Report

Frequency Ratio of Al+ and Hg+ Single-Ion Optical Clocks; Metrology at the 17th Decimal Place

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  28 Mar 2008:
Vol. 319, Issue 5871, pp. 1808-1812
DOI: 10.1126/science.1154622

This article has a correction. Please see:

Abstract

Time has always had a special status in physics because of its fundamental role in specifying the regularities of nature and because of the extraordinary precision with which it can be measured. This precision enables tests of fundamental physics and cosmology, as well as practical applications such as satellite navigation. Recently, a regime of operation for atomic clocks based on optical transitions has become possible, promising even higher performance. We report the frequency ratio of two optical atomic clocks with a fractional uncertainty of 5.2 × 10–17. The ratio of aluminum and mercury single-ion optical clock frequencies νAl+Hg+ is 1.052871833148990438(55), where the uncertainty comprises a statistical measurement uncertainty of 4.3 × 10–17, and systematic uncertainties of 1.9 × 10–17 and 2.3 × 10–17 in the mercury and aluminum frequency standards, respectively. Repeated measurements during the past year yield a preliminary constraint on the temporal variation of the fine-structure constant α of Embedded Image.

Time is the physical coordinate over which humans have the least control, and yet it is the most accurately realized fundamental unit. Although any physical system that evolves predictably can serve as a time base, isolated atoms have long been recognized as near-ideal references for laboratory clocks, due to the abundance of identical copies, as well as their relative immunity to environmental changes. Because the forces within isolated atoms are many orders of magnitude larger than the external forces perturbing them, atomic resonance frequencies are affected only slightly by external fields. Yet even the small perturbations caused by external fields limit the accuracy of all atomic clocks.

In the work reported here, we combine recent advances in optical and atomic physics to construct atomic clocks based on optical transitions in trapped 199Hg+ and 27Al+ ions, and measure their frequency ratio. Quantum-jump spectroscopy of single ions (1, 2) and subhertz lasers (3, 4), together with the femtosecond laser frequency comb (5, 6), allowed the first demonstration of an all-optical atomic clock (7), which was based on 199Hg+. The development of quantum logic spectroscopy (8) has enabled the use of 27Al+ as a frequency standard (9), an ion that is highly immune to external field perturbations (10), but whose internal state is difficult to detect by conventional methods.

In each of the standards, the frequency that we attempt to produce in the laboratory is the resonance frequency of the unperturbed ion, at rest and in the absence of background electric and magnetic fields. The deviations from this ideal condition produce shifts that are subtracted from the frequencies of two standards, to the degree that they are known (Table 1). The overall uncertainty in these shifts determines the final accuracy of each frequency standard. Although the specifics of the two standards are quite different, their respective systematic fractional frequency uncertainty is similar: 1.9 × 10–17 for 199 Hg+ and 2.3 × 10–17 for 27Al+. Importantly, none of the current uncertainties are fundamental limits, and both standards can be improved substantially in the future, with a potential accuracy of 10–18 or better (1, 11). The ratio of frequencies for the two optical clocks νAl+Hg+ reported here marks an order-of-magnitude improvement in achievable measurement accuracy (12). As each of these clocks has an accuracy that exceeds current realizations of the SI unit of time, we report the ratio of these optical frequencies, thereby avoiding the uncertainty (3.3 × 10–16) of the currently realized SI second (13).

Table 1.

27Al+1S03P0 and 199Hg+2S1/22D5/2 clock shifts (Δν), and uncertainties (σ) in units of 10–18 of fractional frequency. AOM, Accousto-optic modulator.

View this table:

Until recently, such an optical frequency–ratio measurement (Fig. 1) would have required large and costly frequency-multiplication chains to translate between the microwave domain of electronic frequency counters and the optical domain of the clock resonances. The development of tabletop femtosecond laser frequency combs (femtosecond combs) allows this translation to occur in a single, phase-coherent, convenient, and robust step. Here, the fourth harmonics of two clock lasers are locked to the mercury and aluminum clock transitions at 282 and 267 nm, respectively. An octave-spanning self-referenced Ti:Sapphire femtosecond comb (14) is phase-locked to one clock laser, and the heterodyne beat-note of the other clock laser with the nearest comb tooth is measured. The various beat-note and offset frequencies are combined to yield the unitless frequency ratio (12). In recent comparisons of the frequencies of the two optical clocks described here, a fiber laser femtosecond comb (15) has provided a second independent measure of the frequency ratio.

Fig. 1.

Frequency ratio measurement system for the comparison of 199Hg+ and 27Al+ optical clock frequencies. (Left) The fourth harmonic of a 1126-nm wavelength infrared (IR) laser drives atomic-state transitions in a 199Hg+ ion (40-ms probe time, 70% duty cycle). The transition rate yields an error signal to keep the laser frequency locked to the atomic resonance. (Right) A 1070-nm wavelength IR laser performs the same function for 27Al+ (100-ms probe time, 45% duty cycle), which is coupled to a nearby 9Be+ ion by their mutual Coulomb repulsion for the purposes of sympathetic cooling and internal state detection. Both lasers are prestabilized to ultralow-expansion glass Fabry-Perot cavities (purple and green ellipsoids), thereby narrowing their linewidth to about 1 Hz (4). Boxes marked “×2” are second-harmonic generation stages to convert IR light first to visible and then to ultraviolet wavelengths. The two laser frequencies are compared by means of a femtosecond comb (12), to which both clock laser systems are linked by 300-m lengths of actively phase-stabilized optical fiber. The quantities fb,Hg (beat note of the mercury clock laser with spectral component n of femtosecond comb), fb,Al (beat note of the aluminum clock laser with spectral component m of the femtosecond comb), fceo (femtosecond comb carrier-envelope-offset), and frep (femtosecond comb repetition rate) comprise the frequency ratio measurement (12).

The 27Al+1S03 P0 standard, which uses quantum logic spectroscopy (8), has been described previously (9). One 27Al+ ion is trapped together with a 9Be+ ion, which provides sympathetic Doppler laser cooling as well as the means for internal-state detection of the 27Al+ ion's clock state (1S0 or 3P0). The 27Al+ clock state is mapped to detectable states in 9Be+ repetitively through the ions' coupled motion, allowing for up to 99.94% clock state detection fidelity (16). With the ability to detect the clock state comes the ability to detect state transitions, whose probability depends on the clock laser frequency. The frequency of the clock laser is locked to the atomic transition by alternating between upper and lower slopes of the atomic resonance curve and applying frequency-feedback to keep the transition rates equal. At the operating magnetic field of 0.1 mT, the Zeeman structure due to the nuclear spin of 5/2 is split by several kilohertz, and the individual Zeeman components are well resolved. The clock alternates every 4 s between π-polarized transitions with extreme states of opposite angular momentum (mF = ±5/2), which allows compensation of magnetic field shifts to first and second order (9, 17).

The accuracy of the aluminum standard is limited to 2.3 × 10–17 (Table 1), due primarily to uncertainties in the relativistic time dilation, or second-order Doppler shift, caused by microscopic movement of the ion in its trap, with root mean square (RMS) velocities of v = 1 to 2 m/s. According to special relativity, moving clocks are observed to run more slowly than stationary ones, with a fractional frequency shift of –v2/(2c2). For ions confined in Paul traps, there are two types of motion: secular motion, which is the harmonic motion of the trapped particle, and micromotion, which occurs in part when the ion is displaced from the null of the radiofrequency (RF) confining field by slowly fluctuating electric fields.

These quasistatic fields are monitored and nulled by interleaving micromotion test experiments with the clock interrogations. Tests are performed by measuring the strength of radial-to-axial coupling of certain normal modes via 9 Be+ (18); nulling is accomplished by applying compensation potentials at the ion trap to minimize this coupling. With real-time corrections, the stray electric fields are nulled to (0 ± 10) V/m, allowing an estimate of the time-dilation shift and uncertainty (19). The clock shift depends quadratically on the uncompensated electric field, and in the extreme case of a 10-V/m field along both radial directions, the fractional frequency shift is –3.2 × 10–17. We estimate the shift caused by such residual electric fields to be (–2±2) × 10–17 when the clock is operating.

Secular mode heating (20, 21) causes deviations in the secular kinetic energy from the Doppler-cooling limit. We apply 313-nm 9Be+ Doppler-cooling light continuously during each 100-ms clock-transition interrogation, to keep the 27Al+/9Be+ ion pair as cold as possible. However, two poorly damped normal modes of motion heat the ion above the Doppler-cooling limit during this time (12), which leads to a second-order Doppler shift of (–1.6 ± 0.8) × 10–17. Other important shifts are the blackbody radiation shift, which is very small in 27Al+ (10), and the DC quadratic Zeeman shift, which has been accurately calibrated by varying the magnetic field and measuring the shift in the 27Al+/199Hg+ frequency ratio together with the linear Zeeman splitting ν1 between the (1S0 F = 5/2, mF = ±5/2) ↔ (3P0 F = 5/2, mF = ±5/2) lines. The resulting shift is ν2 = –ν12 ×1.0479(7) ×10–8 Hz–1 = –7.1988(48) × 107 Hz/T2.

The 199Hg+ ion standard is based on the (2S1/2 F= 0) → (2D5/2 F = 2, mF = 0) electric-quadrupole transition (22). A 194-nm laser cools the ion to the Doppler-cooling limit via the allowed 2S1/22P1/2 transition, and a fiber clock laser frequency-quadrupled to 282 nm excites the clock transition. The clock state of the 199Hg+ ion is measured directly via quantum jumps in the scattering fluorescence rate of the 194-nm laser (2). Systematic uncertainties in the 199Hg+ standard are listed in Table 1 and have been described previously (22, 23). The dominant uncertainties are due to the quadratic Zeeman effect and the electric quadrupole shift. The AC quadratic Zeeman uncertainty stems from possible unbalanced RF currents in the ion trap. The magnitude of this shift is conservatively estimated by assuming a worst-case asymmetry of 50% in the RF currents that flow in the nominally symmetric ion trap. Such an asymmetry would produce an RMS field of ∼7.3 × 10–7 T at the ion (12), causing a fractional frequency shift of –1.0 × 10–17. We use this value as an upper bound for the magnitude of the shift. The electric-quadrupole shift, which has previously limited the accuracy of the 199Hg+ standard, is constrained below 10–17 by averaging over three orthogonal magnetic field directions (23, 24).

Second-order Doppler shifts for 199Hg+ are easier to control than for 27Al+, because the heavy mercury ion moves less in response to ambient electric fields than the lighter aluminum ion does. Near the Doppler-cooling limit, the total time-dilation shift due to secular motion is (–3±3) ×10–18. Micromotion is carefully compensated (19), leading to a shift of (–4±4)×10–18. Thermal blackbody radiation has a negligible effect on the 199Hg+ ion, which operates in a cryogenic environment of 4 K (23). The quadratic Zeeman coefficient in 199Hg+ was calibrated in a way analogous to that of the 27Al+ standard. Here the shift is ν2 = –ν 21 × 4.9465(29) × 10–11 Hz–1 ≈–1.89 × 1010 Hz /T 2, where ν1 is the linear Zeeman splitting between the (2S1/2 F = 0) → (2D5/2 F= 2, mF = ±1) lines.

First-order Doppler shifts from photon-recoil are suppressed in tightly bound atomic particles (25), due to the Mössbauer effect, where each photon-absorption event lasts for many motional-oscillation cycles. Trapped ions (1, 2) and neutral atoms in optical lattices (26) benefit from this effect, but first-order Doppler shifts may still occur, if the trap itself moves in a correlated fashion with the clock laser pulses. Possible causes for such a shift in ion traps might be stray charge buildup from photo-electrons, which are correlated with the interrogation pulses, or more generally, correlated mechanical motion caused by thermal transients or optical shutters. A correlated velocity of only 10–8 m/s would cause a first-order Doppler shift error of 3 × 10–17. Both standards were evaluated for first-order Doppler shifts by illuminating the ions with counter-propagating clock-laser beams, allowing such motion to be both detected and averaged away. The probe direction is selected by shifting the opposite laser beam away from the ion's resonance, either spectrally by ±100 kHz, in the case of 27Al+ (several times per second), or spatially by a few beam waists in the 199Hg+ clock (every hour). We have not observed a direction-dependent shift in either standard. However, the ratio reported here contains unequal statistical weights for the two probe directions in the 199Hg+ standard. This leads to an additional uncertainty of 7 × 10–18 (12), which we treat as a systematic uncertainty in the 199Hg+ standard (Table 1).

The 199Hg+ and 27Al+ atomic clocks were operated simultaneously, while the femtosecond combs recorded their frequency ratio every second. Figure 2A shows the Allan deviation (an estimate of the statistical measurement uncertainty versus measurement duration) of a typical ratio measurement. For measurement durations τ greater than 100 s, the deviation is given by 3.9 × 10–15/√τ/s. A departure from this slope at long measurement times, which would indicate fluctuating systematic shifts, has not been observed. We expect that both clocks contribute uncorrelated noise of approximately equal magnitude to the statistical measurement uncertainty and derive a long-term stability of 2.8 × 10–15/√τ/s for each clock.

Fig. 2.

(A) Allan deviation of a frequency comparison measurement (11,000 s total). The dashed line represents a 1/√τ slope, beginning at 3.9 × 10–15 for 1 s. (B) History of frequency ratio measurements of the 199Hg+ and 27Al+ frequency standards. Error bars are statistical. Only the last four points are used in the ratio reported here (Fig. 3).

Figures 2B and 3A show the history of measurements of the νAl+Hg+ ratio. Although the first-order Doppler evaluation discussed in the previous paragraph was carried out fully only for the last four data points of Fig. 2B (which, when combined, give the last point of Fig. 3A), the consistency of the earlier measurements provides confidence in the reproducibility of this result. These four points result in a weighted mean of νAl+Hg+ = 1.052871833148990438(55), where the statistical uncertainty of 4.3 × 10–17, the 27Al+ systematic uncertainty of 2.3 × 10–17, and the 199Hg+ systematic uncertainty of 1.9 × 10–17 have been added in quadrature, to yield a fractional ratio uncertainty of 5.2 × 10–17. This ratio may be multiplied by the 199Hg+ absolute frequency, which was calibrated by the NIST-F1 primary cesium standard (27), to yield a frequency of 1121015393207857.4(7) Hz for the 27Al+ standard.

Fig. 3.

(A) History of frequency ratio measurements grouped by month. The line connects the first point to the last one with a slope of (–5.3 ± 7.9) × 10–17/year. Lightly shaded points represent measurements where various systematic shifts were not verified to be at the level stated in Table 1 at the time of the measurements. In the first point, the first-order Doppler shift was not monitored, but all other shifts were well controlled. We do not expect this point to have an error due to this effect, because neither apparatus has ever shown a first-order Doppler shift. For the last point, all shifts listed in Table 1 were well controlled. Error bars are a combination of the statistical measurement uncertainty, and the systematic uncertainties listed in Table 1. (B) Preliminary constraint on temporal variation of fine-structure constant α from this measurement (vertical bar). The horizontal axis corresponds to variation of the fine-structure constant, and the vertical axis corresponds to variation of the cesium nuclear magnetic moment μ = μCsB in units of the Bohr magneton μB, which is notconstrained by this measurement. Also shown are laboratory constraints due to 199Hg+ versus Cs (33) and 171Yb+ versus Cs (34) measurements. The striped ellipse represents the standard uncertainty for the temporal variation of α and μ due to these previous comparisons of atomic clocks, and the smaller white ellipse shows the reduced uncertainty when the present result is combined with the earlier data. This ellipse constrains Embedded Image.

Previous tests for possible counting errors or systematic offsets in the optical frequency combs have shown that the techniques used here support fractional uncertainties on the order of 10–19 (28, 29). Further details are provided in the supporting online materials (12). As an additional check, for many of the measurements of Fig. 2B, an independent Er:fiber-based comb (15) measured νAlHg simultaneously with the Ti:sapphire femtosecond comb (14). During the last four measurements of Fig. 2B, these measurements show agreement at the level of 1.3 × 10–17, which is consistent with the nonoverlapping dead-time fractions of 3% and 5% in the frequency counters used by the two independent femtosecond combs. This dead-time error is already included in the statistical measurement uncertainty of 4.3 × 10–17.

The last entry in Table 1, the gravitational red-shift uncertainty of the 27Al+ clock with respect to the 199Hg+ clock, is only 10–18, because the two standards are in adjacent laboratories, and their height difference was easily measured with 1-cm uncertainty. This uncertainty is typically much larger for greater separations and, for example, contributes 3 × 10–17 uncertainty for intercontinental primary-standard comparisons between Boulder, Colorado, USA, and other locations (30). In the future, high-accuracy portable optical clocks may be available, which could be used to map the height of the geoid with an accuracy beyond that achievable from satellite-based geodesy. Such an endeavor would also require an improved frequency-transfer link between a stationary reference clock and the distant portable standard.

Besides their application to frequency metrology and precision time-keeping, accurate atomic clocks can also help address a fundamental question in physics: Are the constants of nature really constant, or do they change in time or depend on the gravitational potential in which they are measured? Frequency ratio measurements of dissimilar atomic clocks can help answer these questions, because these ratios depend on the fine-structure constant α. From the sequence of measurements in Fig. 3A, one may extract a linear rate of change in the frequency ratio of (–5.3 ± 7.9) × 10–17/year. A fractional change in α of δ leads to a fractional shift of –3.19δ in the energy of the 199 Hg+ clock transition when it is expressed in units of the Rydberg energy (31). For 27Al+, the fractional shift is 0.008δ (32). Thus, the measured linear slope in the frequency ratio corresponds to Embedded Image, consistent with no change (Fig. 3B). However, due to the absence of first-order Doppler shift tests in the first point (Fig. 3 legend), this result must be considered preliminary.

The uncertainties in the atomic clocks reported here occur at the exciting intersection of relativity, geodesy, and quantum physics, and the total uncertainty of 5.2 × 10–17 shows unprecedented sensitivity to gravitational effects and cosmological fluctuations. Future improvements in these atomic clocks will provide even more sensitive probes of nature.

Supporting Online Material

www.sciencemag.org.cgi/content/full/1154622/DC1

SOM Text

Figs. S1 and S2

References

References and Notes

View Abstract

Stay Connected to Science

Navigate This Article