Report

Linking Crystallographic Model and Data Quality

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  25 May 2012:
Vol. 336, Issue 6084, pp. 1030-1033
DOI: 10.1126/science.1218231

You are currently viewing the abstract.

View Full Text

Log in to view the full text

Log in through your institution

Log in through your institution

Abstract

In macromolecular x-ray crystallography, refinement R values measure the agreement between observed and calculated data. Analogously, Rmerge values reporting on the agreement between multiple measurements of a given reflection are used to assess data quality. Here, we show that despite their widespread use, Rmerge values are poorly suited for determining the high-resolution limit and that current standard protocols discard much useful data. We introduce a statistic that estimates the correlation of an observed data set with the underlying (not measurable) true signal; this quantity, CC*, provides a single statistically valid guide for deciding which data are useful. CC* also can be used to assess model and data quality on the same scale, and this reveals when data quality is limiting model improvement.

View Full Text

Stay Connected to Science