News FocusPhysics

Is Quantum Mechanics Tried, True, Wildly Successful, and Wrong?

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  19 Jun 2009:
Vol. 324, Issue 5934, pp. 1512-1513
DOI: 10.1126/science.324_1512

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed.  Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

  • 2 Nobel Physics Prize winners (Louis de Broglie and Brian Schmidt) are teaching me things

    Simultaneously with an astrophysics course from Australian National University (presented by Dr. Paul Francis and Brian Schmidt, the cowinner of the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics), I'm doing a robotics course with the Queensland University of Technology. I made a comment on the robotics website about bandgap implants in the brain allowing us to add and delete "wavelengths of matter" in the future. The following day, I re-wrote this to become an eLetter responding to an article on the website of "Science", the journal of the AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science).

    While rewriting my comment, I was reminded of physicist Louis de Broglie and his equation from last century relating the wavelength of a particle to its mass (expressing wave-particle duality). Part of this is the square root of (1 - v^2/c^2) which is also used in the ANU video's beaming, or concentrating in a particular direction. de Broglie's relation of wavelength and mass may be viewed in terms of the vector-tensor-scalar geometry discussed in some of my previous posts on the website of ANU's course.

    One side of a parallelogram can represent the vector of a photon, while the adjacent side is the vector of the presently hypothetical graviton. These are beamed or concentrated in the particular direction of the parallelogram's diagonal (tensor calculus can likewise convert the coordinates of the sides/vectors into the coordinates of a...

    Show More
    Competing Interests: None declared.

Stay Connected to Science