Neural Correlates of a Magnetic Sense

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  25 May 2012:
Vol. 336, Issue 6084, pp. 1054-1057
DOI: 10.1126/science.1216567

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed.  Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

  • RE: Neural Correlates of a Magnetic Sense
    • Wei Peng, Postdoctoral scholar, UT Southwestern Medical Center

    In Fig. 1, the authors labeled north (Nm) and south (Sm) magnetic poles near north (N) and south (S) geographic pole respectively, which is against the custom within the scientific community. Actually, Nm is next to S and Sm is next to N, which can be found from a textbook (Essentials of college physics, 2006. Raymond A. Serway and Chris Vuille. USA: Cengage Learning. p. 493. ISBN 0-495-10619-4.). This is also explained on the following webpage:
    Although the way shown in this paper is also seen on the Wikipedia webpage (, the original figure includes a bar magnet model, which makes it less misleading. I think it is necessary to keep the scientific rigor and follow the common view when illustrating earth’s magnetic field, even if the points in the paper won’t be affected.

    Competing Interests: None declared.

Stay Connected to Science