You are currently viewing the summary.
View Full TextLog in to view the full text
AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.
More options
Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.
Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.
This article has a correction. Please see:
Summary
As the number of hominin fossil discoveries has exploded in recent years, researchers and paleoartists alike have been working overtime to refine their visions of what our ancestors looked like. In the past, because of gaps in the fossil record, paleoartists tended to represent early humans as half-chimp and half-human. But recent finds, including candidate hominins dated to 5 million to 7 million years ago, have spurred demand by museum directors and magazine editors for increasingly lifelike, three-dimensional hominin recreations. The interplay between art and science makes reconstruction a two-way street. Some researchers argue that reconstructions influence how scientists view ancient hominins and interpret their behavior. Yet the comfort level about reconstructions varies among scientists.
