Report

# Apoptotic Force and Tissue Dynamics During Drosophila Embryogenesis

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  19 Sep 2008:
Vol. 321, Issue 5896, pp. 1683-1686
DOI: 10.1126/science.1157052

## Abstract

Understanding cell morphogenesis during metazoan development requires knowledge of how cells and the extracellular matrix produce and respond to forces. We investigated how apoptosis, which remodels tissue by eliminating supernumerary cells, also contributes forces to a tissue (the amnioserosa) that promotes cell-sheet fusion (dorsal closure) in the Drosophila embryo. We showed that expression in the amnioserosa of proteins that suppress or enhance apoptosis slows or speeds dorsal closure, respectively. These changes correlate with the forces produced by the amnioserosa and the rate of seam formation between the cell sheets (zipping), key processes that contribute to closure. This apoptotic force is used by the embryo to drive cell-sheet movements during development, a role not classically attributed to apoptosis.

Morphogenesis is a biomechanical process whereby individual cells and cohorts of cells produce and respond to forces to generate the complex form of a developing multicellular organism (1). Dorsal closure during Drosophila embryogenesis (Fig. 1, A to C, fig. S1, and movie S1) is an example of a robust morphogenetic process that also is a model system for biological and biophysical investigations of epidermal fusion and wound healing (26). During dorsal closure, two lateral epithelial cell sheets advance to progressively cover an eye-shaped opening that is transiently occupied by the amnioserosa, an extraembryonic tissue. The dorsal-most row of cells in each epithelial sheet constitutes a distinct tissue, known as the leading edge of the lateral epidermis, which contains an actomyosin-rich cable or supracellular “purse string.” As closure progresses, the leading edges approach each other and form seams at each canthus in a process known as zipping (7), in which a canthus is the structure at the anterior- and posterior-most ends of the dorsal opening. Dorsal closure is the consequence of synchronized cellular forces and processes. Active forces are generated by nonmuscle myosin II in each purse string and in the amnioserosa (8), and by a resistive force in the lateral epidermis (2, 4). Synchronization is a consequence of an emergent property that correlates the rate of closure with zipping (5, 6).

Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, has been extensively investigated [reviewed in (9)] and is an integral part of dorsal closure (10) and other developmental processes. Of particular relevance is the stereotypic sequence of events that characterizes apoptotic cells in epithelia, where delamination and apoptosis must be precisely coordinated so that dying cells are removed without compromising either the transepithelial or planar integrity of the tissue. In Madin-Darby canine kidney cell monolayers, an actomyosin ring forms within the apoptotic cell and a supracellular actomyosin purse string forms in the neighboring cells that surround this apoptotic cell (11). Contraction of these purse strings is reported to drive cell extrusion. In Drosophila, apoptosis occurs during stages 11 to 16 of embryogenesis [(12) and supporting online material (SOM) text]. After dorsal closure, the components of the amnioserosa cells are recycled through apoptosis (10). In addition, Kiehart et al. (2) observed that 13 out of 110 amnioserosa cells constricted their apical surfaces and dropped out of the epithelial plane and into the interior of the embryo during dorsal closure, suggesting the possibility of apoptosis. Here we show that apoptosis provides one-third to one-half of the net force that drives closure. This feature is in addition to the known roles of apoptosis, such as in eliminating supernumerary cells and maintaining homeostasis.

Through-focus (Z-stack) confocal images of dorsal closure in wild-type embryos that express the F-actin reporter [green fluorescent protein (GFP) fused to the actin-binding domain of moesin (GFP-moe) (2)] indicate that a subset of amnioserosa cells exhibits the hallmarks of apoptosis (Fig. 2). These include the constriction of their apical surfaces, their extrusion inward from the amnioserosa cell sheet, subsequent blebbing, and cell fragmentation. Five to seven cells that neighbor each apoptotic cell are distorted as part of this process (upper right-hand frame of Fig. 2A), thereby taking on a rosette geometry (13, 14). These neighboring cells elongate toward the apoptotic cell to maintain a continuous dorsal surface as the apoptotic cell is extruded; contraction of both the apoptotic cell and the apoptotic supracellular purse string in the neighboring cells (11) may contribute to these cell shape changes, by which the surface area of these nearest-neighbor cells decreased by 27.3 ± 8.6% (N = 52 cells) relative to a 14.2 ± 4.4% (N = 58 cells) reduction in control amnioserosa cells (P < 0.05, SOM text). Figure 2B also indicates that the next–to–nearest-neighbor cells are distorted and are pulled toward the apoptotic cell. These observations demonstrate that the vast majority of the amnioserosa cells are directly influenced by the apoptotic process and exceed by a factor of 5 to 7 the number that actively undergo apoptosis before the completion of closure. This raises the possibility that the apoptotic process contributes to the force that favors closure. To test this hypothesis, we used the bipartite GAL4-UAS system, which allows tissue-specific and temporally specific gene expression (15), to inhibit or induce (enhance) apoptosis in the amnioserosa and then investigated the effects on the kinematics and dynamics of closure.

We inhibited the apoptotic process in amnioserosa cells only, by using a strong driver (c381-GAL4) to express an anti-apoptotic caspase suppressor (p35) responder [(16), hereafter referred to as AS-p35]. We induced (enhanced) apoptosis only in amnioserosa cells, by using a weaker driver, c825-GAL4 (17), to express a proapoptotic (grim) responder [(18), hereafter referred to as AS-grim]. These embryos also express GFP-moe to provide contrast for in vivo confocal microscopy. Complete genotypes and our choice of drivers are accounted for in (19). None of amnioserosa cells in AS-p35 embryos exhibited the hallmarks of apoptosis (movie S2), and the number of apoptotic cells increased in AS-grim embryos relative to controls. We measured the occurrence of apoptosis in amnioserosa cells and defined the rate of apoptosis, Rapoptosis = n/τ, where n is the number of amnioserosa cells exhibiting the hallmarks of apoptosis observed during a time τ (SOM text). Rapoptosis was increased from 5.5 ± 2.1 × 10–3 s–1 (N = 6 embryos) in controls (19) to 16.3 ± 2.9 × 10–3 s–1 (N = 6 embryos) in AS-grim embryos, and no apoptosis (0.0 ± 0.0 × 10–3 s–1, N = 6 embryos) was observed in AS-p35 embryos (Fig. 1D).

We observed three significant kinematic and dynamic consequences when apoptosis was either inhibited or induced. First, we quantified the rate of closure vnative = dh/dt by measuring h as a function of time t, where h is the maximum distance from a purse string to the dorsal midline (fig. S2). vnative is the result of the net force exerted by the amnioserosa, lateral epidermis, and purse string on a leading-edge cell (4, 5). vnative is reduced from 6.3 ± 0.6 nm/s (N = 5 embryos) in controls to 3.6 ± 1.1 nm/s (N = 6 embryos) in AS-p35 embryos and increased to 10.2 ± 0.8 nm/s (N = 6 embryos) in AS-grim embryos. Plots of H, the height from purse string to purse string at the maximum opening (fig. S2), versus t are well approximated as linear in all cases (Fig. 1, A to C, and E; and movies S3 to S5).

Second, mechanical jump experiments (4, 5) were used to quantify changes in σAS, the force per unit of length produced by the amnioserosa on the leading edge under experimental conditions that either inhibit or induce apoptosis in the amnioserosa. A laser microbeam was used to rapidly dissect the amnioserosa away from one of the leading edges (the edge-cut protocol) [Fig. 3A and movie S6 (19)]. With the release of σAS, the leading edge recoils away from the dorsal midline to a turning point and closure eventually resumes. The initial recoil velocity, vrecoil, is directly proportional to σAS (SOM text). Taking the ratio of the measured vrecoil_AS-p35 (or vrecoil_AS-grim) to vrecoil_GAL4 control yields the ratios $Math$(1) $Math$ where the GAL4 control genotype represents several distinct genotypes (19). vrecoil was 2373 ± 60 nm/s in controls (N = 7 embryos), 1727 ± 287 nm/s in AS-p35 embryos (N = 5 embryos, P < 0.05), and 3141 ± 246 nm/s in AS-grim embryos (N = 6 embryos, P < 0.05). Thus, in apoptosis-suppressed AS-p35 embryos, σAS is reduced by 29 ± 9%, whereas in apoptosis-enhanced AS-grim embryos, σAS is increased by 32 ± 7%, relative to controls. This indicates that about one-third of the force produced by the amnioserosa in wild-type embryos is attributable to apoptosis.

Third, we quantified changes in zipping due to inhibiting or inducing apoptosis by evaluating the change in the seam lengths wA(t) and wP(t) at the anterior (A) and posterior (P) canthi, respectively (fig. S2). Figure 4A plots the length wA(t) + wP(t). Zipping is slower in AS-p35 embryos and faster in AS-grim embryos, relative to controls. Previously, we showed that [SOM text (5)] $Math$(2) $Math$ where kz,A and kz,P are the zipping rate constants; θA,R, θA,L, θP,R, and θP,L are angles defined by the dorsal midline and the segments of the purse strings that meet at each canthus; and R and L refer to the right and left sides of the essentially bilaterally symmetric embryo (fig. S2). Figure 4B and table S1 compare kz,A and kz,P. At the anterior canthus, kz,A decreased by 40 ± 23% when apoptosis was inhibited. In contrast, at the posterior canthus, kz,P increased by 73 ± 34% when apoptosis was increased. Additionally inhibition of apoptosis decreased kz,A to kz,P, and enhancement of apoptosis increased kz,P to kz,A.

To investigate why changes in apoptosis might influence the zipping rate at each canthus, we quantified the distribution of Rapoptosis in control, AS-p35, and AS-grim embryos (Fig. 4C). In controls, apoptosis occurs about five times more frequently in the anterior and middle thirds of the dorsal opening, relative to the posterior third. In AS-p35 embryos, there is a uniform absence of apoptosis throughout the dorsal opening. In AS-grim embryos, the occurrence of apoptosis is enhanced and distributed uniformly throughout the dorsal opening. Taken together, these observations indicate that the symmetry properties in the rate of apoptosis correlate with those of zipping (table S2).

Given these three kinematic and dynamic consequences, we considered next the correlations between normalized plots of vnative (Fig. 1F), σAS (Fig. 3B), and kz (Fig. 4D) versus Rapoptosis (SOM text). These figures demonstrate that vnative, σAS, and kz are each strongly correlated with Rapoptosis and are mutually correlated.

We conclude that during dorsal closure, delamination of the apoptosing amnioserosa cells produces forces that both facilitate cell extrusion and promote closure. This apoptotic force significantly contributes to σAS, and thus the dynamics of closure changed when the rate of apoptosis was altered. Our observations suggest directions for future research. It is well known that the disruption of cell-matrix interactions induces apoptosis in epithelial cells (20). Thus, we hypothesize that tension and apoptosis may contribute to a positive feedback mechanism that serves as a force regulator or rheostat.

Our results raise the possibility of a dynamic role for apoptosis in other morphogenic processes. Indeed, an apoptotic force has been proposed as part of the epithelial strand-pull theory in hair follicles (21). Although not all apoptotic processes are related to force generation, we anticipate that apoptotic forces may be important for epithelial fusion in processes such as the development of the adult abdomen of Drosophila (22). Moreover, we cannot rule out the possibility that apoptotic forces contribute to the tissue-sculpting processes that drive processes such as digit individualization and joint formation. An apoptotic force may also play a beneficial role during wound healing (11, 23) as a source of mechanical tension that promotes tissue reconstruction. We propose that evolution efficiently uses all possible sources of forces for morphogenesis, and that apoptosis in the amnioserosa is one such force that is co-opted to help drive dorsal closure.

Supporting Online Material

Materials and Methods

SOM Text

Figs. S1 to S4

Tables S1 and S2

Movies S1 to S6

References

View Abstract