Policy ForumEcology

The Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Science-Policy Interface

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  04 Mar 2011:
Vol. 331, Issue 6021, pp. 1139-1140
DOI: 10.1126/science.1202400

You are currently viewing the summary.

View Full Text

Log in to view the full text

Log in through your institution

Log in through your institution


In recognition of our inability to halt damaging ecosystem change (14), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) was asked in December 2010 to convene a meeting “to determine modalities and institutional arrangements” of a new assessment body, akin to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), to track causes and consequences of anthropogenic ecosystem change (5). The “blueprint” for this body, the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), lies in recommendations of an intergovernmental conference held in the Republic of Korea in June 2010: the Busan outcome (6). But it is a blueprint for governance rather than science. Using the experience from past assessments of global biodiversity and ecosystem services change (1, 7, 8) and from the IPCC (911), we ask what the policy-oriented charges in the Busan outcome imply for the science of the assessment process.