Coupled Superconducting and Magnetic Order in CeCoIn5

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  19 Sep 2008:
Vol. 321, Issue 5896, pp. 1652-1654
DOI: 10.1126/science.1161818


Strong magnetic fluctuations can provide a coupling mechanism for electrons that leads to unconventional superconductivity. Magnetic order and superconductivity have been found to coexist in a number of magnetically mediated superconductors, but these order parameters generally compete. We report that close to the upper critical field, CeCoIn5 adopts a multicomponent ground state that simultaneously carries cooperating magnetic and superconducting orders. Suppressing superconductivity in a first-order transition at the upper critical field leads to the simultaneous collapse of the magnetic order, showing that superconductivity is necessary for the magnetic order. A symmetry analysis of the coupling between the magnetic order and the superconducting gap function suggests a form of superconductivity that is associated with a nonvanishing momentum.

CeCoIn5 is a clean ambient-pressure d-wave superconductor (1) and crystallizes in a tetragonal structure (Fig. 1). Because of its proximity to a magnetic quantum critical point, it features strong antiferromagnetic correlations that result in an enhancement of the effective electronic mass and heavy-fermion behavior (2). However, CeCoIn5 undergoes a transition to superconductivity before magnetic order can be established (2, 3). The superconducting gap function has probably a dx2-y2 symmetry (47), and it is generally believed that superconductivity in CeCoIn5 is mediated by magnetic fluctuations. The Fermi surface is strongly two-dimensional (8, 9), and superconductivity in an applied field is Pauli-limited (10), that is, it is destroyed by a coupling of external magnetic fields to the spins of the Cooper pairs and not by orbital depairing. CeCoIn5 features an unusual field-temperature (H-T) phase diagram (11, 12): below T0 = 0.31 Tc = 1.1 K (Tc, critical temperature), the transition from the normal to the superconducting state is first-order (10, 11). Further, there is evidence for a second superconducting phase, the “Q phase,” which exists only when T < 0.3 K and with high fields close to the upper critical field (11, 13, 14). It has been suggested (11, 15) that this high-field phase may represent a superconducting phase that was proposed by Fulde, Ferrell, Larkin, and Ovchinnikov (FFLO) and that carries a finite momentum as a result of the Zeeman splitting of the electron bands (16, 17).

Fig. 1.

H-T phase diagram of CeCoIn5 with the magnetically ordered phase indicated by the red shaded area. The blue and open circles indicate a first- and second-order transition measured by specific heat (11), respectively, separating the superconducting from the normal phase. The green circles indicate a second-order phase transition inside the superconducting phase (11), and the red circles indicate the onset of magnetic order as measured in our experiment, showing that the magnetic order only exists in the Q phase. (Inset) Magnetic structure of CeCoIn5 at T = 60 mK and H = 11T. The red arrows show the direction of the static magnetic moments located on Ce3+, and the yellow and blue circles indicate the position of the In and Co ions. The depicted structure does not include a possible uniform magnetization along the magnetic field direction. The solid red line indicates the amplitude of the Ce3+ magnetic moment along the c axis, projected on the (h, h, l) plane.

A rich interplay between magnetic order and superconductivity is characteristic of heavy-fermion superconductors, with either magnetic order preceding the onset of superconductivity or superconductivity occurring in the vicinity of a quantum critical point (18, 19). Superconductivity in CeCoIn5 is special in that it occurs close to a magnetic quantum critical point, but so far there has been no direct evidence of long-range magnetic order anywhere in the H-T phase diagram (2). However, there is microscopic evidence from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements for field-induced magnetism for high fields ( = 11 T) in the tetragonal plane and for temperatures below which the Hc2(T) phase boundary becomes first-order (Hc2, upper critical field) (20). The NMR results were interpreted as evidence that the Q phase is a phase in which superconductivity and magnetic order coexist, but the character of the superconducting state could not be ascertained.

We used high-field neutron diffraction to directly search for magnetic Bragg peaks within the Q phase. The measurements were done at low temperatures and the field was applied along the crystallographic [1–1 0] direction in the tetragonal basal plane. For this field direction, the upper critical field in the zero-temperature limit is Hc2(0) = 11.4 T. The neutron diffraction data for wave-vectors along the (h, h, 0.5) reciprocal direction is shown in Fig. 2. Here, h represents the wave-vector transfer along either the [100] or the [010] direction in reciprocal lattice units (r.l.u.). When 10.5 T < H < 11.4 T, neutron scattering provides clear evidence of Bragg peaks that arise from a magnetic structure that is modulated with the ordering wave-vector Q =(q, q, 0.5) (21) and that are present at neither higher nor lower fields outside of the Q phase (hence its name). Here, q represents the wave-vector for which the magnetic Bragg peak has most intensity and indicates the modulation of the magnetic structure along the a and b axes. The width of the peaks is resolution-limited, so the magnetic order extends over a length scale ξ > 60 nm. This is much larger than the diameter of vortex cores, which is of the order of the coherence length ξ0 ∼10 nm (5), and so magnetic order is not limited to the vortex cores.

Fig. 2.

The solid circles represent the neutron-scattering intensity at T = 60 mK for wave vectors (h, h, 0.5) as a function of h for different fields as observed in the center channel of the position-sensitive detector (psd), showing the presence of a magnetic neutron diffraction peak at (1 – q, 1 – q, 0.5) with q = 0.44 for (A) H = 10.6 T, (B) H = 10.8 T, (C) H = 11 T, and (D) H = 11.3 T. The gray circles in (A) and (B) represent the best estimate of the background, whereas they represent the neutron scattering intensity in (C) at H = 11 T and T = 400 mK and in (D) at H = 11.4 T and T = 60 mK. The solid red lines are fits of a Gaussian function to the magnetic scattering.

The field and temperature dependence of the peak intensity of the Q =(q, q, 0.5) magnetic Bragg peak obtained from a fit to a Gaussian line shape is shown in Fig. 2. The magnetic order at T = 60 mK has a gradual onset with increasing field and collapses at the superconducting phase boundary Hc2 in a first-order transition (Fig. 3A). The intensity of the magnetic Bragg peak can also be suppressed by increasing the temperature (Fig. 3B); the signal disappears at the same temperature at which specific heat measurements show evidence of a second-order phase transition (11). The neutron data suggest a transition that is second-order in temperature but first-order in field. The incommensuration q of the Bragg peak position is not field-dependent, as can be seen in the inset of Fig. 3A. The H-T phase diagram (Fig. 1) shows that magnetic order exists only in the superconducting Q phase and not in the normal phase, which demonstrates that superconductivity is essential for magnetic order. Our results provide evidence that the ground state in this field and temperature range in the vicinity of Hc2(0) has a multicomponent order parameter that directly couples superconductivity and magnetism. This type of order is at least partly due to strong antiferromagnetic fluctuations, arising from the proximity to a magnetic quantum critical point in CeCoIn5.

Fig. 3.

Neutron-scattering intensity at (q, q, 0.5), (A) as a function of field at T = 60 mK and (B) as a function of temperature at H = 11 T. The gray circles represent the background scattering taken from the two nearest to the center channels of the psd. The dashed red line in (A) is a guide to the eye, whereas the dashed line in (B) describes the background and the onset of the magnetic order in a second-order phase transition with β = 0.365 fixed to the critical exponent of the three-dimensional Heisenberg universality class. The inset shows that the q is field-independent.

Our experiment shows that the magnetic structure is a transverse amplitude-modulated incommensurate spin-density wave whose magnetic moments are orientated along the tetragonal c axis, modulated with the incommensurate wave-vector (q, q, 0.5) perpendicular to the magnetic field. Neighboring Ce3+ magnetic moments that are separated by a unit cell lattice translation along the c axis are antiparallel (Fig. 1). The amplitude of the magnetic moment (m) at T = 60 mK and H = 11 T of m = 0.15(5) Bohr magnetons (μB) is considerably smaller than expected for the Ce3+ free ion, possibly due to the Kondo effect. The direction of the ordered magnetic moment is consistent with magnetic susceptibility measurements (1) that identify the c axis as the easy axis, and it is also consistent with zero-field inelastic neutron measurements in which strong antiferromagnetic fluctuations have been observed that are polarized along the c axis (22).

The magnetic structure that satisfies NMR data (20) was described by an ordering wave-vector Q =(q, 0.5, 0.5) with unspecified q and the ordered magnetic moment along the applied field that was along the [100] direction. Our neutron measurements of field along the [1–10] direction reveal a magnetic order for which both the ordering wave-vector Q =(q, q, 0.5) and the ordered moments are perpendicular to the applied magnetic field, in contrast to the NMR data. This difference suggests that the direction of the incommensurate modulation Q depends on the field direction, and that the order wave vector can be tuned with a rotation of the magnetic field in the basal plane. Finally, the absence of magnetic Bragg peaks at H = 11T when T > 0.3 K confirms the interpretation of the NMR measurements (20) that the fluctuations for 0.3 K < T < T0 are short-ranged and possibly only present inside the vortex cores.

The observation that magnetism exists only in the presence of superconductivity is in stark contrast to other materials in which long-range magnetic order and superconductivity merely coexist for a small magnetic field or pressure range because of their different origins (18, 19). Because no magnetic order is observed in CeCoIn5 above the upper critical field Hc2, the relation between magnetic order and superconductivity is fundamentally different and cannot be seen as a competition. Instead, it appears that CeCoIn5 in fields greater than Hc2 gives rise to strong antiferromagnetic fluctuations that condense into magnetic order with decreasing magnetic field only through the opening of an electronic gap and restructuring of the Fermi surface at the superconducting phase boundary. This means that the second-order magnetic quantum phase transition is inaccessible because, in its proximity, there is no energy scale associated with the antiferromagnetic fluctuations, and the superconducting energy gap becomes the dominant energy scale and determines the magnetic ground-state properties.

The intimate link between superconductivity and magnetic order in CeCoIn5 suggests the presence of a specific coupling between these order parameters (23). The multicomponent magnetosuperconducting phase can be reached via two second-order phase transitions through a suitable path in the H-T phase diagram, which justifies the construction of a phenomenological Landau coupling theory. If one assumes that the superconducting gap at zero field Δd has dx2–y2 symmetry, the possible coupling terms for magnetic fields in the basal plane that preserve time-reversal symmetry and conserves momentum can be written as V1 = Δ*d Mq (HxΔ(5)y,–q + HyΔ(5)x,–q) + c.c., V2 = Δ*d Mq (HxDxHyDy) Δ(2)–q + c.c., and V3 = Δ*d Mq (HxDy –HyDx) Δ(3) –q + c.c. Here, (Δ(5) x,–q, Δ(5)y,–q) belongs to the two-component even-parity Γ+5 state, Δ(2) –q and Δ(3) –q are the Γ-2 and Γ-3 odd-parity states (24), c.c. stands for the complex conjugate of the preceding term, and Mq is the magnetic-order parameter. These additional superconducting order parameters include a finite momentum –q. (Dx, Dy) is the gauge invariant gradient. Introducing the magnetic field allows one to couple Mq in linear order to preserve time-reversal symmetry. These combinations allow for a second-order phase transition within the superconducting phase and a first-order transition to the nonmagnetic normal state. For the coupling term V2, no magnetic structure is induced for fields H ∥ [100]. Given the weak dependence of the Q phase on the magnetic field orientation in the basal plane, our measurements suggest the presence of a V1 or V3 coupling term, inducing the finite-momentum even-parity Γ+5 state or the odd-parity Γ-3 state.

This Landau theory shows that incommensurate magnetic order induces a superconducting gap function that carries a finite momentum—the first experimental evidence of a superconducting condensate that carries a momentum. However, we show that this state may not arise purely from Pauli paramagnetic effects and the formation of a new pairing state between exchange-split parts of the Fermi surface, a state commonly known as the FFLO state (16, 17). In the FFLO state, the pairing state carries a momentum of the Cooper pair that depends on the magnetic field via |q| = 2μBH/ħvF, where vF is the Fermi velocity. However, the inset of Fig. 3A shows that |q| is field-independent in CeCoIn5, at odds with this prediction, which indicates that an additional superconducting pairing channel with finite momentum is induced in conjunction with the cooperative appearance of magnetic order.

A superconducting order that carries momentum illustrates the wealth of quantum phases that can exist in solid matter. The important microscopic role of magnetic fluctuations in the formation of Cooper pairs in CeCoIn5 is self-evident because superconductivity emerges at Hc2(0) simultaneously with ordered magnetism.

Supporting Online Material

Materials and Methods


References and Notes

View Abstract

Navigate This Article