Report

A Dimeric Structure for Archaeal Box C/D Small Ribonucleoproteins

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  11 Sep 2009:
Vol. 325, Issue 5946, pp. 1384-1387
DOI: 10.1126/science.1176099

Abstract

Methylation of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) is required for optimal protein synthesis. Multiple 2′-O-ribose methylations are carried out by box C/D guide ribonucleoproteins [small ribonucleoproteins (sRNPs) and small nucleolar ribonucleoproteins (snoRNPs)], which are conserved from archaea to eukaryotes. Methylation is dictated by base pairing between the specific guide RNA component of the sRNP or snoRNP and the target rRNA. We determined the structure of a reconstituted and catalytically active box C/D sRNP from the archaeon Methanocaldococcus jannaschii by single-particle electron microscopy. We found that archaeal box C/D sRNPs unexpectedly formed a dimeric structure with an alternative organization of their RNA and protein components that challenges the conventional view of their architecture. Mutational analysis demonstrated that this di-sRNP structure was relevant for the enzymatic function of archaeal box C/D sRNPs.

In all three kingdoms of life, nucleotides in ribosomal RNA (rRNA) are posttranscriptionally modified. The nucleotide modifications cluster in phylogenetically conserved regions and are important for ribosome structure, stability, and function (1). One of the most common nucleotide modifications is 2′-O-methylation of ribose residues, which is performed by box C/D small ribonucleoproteins (sRNPs) in archaea and small nucleolar ribonucleoproteins (snoRNPs) in eukaryotes, respectively. Modifications are guided by base pairing of the RNA component of sRNPs and snoRNPs with their target rRNAs (2, 3). Understanding the mechanism of action of these sRNPs and snoRNPs requires knowledge of their organization and architecture.

The RNA component of box C/D sRNPs and snoRNPs is characterized by conserved box C, C′, D, and D′ sequence elements, which are bound by core box C/D proteins (Fig. 1A) [reviewed in (4)]. In archaea, the core proteins include L7Ae, Nop5 (also called Nop56/58), and the methyltransferase enzyme fibrillarin, which all have mammalian homologs. Whereas the core proteins are common to all box C/D sRNPs and snoRNPs, the sRNAs and snoRNAs differ in sequence, especially in the D and D′ guide regions that form base pairs with specific sites in target RNAs (2, 3, 5, 6).

Fig. 1

Assembly, purification, and enzymatic activity of the reconstituted M. jannaschii (Mj) box C/D sRNP. (A) Schematic of an archaeal box C/D sRNA. The conserved sequence motifs, boxes C and C′ (yellow) and boxes D and D′ (blue), as well as the guide sequences are indicated. Each box C/D and box C′/D′ motif is bound by the core box C/D proteins L7Ae, Nop5, and fibrillarin. (B) Purification of reconstituted sRNP by glycerol gradient centrifugation. Proteins and RNA of unpurified sRNP (input) and harvested fractions were analyzed by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and silver staining (top) and by Northern blotting (bottom), respectively. Arrowheads below the gel indicate peaks of protein markers of corresponding S values. (C) Sedimentation of box C/D sRNP protein components in the absence of the box C/D sRNA. (D) Sedimentation of the human U1 snRNP (240 kD) in glycerol gradients. (E) Methylation activity of the M. jannaschii box C/D sRNP in the unpurified material (input) and in the gradient fractions using substrate RNAs complementary to the D guide (black bars) and D′ guide (gray bars) sequences of the sRNA, respectively. As a control for nonspecific methylation activity, premethylated RNAs were used as substrates (asterisks).

In contrast to their eukaryotic counterparts, enzymatically active archaeal box C/D sRNPs can be reconstituted in vitro (7). For efficient 2′-O-ribose methylation, each of the box C/D and box C′/D′ motifs in one sRNA are required to assemble symmetrically with all three core proteins into an RNP that is conventionally illustrated as containing one sRNA and two copies of each of the three core proteins (Fig. 1A) (8, 9). However, no structure of enzymatically active box C/D sRNPs containing the full-length sRNA exists.

To determine the three-dimensional (3D) structure of a reconstituted and catalytically competent methylation guide sRNP from the hyperthermophilic euryarchaeon Methanocaldococcus jannaschii, we used electron microscopy (EM) and single-particle analysis. We reconstituted box C/D sRNPs in vitro using recombinant M. jannaschii core proteins and in vitro transcribed M. jannaschii sR8 sRNA and subsequently purified the assembled RNP on glycerol gradients. All sRNP components comigrated in peak gradient fractions 10 and 11 (Fig. 1B). Consistent with previous results (9), assembly required the presence of the sRNA (Fig. 1C).

The purified sRNP was catalytically active for methylation of RNA substrates using either guide sequence in the sR8 sRNA, and methylation was specific to the fifth nucleotide upstream of boxes D and D′ (Fig. 1E). Comparison of the reconstituted sRNP to molecular mass markers of indicated S values (Fig. 1B) as well as to the human U1 snRNP (240 kD; Fig. 1D) showed that the catalytically active box C/D sRNP migrated at 12 S, faster than the human U1 snRNP. In contrast, the heterotetrameric complex formed by Nop5 and fibrillarin (136 kD) (8, 10, 11) migrated at ~6.5 S in glycerol gradients (Fig. 1C and fig. S1). These results indicate that the box C/D sRNP is a much larger complex than what would be expected on the basis of the conventional model of box C/D sRNP architecture (183 kD predicted). Analysis of complexes by gel filtration chromatography supported these conclusions (fig. S2, A to C). Furthermore, various biochemical experiments (fig. S2) demonstrated that the reconstituted and catalytically active box C/D sRNPs were biochemically homogeneous.

EM analysis of negatively stained complexes from peak gradient fractions showed a monodisperse population of particles (Fig. 2A and fig. S2D). Use of the random conical tilt method (12) enabled a 3D ab initio reconstruction of the box C/D sRNP by single-particle analysis (figs. S3 to S8). The EM structure was refined to a resolution of 27 Å (fig. S6B) (13). The experimental class averages and projections of the refined volume were in good agreement with each other (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2

EM and 3D reconstruction of the archaeal box C/D sRNP. (A) Electron micrograph of negatively stained sRNPs from peak fractions after glycerol gradient centrifugation. (B) Experimental class averages and corresponding 2D projections of the reconstructed 3D volume. Scale bar, 10 nm. (See also figs. S3 and S4.) (C) Isodensity map of the reconstructed 3D volume. (D) Docking of the crystal structures of Pyrococcus furiosus Nop5-fibrillarin [PDB 2nnw (11)] and M. jannaschii L7Ae [1xbi (25)] in the isodensity map. Blue, Nop5; orange, fibrillarin; yellow, L7Ae. The volumes were thresholded to 118% of the molecular mass of the di-sRNP. (E and F) Proposed di-sRNP model (E) contrasted with the conventional model of archaeal box C/D sRNP architecture (F). Colors are as in (D) and the RNA is shown in gray. The orientation of the sRNA ends was purposefully left ambiguous.

The refined sRNP volume measured 14.8 nm by 13 nm by 9 nm and exhibited two-fold pseudosymmetry (Fig. 2C). Consistent with our biochemical analyses (Fig. 1 and figs. S1 and S2), the volume was larger than anticipated on the basis of existing atomic-resolution structures of box C/D core proteins and the conventional box C/D sRNP model (10, 11). Docking of the crystal structures into the EM volume revealed that it could accommodate not one but two Nop5-fibrillarin heterotetramers, placing fibrillarin in the corners of the complex (Fig. 2D). Consistent with a relative 1:1:1 stoichiometry of L7Ae, Nop5, and fibrillarin as determined by quantitative amino acid analysis (13), four L7Ae molecules could be fit into the remaining density, placing L7Ae in proximity to the C-terminal domain of Nop5 (Fig. 2D). Thus, the sRNP EM volume contained four copies of each core protein.

Previous biochemical data (8, 9, 14), together with the presence of four sets of each of the core proteins (L7Ae, Nop5, and fibrillarin) in the sRNP volume, strongly suggest that the box C/D sRNP contains two sRNA molecules. The box C/D and C′/D′ motifs are most likely positioned in the remaining density in proximity to the sRNA binding protein L7Ae (15) and the C-terminal RNA binding domain of Nop5 (10). This topology is consistent with the recent crystal structure of hPrp31 (a Nop5 homolog) complexed with 15.5K (an L7Ae homolog) and a U4 snRNA fragment (fig. S9) (16).

Although the resolution of the EM structure did not allow the sRNA molecules to be unambiguously localized, the distribution of the remaining density in the EM volume not occupied by the core box C/D proteins implies that the two sRNAs connect the two Nop5-fibrillarin heterotetramers along the short sides of the sRNP volume and follow a different directionality than the Nop5 coiled-coil domains. Consistent with this interpretation, ribonuclease treatment of the reconstituted sRNP yielded smaller complexes (14 nm by 6 nm in projection), which were about half the size of untreated sRNPs (fig. S10).

Taken together, these results were not compatible with the conventional model of box C/D sRNP architecture (Fig. 2F) but could be explained by an alternative model: a di-sRNP containing four copies of each core protein and two sRNAs (Fig. 2E).

To verify the di-sRNP model, we analyzed sRNPs lacking both fibrillarin and the N-terminal, fibrillarin-interacting domain of Nop5 (Nop5ΔN/minus fibrillarin). Docking of the crystal structures into the EM volume (Fig. 2D) predicted that these RNP components occupied the density in the four corners of the sRNP volume and that Nop5ΔN/minus fibrillarin sRNPs should lack those four regions of density. Results from both biochemical and EM experiments were consistent with a smaller size of these particles relative to the fully assembled sRNP (Fig. 3, A to C, and figs. S11 and S12). Class averages of the Nop5ΔN/minus fibrillarin sRNP indeed lacked the strong density in the four corners (Fig. 3, D to G). These results provide further evidence that the box C/D sRNP contained four copies of fibrillarin, and likewise four copies of L7Ae and Nop5, and consequently support the di-sRNP model (Fig. 2E).

Fig. 3

Localization of fibrillarin and the N-terminal domain of Nop5 in the EM structure. (A and B) Sedimentation profile of the Nop5ΔN/minus fibrillarin sRNP (A) and L7Ae and Nop5ΔN in the absence of the sRNA (B) analyzed by glycerol gradient centrifugation. (C and D) Electron micrograph (C) and representative class average of negatively stained Nop5ΔN/minus fibrillarin sRNP particles from peak glycerol gradient fractions (D) (see also fig. S11). (E) Class average of the reconstituted box C/D sRNP particles containing fibrillarin and the N terminus of Nop5. (F) Difference map between the class averages of the two different RNPs as shown in (D) and (E). (G) Statistically significant region as calculated with the t test in SPIDER with a P value of P ≤ 0.001. Scale bars, 10 nm [(D) and (E)].

The di-sRNP model predicted a molecular mass of 366 kD for the M. jannaschii box C/D sRNP. This size was consistent with the results obtained both by glycerol gradient centrifugation (Fig. 1B) and by gel filtration chromatography (fig. S2A). Furthermore, the S value calculated from the EM volume was 11.7 S (13), very close to the observed value of 12 S (Fig. 1B). Di-sRNP formation was also apparent with a different EM staining technique, the GraFix method of glycerol gradient centrifugation (17), and with different constructs for protein expression (figs. S13 to S16).

Furthermore, the di-sRNP model predicted that the Nop5 proteins are critical for maintaining this conformation, as they would orchestrate the positioning of the two different sRNAs (Fig. 2, D and E). Previous biochemical experiments showed that some mutations in the coiled-coil domain of Nop5 (Nop5 CC) abrogated methylation activity of the sRNP, whereas others were tolerated (8, 14). We analyzed these Nop5 CC mutant sRNPs and found that both Nop5mut2 and Nop5mut4 sRNPs, which were previously shown to methylate substrate RNAs (14), had sizes and dimensions similar to those of sRNPs containing the wild-type Nop5, whereas Nop5ΔCC sRNPs, which are methylation-deficient (14), were smaller (Fig. 4, A to C, and figs. S17 and S18). Collectively, our results indicate that the formation of the di-sRNP structure correlates with efficient methylation activity of the box C/D sRNP.

Fig. 4

Formation of the box C/D di-sRNP structure correlates with efficient enzymatic activity. (A to C) sRNPs assembled with Nop5 containing point mutations in the coiled-coil domain [mut2 in (A) and mut4 in (B)] or a deletion of the coiled-coil domain [ΔCC in (C)] were analyzed by glycerol gradient centrifugation and complexes in peak fractions were visualized by EM after negative staining. Representative class averages of sRNP particles assembled with Nop5mut2 and Nop5mut4, respectively, are shown. The number of images in each class is indicated in the right upper corner of each class average. The sRNP assembled with Nop5ΔCC was too small for calculation of meaningful class averages.

Our work provides a 3D structure of a catalytically active box C/D sRNP, revealing an unexpected di-sRNP topology. Multimeric RNPs composed of individual RNPs are not unprecedented. Examples include the U4/U6 di-snRNP, the U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP, the U11/U12 di-snRNP, and telomerase (1823). Since the first discovery of a box C/D snoRNA 40 years ago (24), box C/D sRNPs and snoRNPs have been assumed to consist of one sRNA or snoRNA molecule and one or two sets of each core protein. Contrary to this original assumption, the structure of a reconstituted archaeal box C/D sRNP presented here argues that these complexes form a functionally relevant, unanticipated di-sRNP structure with an alternative organization of the RNA and protein components. We do not know whether this structure forms in vivo. If it does, then box C/D di-sRNPs could be composed of two different box C/D sRNAs. If multiple guide sequences are used at the same time, a di-sRNP (or di-snoRNP) architecture may be an efficient means by which these RNP chaperones can participate in folding of the long pre-rRNA.

Supporting Online Material

www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/325/5946/1384/DC1

Materials and Methods

Figs. S1 to S18

References

References and Notes

  1. See supporting material on Science Online.
  2. We thank M. Golas, P. Moore, K. Reinisch, J. Steitz, T. Steitz, H. Wang, and S. Wolin for helpful discussion and/or critical reading of the manuscript, and the Yale University Biomedical High Performance Computing Center (supported by NIH grant RR19895). This work was supported by a Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds Ph.D. scholarship (F.B.), NIH grants R01GM69699 (B.A.B.) and R01GM52581 (S.J.B.), and NSF grant MCB0543741 (E.S.M.). The EM map has been deposited into EMDB (accession code EMD-1636).
View Abstract

Navigate This Article