The bar chart illustrates the severe reduction of current amplitudes in brp mutants 5000 s after EGTA-AM wash-in. The values are normalized to the initial eEJC amplitude. (D) Projections of confocal stacks displaying the NMJ (top images; scale bar, 10 μm) and several boutons (lower images; scale bar, 2 μm) reveal weak CacGFP signal at brp mutant synapses. Quantification of CacGFP intensity averaged over the entire NMJs [control, 31.1 ± 2.4 arbitrary units (a.u.); n = 13; brp, 18.0 ± 2.0 a.u.; n = 10; P = 0.0017] or only synaptic areas (control, 52.6 ± 1.2 a.u.; n = 421 synapses; brp, 25.3 ± 0.8 a.u.; n = 320 synapses; P < 0.001, student t test) included as bar charts. One asterisk indicates P ≤ 0.05; two asterisks, P ≤ 0.01; and three asterisks, P ≤ 0.001. Error bars indicate SEM.

Vesicle fusion is highly sensitive to the spacing between Ca2+ channels and vesicles at release sites (3). It has been calculated that doubling this distance from 25 to 50 nm decreases the release probability threefold (21), and the larger this distance, the more effective the slow synthetic Ca2+ buffer EGTA [ethyleneglycol-bis(β-aminoethyl)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid] should become in suppressing release (22). Indeed, after bath application of membrane permeable EGTA-AM (tetraacetoxymethyl ester of EGTA), the reduction of evoked vesicle release was more pronounced at brp mutant than at control NMJs (control, 64.2 ± 13.8%; brp, 16.7 ± 8.8%; n = 6 each; P = 0.026) (Fig. 3C).

The Ca2+-channel subunit Cacophony governs release at Drosophila NMJs (23, 24). By using a fully functional, GFP (green fluorescent protein)–labeled variant (CacGFP) (25), we visualized Ca2+ channels in vivo (26). Consistently, Ca2+ channel expression was severely reduced over the entire NMJ and at synapses lacking BRP (Fig. 3D).

Thus, we conclude that brp mutants suffered from a diminished vesicle release probability due to a decrease in the density of presynaptic Ca2+ channel clusters. It is conceivable that BRP tightly surrounds but is not part of the T-bar structure, contained within the unlabeled center of donuts. BRP may establish a matrix, required for both T-bar assembly as well as the appropriate localization of active zone components including Ca2+ channels, possibly by mediating their integration into a restricted number of active zone slots (27). Related mechanisms might underlie functional impairments of mammalian central synapses lacking active zone components (28) and natural physiological differences between synapse types (17). Electron microscopy has identified regular arrangements at active zones of mammalian CNS (central nervous system) synapses (“particle web”) (29) and frog NMJs (“ribs”) (30), where these structures have also been proposed to organize Ca2+ channel clustering. At calyx of Held synapses, both a fast and a slow component of exocytosis have been described (31). The fast component recovers slowly and is believed to owe its properties to vesicles attached to a matrix tightly associated with Ca2+ channels (32), whereas the slow component recovers faster (31) and is thought to be important for sustaining vesicle release during tetanic stimulation. In agreement with this concept, the absence or impairment of such a matrix at brp synapses has a profound effect on vesicle release at low stimulation frequencies, but this effect subsides as the frequency increases (Fig. 3A). The sustained frequency of mEJCs at brp synapses could be explained if spontaneous fusion events arise from the slow release component (33) or a pathway independent of evoked vesicle fusion (34).

Synapses lacking BRP and T-bars exhibited a defective coupling of Ca2+ influx with vesicle fusion, whereas the vesicle availability did not appear rate-limiting under low frequency stimulation. The activity-induced addition of presynaptic dense bodies has been proposed to elevate vesicle release probability (35). Our work supports this hypothesis and suggests an involvement of BRP or related factors in synaptic plasticity by promoting Ca2+ channel clustering at the active zone membrane.

Supporting Online Material

www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/1126308/DC1

Materials and Methods

Figs. S1 to S3

References

References and Notes

View Abstract

Navigate This Article