Histone H3 Thr-3 Phosphorylation by Haspin Positions Aurora B at Centromeres in Mitosis

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  08 Oct 2010:
Vol. 330, Issue 6001, pp. 231-235
DOI: 10.1126/science.1189435


Aurora B is a component of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) required for correct spindle-kinetochore attachments during chromosome segregation and for cytokinesis. The chromatin factors that recruit the CPC to centromeres are unknown, however. Here we show that phosphorylation of histone H3 threonine 3 (H3T3ph) by Haspin is necessary for CPC accumulation at centromeres and that the CPC subunit Survivin binds directly to H3T3ph. A nonbinding Survivin-D70A/D71A mutant does not support centromeric CPC concentration, and both Haspin depletion and Survivin-D70A/D71A mutation diminish centromere localization of the kinesin MCAK and the mitotic checkpoint response to taxol. Survivin-D70A/D71A mutation and microinjection of H3T3ph-specific antibody both compromise centromeric Aurora B functions but do not prevent cytokinesis. Therefore, H3T3ph generated by Haspin positions the CPC at centromeres to regulate selected targets of Aurora B during mitosis.

The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC)—which contains Aurora B, inner centromere protein (INCENP), Survivin, and Borealin—is found on chromosome arms in prophase, concentrates at inner centromeres during prometaphase, and transfers to the central spindle at anaphase (1). Aurora B phosphorylates several substrates at these locations, including histone H3 Ser10 (H3S10ph) on chromosome arms, mitotic centromere-associated kinesin (MCAK) at inner centromeres, centromere protein–A Ser7 (CENP-AS7ph) at outer centromeres, and the KNL1/Mis12 complex/Ndc80 network at kinetochores (17). Current models suggest that centromeric Aurora B responds to lack of tension across sister kinetochores that are incorrectly attached to the spindle. Bipolar kinetochore attachment forces may pull kinetochore substrates away from inner centromeric Aurora B, which would lead to substrate dephosphorylation, selective stabilization of correct microtubule attachments, and eventually satisfaction of the spindle checkpoint (fig. S1) (8). Despite its central importance, it is not understood how Aurora B accumulates at centromeres (911).

Immunofluorescence microscopy of mitotic cells shows that phosphorylated histone H3 Thr3 (H3T3ph) and Aurora B localize similarly at inner centromeres (Fig. 1A and fig. S2) (12). We therefore tested whether Haspin, which is responsible for generating H3T3ph in mitosis (13, 14), is required for CPC localization. When Haspin was subjected to RNA interference (RNAi) in HeLa cells, a marked reduction in Aurora B at centromeres (greater than fivefold) and an increase on chromosome arms were observed (Fig. 1, B and C). In contrast, Haspin depletion had little effect on the amounts of CPC subunits in mitosis and did not disrupt CPC formation (fig. S3). Similar results were obtained in a human osteosarcoma cell line (U2OS cells), where Haspin RNAi delocalized all CPC components from centromeres (Fig. 2A and fig. S4). Microinjection of H3T3ph-specific antibody into mitotic LLC-PK pig kidney cells caused a similar delocalization of Aurora B (Fig. 1, D and E), indicating that Haspin acts through H3T3ph to position the CPC during mitosis and not through effects at other cell cycle stages.

Fig. 1

Haspin RNAi or microinjection of H3T3ph-specific antibody delocalizes Aurora B from mitotic centromeres. (A) Immunofluorescence microscopy of nocodazole-arrested HeLa chromosome spreads reveals colocalization of H3T3ph and Aurora B. (B and C) Cells were transfected with siRNA and prepared as in (A). The Aurora B/centromere autoantigen intensity ratio was determined by immunofluorescence at ~40 centromeres in nine cells per condition (B). Means + SD are shown (n = 3). ***P < 0.001 by Student’s t test. Example images are shown in (C). (D and E) Nocodazole- and MG132-treated LLC-PK cells were microinjected with H3T3ph-specific antibody. After ~2 hours, cells were subject to immunofluorescence staining for Aurora B and with secondary antibodies against rabbit IgG to reveal microinjected antibody. Line scans of chromosomes are shown in (E). Yellow highlights the centromere. Scale bars, 5 μm unless noted.

Fig. 2

Haspin RNAi delocalizes centromeric MCAK and compromises the spindle checkpoint response but has minor effects on Aurora B activity toward CENP-AS7 and H3S10. (A and B) U2OS cells were transfected with siRNA, treated with nocodazole for 1 to 2 hours, and subjected to immunofluorescence staining. In each condition, ~100 mitotic cells were classified according to the localization of Aurora B (A) or MCAK (B). Means ± SD are shown (n = 3). (C) Example images of cells treated as above. (D) Following treatment as above, the MCAK/centromere autoantigen intensity ratio was determined at ~30 centromeres in 10 or 11 mitotic cells per condition. Means + SD are shown (n = 3). (E) HeLa cells were transfected with siRNA, treated with thymidine for 24 hours, and released into medium containing the compounds indicated. After 18 hours, mitotic indices were determined by flow cytometry with MPM-2 antibody. Means + SD are shown (n = 4). In (D) and (E), ***P < 0.001 by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test compared with corresponding control. (F) Immunofluorescence microscopy of CENP-AS7ph and H3S10ph in mitotic siRNA-transfected U2OS cells. Scale bars, 5 μm.

To determine whether the reduced CPC accumulation at centromeres after Haspin depletion was functionally significant, we first focused on MCAK, a microtubule-depolymerizing kinesin whose inner centromeric localization is dependent on Aurora B (3, 4, 15). Both Aurora B and Haspin RNAi reduced the centromeric enrichment of MCAK in ≥70% of U2OS cells (Fig. 2, B to D) and HeLa cells (fig. S5). Artificial retargeting of Aurora B to centromeres with CENP-B–INCENP (8) largely restored MCAK localization in Haspin-depleted cells (fig. S6). Disruption of CPC activity also compromises the spindle checkpoint response, particularly to low doses of taxol (1620). Consistent with this, HeLa cells transfected with Haspin small interfering RNA (siRNA) were less efficiently arrested in mitosis by taxol than controls were (Fig. 2E). Thus, Haspin appears to influence MCAK localization and checkpoint signaling at centromeres by controlling Aurora B localization.

Two experiments suggest that these effects are not a consequence of defects in chromosome cohesion caused by Haspin RNAi (14). First, Haspin overexpression, which increases cohesion between chromosome arms (14), also influenced Aurora B localization (fig. S7). Second, loss of cohesion induced by depletion of Sgo1 (14, 21, 22) rendered Aurora B localization more diffuse, but it remained enriched at centromeres in >80% of nocodazole-treated cells, and centromeric MCAK was little changed (Fig. 2, A to D). Therefore, as reported elsewhere (14, 2124), loss of centromeric CPC and MCAK is not an inevitable consequence of cohesion loss.

In contrast, Haspin RNAi had minor effects on total CENP-AS7ph and H3S10ph (fig. S8A), although both were reduced by Aurora B RNAi, as expected (2, 5, 16). Haspin RNAi also did not detectably alter total Thr232 autophosphorylation (fig. S8B) or in vitro kinase activity of immunoprecipitated Aurora B (fig. S8C). H3S10ph, CENP-AS7ph, and Aurora B T232ph immunofluorescence remained present in individual U2OS and HeLa cells in which Aurora B and MCAK were delocalized (Fig. 2F and fig. S8, D to F). Thus, Aurora B kinase activation and some of its chromosomal functions appear less sensitive to delocalization of the CPC from inner centromeres than localization of MCAK.

We tested whether H3T3ph plays a direct role in CPC binding at inner centromeres. Biotinylated peptides encompassing residues 1 to 21 of histone H3 with various side-chain modifications were used in “pull-down” experiments from mitotic HeLa cell lysates. Survivin bound strongly to H3(1-21) peptides containing H3T3ph but poorly to unmodified H3(1-21), H4(1-21), or peptides containing H3S10ph or H3T11ph (Fig. 3A and fig. S9A). Borealin, which directly binds Survivin (11, 25), also bound preferentially to H3T3ph peptides (Fig. 3A). Enrichment of Aurora B on H3T3ph peptides was detectable, but weaker than that of Survivin or Borealin (fig. S9A), perhaps because not all CPC components are associated in cell lysates (25). Trimethylation of H3 at Lys4 adjacent to T3ph (H3T3phK4me3) strongly diminished association of CPC components with H3T3ph peptides (Fig. 3A and fig. S9A). Two different recombinant forms of the CPC [the full complex, and a subcomplex containing INCENP(1-58), Survivin, and Dasra A, a Xenopus homolog of Borealin (xISD)] also bound preferentially to H3T3ph peptides, which confirmed that H3T3ph enhances direct binding of the CPC to H3 almost 20-fold (Fig. 3, B and C).

Fig. 3

The CPC binds H3T3ph through Survivin. (A) Lysates of nocodazole-arrested HeLa cells were incubated with bead-immobilized histone peptides. Protein binding was visualized by immunoblotting, and peptide loading by Coomassie blue staining. (B) Binding of recombinant Xenopus CPC to H3 peptides analyzed as above. (C) Binding of Xenopus ISD complex to H3 peptides measured by fluorescence anisotropy. Means ± SD are shown (n = 3). (D) Binding of recombinant human His8-tagged Survivin to H3 peptides visualized by Coomassie blue staining.

Purified recombinant human Survivin also preferentially bound H3T3ph peptides (Fig. 3D, fig. S9B), consistent with previous reports that Survivin is a key factor targeting the CPC to centromeres (9, 19, 20, 26). Similar to previous observations (20, 27), in HeLa cells depleted of endogenous Survivin, the mutation D70A/D71A (in which Asp70 and Asp71 are replaced by Ala) (7) within the BIR domain prevented Survivin from concentrating at centromeres in mitosis, causing it to become diffusely distributed on chromatin (fig. S10, A to C). Survivin-D70A/D71A still localized to the central spindle, however (fig. S10D). Recombinant Survivin-D70A/D71A showed no binding to H3 peptides in vitro (Fig. 3D), which suggested that the failure of Survivin-D70A/D71A to concentrate at centromeres is due to a failure to recognize H3T3ph.

We then tested whether Survivin-D70A/D71A mimicked the effects of Haspin depletion on CPC functions. Indeed, Survivin-D70A/D71A supported CPC formation (fig. S11A) and substantial Aurora B autophosphorylation, H3S10 phosphorylation, and CENP-AS7 phosphorylation but did not restore normal localization of Aurora B or MCAK to inner centromeres (Fig. 4, A to C, and fig S11, B and C) or support spindle checkpoint arrest in the presence of low doses of taxol (fig. S12A). Survivin-D70A/D71A rescued cytokinesis failure caused by Survivin depletion (fig. S12B), but it did not allow normal correction of improper spindle-kinetochore attachments, and an increase in chromosome alignment defects was evident compared with that in cells expressing wild-type Survivin (fig. S12, C and D). Similarly, in chicken DT40 cells expressing Survivin-D72A/D73A (equivalent to D70A/D71A in human Survivin) and in human cells containing Survivin mutated at other sites in the BIR domain, the CPC failed to localize to centromeres, and defects in the spindle checkpoint response to taxol were reported, yet mitotic progression and cytokinesis could still occur (19, 20). Finally, microinjection of H3T3ph-specific antibody into LLC-PK or Xenopus S3 cells also caused mitotic defects consistent with loss of Aurora B activity at centromeres, while leaving intact its function in cytokinesis (Fig. 4D and movies S1 to S4), which further supported a role for H3T3ph in centromeric CPC function.

Fig. 4

CPC function at centromeres requires Survivin binding to H3T3ph. (A) Lysate immunoblotting of nocodazole-arrested HeLa cells stably expressing Survivin-myc (wild-type or D70A/D71A mutant) and transfected with siRNA as indicated. (B) The localization of Aurora B and MCAK was classified by immunofluorescence microscopy in ~100 HeLa cells per condition. Means ± SD are shown (n = 3). (C) Example images of cells treated as in (B). (D) A Xenopus S3 cell microinjected with H3T3ph-specific antibody exits mitosis in the presence of unaligned chromosomes (yellow arrows) with clear formation of a cleavage furrow (red arrows). Time stated in minutes:seconds. Three of three injected S3 cells behaved similarly. See movie S2. Scale bars, 5 μm.

Our results are consistent with a model in which H3T3ph generated by Haspin enhances the binding of the CPC to centromeric chromatin and suggest a molecular basis for the importance of the Survivin BIR domain (9, 19, 20, 27). BIR domains in other molecules use the equivalent of residue Asp71 (D71) to bind the N-terminal Ala of the N-terminal “inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP)–binding motif” (IBM) of proteins such as Smac/DIABLO (28). Survivin binds Smac/DIABLO weakly, but the relevance of this interaction is unclear (29, 30). Instead, the IBM-binding region of the Survivin BIR domain may recognize the N-terminal Ala-Arg-Thr-Lys sequence of histone H3 when Thr3 is phosphorylated, which raises the possibility that other BIR domains act as phospho-specific protein recognition modules.

H3T3ph does not appear to be required for chromatin association or activity of the CPC per se. Rather, H3T3ph contributes to accurate positioning of the CPC at inner centromeres. In this respect, the CPC may resemble heterochromatin protein HP1, which binds histone H3 methylated at Lys9 but can also interact with chromatin by Lys9 methylation–independent mechanisms (31). In addition, H3T3ph prevents H3 from competitively inhibiting Aurora B autophosphorylation, which could facilitate Aurora B activation at inner centromeres (32). Therefore, Haspin might act through H3T3ph to both position and modulate activation of Aurora B at centromeres.

Loss of inner centromeric CPC accumulation has similar differential effects on centromeric Aurora B functions whether caused by Haspin depletion or Survivin-D70A/D71A mutation. Our results imply that proximity to inner centromeric Aurora B is not the sole determinant of substrate phosphorylation at centromeres, likely because substrates have different susceptibilities to phosphorylation and dephosphorylation by Aurora B and phosphatases (fig. S1). It may be valuable to further test the idea that Aurora B target sites are “programmed” to respond differently to microtubule-dependent displacement from the inner centromere, which would allow sophisticated regulation of kinetochore and centromere functions in response to tension.

Supporting Online Material

Materials and Methods

Figs. S1 to S12


Movies S1 to S4

References and Notes

  1. Single-letter abbreviations for the amino acid residues are as follows: A, Ala; C, Cys; D, Asp; E, Glu; F, Phe; G, Gly; H, His; I, Ile; K, Lys; L, Leu; M, Met; N, Asn; P, Pro; Q, Gln; R, Arg; S, Ser; T, Thr; V, Val; W, Trp; and Y, Tyr.
  2. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
  3. We thank W. C. Earnshaw, H. Funabiki, M. A. Lampson, S. M. A. Lens, J. P. Noel, S. S. Taylor, L. Wordeman, and Y. Zheng for cDNAs and antibodies; C. Crafter of AstraZeneca for ZM447439; and H. Funabiki and A. Kelly for sharing unpublished results. J.D. and J.M.G.H. have patents pending on Haspin inhibitors. This work was funded by grants from the American Cancer Society (RSG-05-13401-GMC to J.M.G.H) and the National Institutes of Health (R01-GM074210 to J.M.G.H., R01-GM050412 to G.J.G., and R01-GM063045 to P.T.S.).

Stay Connected to Science

Navigate This Article