Research Article

An Overlapping Protein-Coding Region in Influenza A Virus Segment 3 Modulates the Host Response

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  13 Jul 2012:
Vol. 337, Issue 6091, pp. 199-204
DOI: 10.1126/science.1222213

Influenza's Cryptic Constraint

Because of the well-known pandemic potential of influenza viruses, it is important to understand the range of molecular interactions between the virus and its host. Despite years of intensive research on the virus, Jagger et al. (p. 199, published online 28 June; see the Perspective by Yewdell and Ince) have found that the influenza A virus has been hiding a gene in its small negative-sense RNA genome. An overlapping open reading frame was found contained in the PA viral RNA polymerase gene, which is accessed by ribosomal frameshifting to produce a fusion protein containing the N-terminal messenger RNA (mRNA) endonuclease domain of PA and an alternative C-terminal X domain. The resulting polypeptide, PA-X, selectively degrades host mRNAs and, in a mouse model of infection, modulated cellular immune responses, thus limiting viral pathogenesis.


Influenza A virus (IAV) infection leads to variable and imperfectly understood pathogenicity. We report that segment 3 of the virus contains a second open reading frame (“X-ORF”), accessed via ribosomal frameshifting. The frameshift product, termed PA-X, comprises the endonuclease domain of the viral PA protein with a C-terminal domain encoded by the X-ORF and functions to repress cellular gene expression. PA-X also modulates IAV virulence in a mouse infection model, acting to decrease pathogenicity. Loss of PA-X expression leads to changes in the kinetics of the global host response, which notably includes increases in inflammatory, apoptotic, and T lymphocyte–signaling pathways. Thus, we have identified a previously unknown IAV protein that modulates the host response to infection, a finding with important implications for understanding IAV pathogenesis.

Influenza A virus (IAV) is a single-stranded, segmented, negative-sense RNA virus of the Orthomyxoviridae family (1). Its ecology is complex, encompassing diverse host species, such as both wild and domesticated birds and several mammalian species, including humans, dogs, horses, and pigs. IAV virulence varies widely, depending on virus and host and ranging from completely asymptomatic to nearly 100% lethal. IAV pandemics over the past 100 years have shown case fatality rates varying from ~2% (1918 H1N1) to around 0.05% (2009 H1N1). Although some aspects of this variability can be explained, IAV pathogenesis remains imperfectly understood and difficult to predict (2).

IAV genome segment 3 produces a single, unspliced mRNA that encodes a subunit of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase complex (PA). PA provides an RNA-endonuclease activity—contained in an N-terminal domain—that cleaves capped RNA fragments from cellular pre-mRNAs to provide primers for viral transcription (35). Ectopic expression of PA from plasmid has been shown to inhibit the accumulation of other coexpressed proteins, a phenomenon proposed to result from proteolytic activity, either nonspecific (6) or possibly resulting from degradation of RNA polymerase II (7, 8). A genome-wide survey of IAV synonymous codon usage aimed at identifying RNA packaging signals discovered a highly conserved internal region in segment 3 that did not correlate with any known or predicted RNA structural or functional motifs (9, 10). Here, we present evidence that the reduced synonymous variation in this region reflects a hitherto unrecognized overlapping open reading frame (termed here “X-ORF”) that is accessed by ribosomal frameshifting to produce a distinct PA-related polypeptide with a role in host-cell shutoff, modulation of host gene expression, and, consequently, limitation of viral pathogenesis.

To further investigate the unexplained region of conservation in IAV segment 3, we measured synonymous site conservation in an alignment of >1000 representative segment 3 sequences. The observed number of synonymous substitutions in a nine-codon sliding window was compared with the number expected under a null model of neutral evolution at synonymous sites (11). This analysis confirmed the presence of the 5′- and 3′-terminal conserved regions involved in genome packaging (10), as well as an additional region of prominent synonymous site conservation between PA codons 190 and 253 (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, there was a notable absence of stop codons in the +1, but not the +2, reading frame within this region (Fig. 1B), suggestive of an overlapping ORF (X). As noted previously (10), there are no conserved AUG codons that could initiate independent translation of this ORF, nor could we identify any conserved splice donor-acceptor combinations that might allow access to it. However, a highly conserved UCC UUU CGU C motif was identified near the 5′ end of the X-ORF (table S1), despite the fact that both Ser (UCC) and Arg (CGU), in principle, could each be encoded by any of five other codons.

Fig. 1

Characterization of a ribosomal FS signal in IAV segment 3. (A) PA-frame synonymous site conservation in an alignment of 1278 representative full-length PA coding sequences. Shown is the synonymous substitution rate relative to the PA segment average (observed/expected) and the corresponding statistical significance (P value). (B) Positions of stop codons (blue triangles) in the three reading frames in 71 representative PA coding sequences. (C) PA-X ORF structure, showing full-length PA in frame 0 and the X-ORF in frame 1, with experimental mutations indicated. (D and E) Detection of frameshifting in rabbit reticulocyte lysate by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and autoradiography of in vitro translated (IVT) reactions. (D) Dual reporter constructs separated by the putative ribosomal frameshifting signal from PR8 segment 3 along with 100-nucleotide 5′- and 3′-flanking sequences. WT, wild-type sequence; FS mutant, shift site UUU CGU mutated to UUC AGA; IFC, in-frame control. The calculated frameshifting efficiencies (means ± SEM, n = 4) are shown. (E) IVT reactions were programmed with full-length segment 3 constructs from the 1918 virus and analyzed before (total) or after (α-X) immunoprecipitation with rabbit 1918 X antiserum. Lane 5 of the bottom panel shows a WT IVT immunoprecipitated with a preimmune bleed. Polypeptides of interest are indicated.

We hypothesized that +1 ribosomal frameshifting on this motif could lead to expression of X as a fusion with the N-terminal domain of PA (PAN). Frameshifting in the +1 direction can be stimulated by a slow-to-decode codon in the ribosomal A-site, which results in a pause in decoding that may allow a proportion of ribosomes to shift reading frame (12). Frameshifting efficiency depends on the relative speed with which the 0 frame and +1 frame A-site codons can be decoded, the potential for P-site codon:anticodon re-pairing in the +1 reading frame, and the relative stability of the P-site codon:anticodon duplex in the two alternative reading frames, as well as other poorly defined factors that may involve the E-site codon. Thus, +1 slippage might occur when UUU is positioned in the ribosomal P-site with the rare codon CGU in the A-site. CGU is one of the most seldom used codons in both mammalian and avian genomes. Both UUU and UUC are translated by a single transfer RNA tRNAPhe isoacceptor whose anticodon, GAA, has a higher affinity for UUC than for UUU, which favors P-site re-pairing to UUC in the +1 frame (13). Such a frameshift (FS) event would produce a 29-kD fusion protein, termed PA-X, comprising the N-terminal endonuclease domain of PA (4, 5) and, in most isolates, a novel 61–amino acid C terminus from the X-ORF (Fig. 1C). In a minority of isolates, largely of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 lineage, a shorter 41–amino acid X domain is predicted.

The frameshifting hypothesis was tested by cloning the putative FS site and flanking sequences from influenza A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) (PR8) segment 3 between Renilla and firefly luciferase ORFs such that a +1 FS event would give rise to a fusion product of the two reporter polypeptides (14). These constructs were in vitro translated in rabbit reticulocyte lysates, which demonstrated frameshifting at an efficiency of ~1.3% in a wild-type (WT) construct, whereas mutation of the FS motif from UUU CGU to UUC AGA reduced frameshifting to ~0.2% (Fig. 1D). Further mutagenesis of the region supported the proposed mechanism of frameshifting stimulated by a combination of the rare (A-site) codon CGU, the (E-site) codon UCC, and possibly more distal elements in the 5′ flanking sequence (fig. S1).

To test if frameshifting occurred in the context of full-length IAV segment 3, we in vitro translated plasmids containing WT and mutant A/Brevig Mission/1/1918 (1918) segment 3. The WT segment produced full-length PA and several smaller polypeptide species, including a ~29-kD product (Fig. 1E, lane 2). The last-named species comigrated with the polypeptide produced from a plasmid in which cytosine 598 (the base predicted to be “skipped” during the FS event; see Fig. 1C and fig. S2 for details on the 1918 mutations used) had been deleted to put the X-ORF in frame with the PAN coding region (delC) (Fig. 1E, lane 4). This band was much reduced when the FS site was mutated (lane 3), whereas a faster-migrating species was seen when a premature termination codon (PTC) was introduced into the X-ORF (Fig. 1E, lane 5). Next, we raised an antiserum against an X-derived peptide and subjected selected in vitro translation products to immunoprecipitation. Both the delC product and the corresponding species from WT 1918 translation reactions were precipitated by the antiserum against X (anti-X), but not preimmune antisera (Fig. 1E and fig. S3, A to C). However, no anti-X–specific product was precipitated from the FS mutant samples. We also detected X-ORF expression in plasmid transfected cells that again was dependent on an intact FS site and was sensitive to the introduction of a premature X-ORF stop codon (fig. S3, D and E). Thus, the X-ORF is accessed by ribosomal frameshifting.

Next, we considered the potential function of the PA-X polypeptide. Because it incorporates the PA endonuclease domain, but not the PA C-terminal domain that interacts with the PB1 subunit of the viral polymerase, we hypothesized that it might act independently of the polymerase as an mRNA endonuclease. By analogy to the herpes simplex virus vhs protein (15), PA-X might therefore have a role in host-cell shutoff, a phenomenon seen in many virus infections in which cellular gene expression is inhibited to hinder the induction of an antiviral response, as well as to divert ribosomes toward translation of viral mRNAs (16). To test this, we used plasmids encoding β-galactosidase (β-gal) or the PR8 nucleoprotein (NP) as reporters in cotransfection assays with WT or mutant forms of 1918 segment 3. The WT 1918 segment 3 potently repressed β-gal expression (Fig. 2A), consistent with previous observations (6). However, this activity was abolished by the FS mutation and weakened by the insertion of a PTC in X; both of these alterations are silent in the PA gene (fig. S2). Furthermore, the delC construct, which expresses PA-X but not PA, exhibited strong repressive activity (Fig. 2A). The same pattern of repression by the delC construct or WT segment 3 was seen when NP was used as the reporter, and again, the activity was abolished by the FS mutation (Fig. 2, B and C). The inhibitory activity of segment 3 was originally proposed to result from protease activity (6), whereas our hypothesis predicted an effect on RNA, mediated by the endonuclease activity. To test this, we introduced mutations known to abolish PA endonuclease activity in which alanine replaces aspartic acid at position 108 and glutamic acid at position 80 (D108A and E80A, respectively) (4). These mutations eliminated the repressive activity on protein expression, whether in the background of otherwise WT segment 3 or in the delC construct (Fig. 2, A to C). Furthermore, as predicted by the messenger RNA endonuclease (mRNase) hypothesis, examination of NP reporter gene mRNA levels showed that WT segment 3 and the delC construct reduced mRNA accumulation severalfold compared with FS-mutant, endonuclease-mutant, and control cotransfections, in a manner that correlated with reporter protein abundance (Fig. 2, C and D). Overall, these data indicate that the ability of segment 3 to inhibit plasmid-mediated gene expression is a property mediated by PA-X, not PA, and support the hypothesis that repression results from an mRNA endonuclease activity.

Fig. 2

PA-X–mediated repression of plasmid-driven gene expression. Human embryonic kidney (HEK 293T) cells were cotransfected with reporter plasmids encoding (A) β-galactosidase or (B to D) IAV NP, as well as the indicated “effector” plasmids (400 ng unless indicated otherwise). (A) β-Galactosidase accumulation was measured by enzymatic assay. Values plotted are the means ± SEM of three experiments normalized to the level seen with an empty plasmid vector as effector. (B) NP, PA, and tubulin (as a loading control) accumulation was measured by Western blot and (C) quantified from replicate experiments using LiCor Odyssey software. Note in (B) that the same membrane was reprobed for tubulin; residual NP staining is apparent as a doublet running just above tubulin. (D) NP mRNA and 5S rRNA (as a loading control) were measured by urea-PAGE and autoradiography of radioactive primer extension assays. (C) NP mRNA accumulation from (D) was quantified by densitometry. Values plotted in (C) are the means ± range of two independent experiments, normalized to the control where the PB2 subunit of the viral polymerase was cotransfected in place of PA.

We next sought to determine whether PA-X is expressed during viral infection and what consequence this has for virus replication. Accordingly, we generated sets of viruses based around the 1918 segment 3, with or without mutations affecting PA-X expression: either the fully reconstructed 1918 virus, or reassortants between PR8 and 1918, where either all 1918 ribonucleoprotein genes (segments 1 to 3 and 5; 1918 RNP) or only 1918 segment 3 (1918 PA) were introduced. To test if PA-X could be detected during infection, radiolabeled cell lysates were prepared from cells infected with parental or FS mutant viruses containing the 1918 segment 3 and immunoprecipitated with anti-X or preimmune sera. A polypeptide of the expected molecular weight (migrating above a prominent M1/NS1 background band) was precipitated by anti-X but not by the preimmune bleed from cells infected with parental but not FS mutant viruses (Fig. 3A), which confirmed expression of PA-X during virus infection. Western blot analysis showed that the synonymous FS site mutation did not affect PA accumulation in infected cells (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3

Characterization of PA-X mutant viruses. (A) MDCK cells infected with the indicated viruses were metabolically labeled with [35S]methionine from 3 to 8 hours post infection. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-X or the corresponding preimmune (PreI) serum, and bound fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Aliquots of IVT PA-X were run in parallel as markers. The migration of molecular mass standards is also indicated. (B) Lysates from cells infected with the indicated viruses were analyzed by Western blotting for PA. (C) Virus titers from MDCK cells (infected at a multiplicity of infection of ~0.001) or embryonated eggs (inoculated with 1000 PFU) were determined by plaque assay. Data are the means ± SEM of two to six separate inoculations, except for 1918-PTC, which was grown once. (D and E) Lysates from MDCK cells infected with the indicated 1918 RNP viruses and metabolically labeled for 45-min periods ending at the times shown were (D) analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. (E) Actin synthesis at 8 hours post infection was quantified by densitometry. Data plotted are means ± SEM of three independent experiments. Two-tailed P values are indicated: ***P < 0.0001; **P = 0.003; *P = 0.01.

To test the effect of the loss of PA-X expression on virus growth, end-point titers of low-multiplicity infections of Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells or embryonated chicken eggs were determined. FS mutant viruses propagated efficiently in either system, and although the 1918 RNP-FS virus grew in MDCKs to titers ~1/10th of those seen in WT virus and somewhat lower titers in eggs (Fig. 3C), the differences were not statistically significant. In addition, no differences were seen when single- or multicycle growth kinetics of the 1918 viruses was tested in MDCK cells (fig. S4, A and B). Next, we tested whether altering PA-X expression had an effect on host-cell shutoff. Cells were infected with WT, FS, or PTC 1918 RNP viruses, and protein synthesis was monitored across a time course of infection by metabolic labeling. All infections produced abundant quantities of virus polypeptides from 4 hours after infection, with the expected pattern of delayed late gene M1 and hemagglutinin (HA) expression (Fig. 3D). In the case of the WT virus, this was accompanied by reduced background cellular protein synthesis from 4 to 6 hours onward. Host-cell shutoff, however, was highly attenuated in cells infected with the FS mutant virus and delayed in cells infected with the PTC virus. Densitometric quantification of actin synthesis (the most prominent cellular polypeptide in these experiments) at 8 hours confirmed the significantly reduced ability of the PA-X mutant viruses to inhibit cellular gene expression (Fig. 3E and fig. S4C). These data supported the hypothesis that PA-X has a function in host-cell shutoff.

We next investigated the impact of mutating PA-X expression on pathogenesis in an experimental mouse model of influenza infection, using the fully reconstructed 1918 pandemic virus. The 1918 virus background was chosen to evaluate changes in pathogenicity because it induces clinical symptoms in mice without prior adaptation. Additionally, recent data suggest that the current human population may be protected from the 1918 H1N1 virus because of prior infection by, or immunization against, the 2009 H1N1 pandemic virus (17, 18). Because PA-X is a conserved feature of IAV and because PA-X–deficient viruses exhibited decreased host-cell shutoff capacity in vitro, it was expected that such viruses would be attenuated in vivo. To follow the clinical course of infection, 100 plaque-forming units (PFU) of 1918-WT, -FS, or -PTC viruses were inoculated intranasally into BALB/c mice, and daily weights were taken in an Animal Biosafety Level 3+ select agent–approved laboratory (in accordance with the select agent guidelines of the National Institutes of Health and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and under the supervision of the NIH Select Agent Program and the NIH Department of Health and Safety). The 1918-FS–infected mice displayed more weight loss than the 1918-WT–infected mice at a dose of 100 PFU [P < 0.0001 8 days post infection (DPI)], whereas 1918-PTC–infected mice displayed an intermediate disease severity phenotype (P = 0.008 versus WT, P = 0.007 versus FS, at 8 DPI) (Fig. 4A). Although no survival differences were observed between 1918-WT and 1918-FS at doses of 10 PFU and 1000 PFU, survival of the 1918-FS–infected mice at a dose of 100 PFU was significantly decreased compared with WT (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 4B). This difference corresponded with a <1 log decrease in the calculated 50% mouse lethal dose (MLD50), from 102.4 PFU for the 1918-WT virus to 101.6 PFU for the 1918-FS virus. Virus-infected mice were humanely killed on 3, 5, and 8 days post inoculation, and lungs were harvested for virus titration and histopathologic examination. Viral replication in lungs was similar among 1918-WT–, 1918-FS–, and 1918-PTC–infected mice at these three time points (Fig. 4C). Similarly, there was no apparent difference in the histopathologic changes, nature of the inflammatory infiltrate, or viral antigen distribution among the viruses (fig. S5).

Fig. 4

Mutation of PA-X affects IAV pathogenicity in a murine model. (A) Mean weight loss of mice infected with 100 PFU of 1918-WT, -FS, and -PTC viruses (n = 15, 15, and 10, respectively). Mice were humanely killed when they lost ≥25% of their initial body weight; no mice were found dead. Error bars represent ±SEM. (B) Survival proportions of mice infected with 10 (dotted line), 100 (solid line), or 1000 (squares in line) PFU of 1918-WT, -FS, and -PTC viruses. Data for WT and FS in (A) and (B) are pooled results obtained with two independently rescued sets of viruses, one set of which was subjected to high-throughput, full-genome sequencing to confirm that the only changes between WT and FS were those deliberately introduced in PA. (C) Mean infectious titers of 1918 viruses in homogenized mouse lungs. Error bars represent the SEM. (D) Expression profile heat maps generated from whole-lung RNA isolated from mice killed at 3, 5, and 8 DPI (n = 4 per virus, per time point), displaying sequences that showed a ≥two-fold difference from mock-infected mouse lungs in at least one experimental group. Each column represents data from an individual experiment; rows represent unique sequences; and row-gene identities are preserved across time points. Genes in red are up-regulated, those in blue are down-regulated, and those in black do not differ compared with a pool of RNA isolated from six mock-infected control mice. (E and F) Gene ontology analysis of sequences whose expression levels differed significantly (P < 0.01, ≥two-fold expression level difference) between 1918-WT– and -FS–infected lung tissue at 3 DPI with 100 PFU. (E) Top-scoring functional categories. (F) Top pathways within color-coded functional categories.

Global transcriptional profiling was also performed on 3, 5, and 8 DPI to determine whether changes in PA-X expression affected the character of the host response compared with a nonlethal dose of the WT 1918 influenza virus infection. Gene expression analysis was performed on RNA isolated from the lungs of individual infected mice (four per group) and compared with a pool of RNA isolated from control animals by oligonucleotide microarray. “Heat map” profiles of sequences showing a twofold or higher change in expression relative to mock controls of the individual animals showed that at each time point, at a dose of 100 PFU, 1918-FS and -PTC viruses induced a host transcriptional response different from that of the 1918-WT virus, particularly at earlier time points (Fig. 4D). However, comparison of the host response to 1918-FS and 1918-PTC viral infection showed a high degree of similarity to responses of mice infected with a five times as high, lethal dose of the 1918-WT virus (fig. S6). Thus, mutation of PA-X in the 1918-FS and 1918-PTC viruses changed the kinetics and magnitude of the host response in infected mice.

Although a subset of cellular genes were expressed in greater amounts in animals infected with the mutant viruses (especially at earlier time points), in general, there was a significant reduction of cellular gene expression in the lungs of mice infected with PA-X–deficient 1918 viruses, similar to that previously reported for lethal infections with the 1918-WT virus (19). Further analysis of sequences showing differential expression between 1918-WT and 1918-FS or -PTC viruses was therefore done to identify potential cellular pathways associated with the moderately increased pathogenicity of the mutant viruses. Standard t tests identified ~5000 genes that showed significantly different expression levels (at least twofold difference in median expression level, P < 0.01) between 1918-WT and either 1918-FS or -PTC viruses at each time point (fig. S7). Although genetically distinct strategies were used to compromise PA-X expression in the 1918-FS and -PTC mutant viruses, the host response to these two viruses was similar. Many genes identified as differentially regulated in 1918-FS as compared with 1918-WT were also differentially regulated in 1918-PTC (fig. S7). Fewer differences in gene expression were observed between 1918-FS– and 1918–PTC–infected animals, which further emphasized the similarity in the response of host gene expression to these viruses. Moreover, in concordance with global expression data (fig. S6), the host response at 8 DPI of 1918-FS– and 1918-PTC–infected animals was more similar to that of animals given a lethal 500 PFU dose of 1918-WT than to the comparable 100 PFU 1918-WT–infected animals (fig. S7).

Gene ontology analysis indicated that sequences showing differential expression between 1918-WT and 1918-FS infection were associated predominantly with inflammation or immune response, apoptosis, cell differentiation, and tissue remodeling (Fig. 4E). Interestingly, the majority of differentially regulated immune response and/or inflammation sequences were related to lymphocyte activation and/or proliferation or other aspects of cell-mediated immunity, including interferon-γ (IFN-γ), the chemokine receptor CCR5, CD28, and interleukin-7 (IL-7) and (IL-15) signaling (Fig. 4F). Many of these genes were more highly induced in the 1918-FS– and 1918-PTC–infected animals relative to 1918-WT–infected animals. Many of the differentially regulated apoptosis-related genes are also functionally related to lymphocytes, including Fas pathway signaling and lymphotoxins, similar to genes examined in previous high-dose 1918 studies (19). In addition, several major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I–associated genes showed up-regulation earlier in 1918-FS (by 3 DPI) compared with 1918-WT (8 DPI) (fig. S8). By contrast, sequences involved in cell adhesion, including many integrins and extracellular matrix components, showed decreased expression during infection with 1918-FS and -PTC viruses. Collectively, these data support the hypothesis that PA-X plays a role in modulating host gene expression during infection with the 1918 pandemic virus.

The data presented here—derived from genomic, biochemical, functional, and in vivo studies—demonstrate the existence of a 13th protein, termed PA-X, in the IAV proteome. PA-X is a fusion protein incorporating the N-terminal endonuclease domain of the PA protein with a short C-terminal domain, encoded by an overlapping ORF (“X”) in segment 3 that is accessed by +1 ribosomal frameshifting. Ribosomal frameshifting has not been previously reported in IAV. The proteins PB1-N40 (20) and PB1-F2 (21) are also recent discoveries in the IAV proteome, and it is interesting that the X-ORF exhibits greater codon-level conservation than does PB1-F2, which is also expressed from an overlapping ORF (10, 22, 23). We show functional data primarily for the 1918 pandemic virus, but on the basis of the conserved nature of the FS sequence (98%; table S1) and the prevalence of the downstream X-ORF (>99.5% of IAV genomes contain either 61- or 41-codon X-ORFs), as well as its codon-level conservation (Fig. 1A), we predict that expression of PA-X is a nearly universal feature of IAV. Note that there are lineage-specific differences in the distribution of X-ORF lengths. The ~75% of sequenced isolates that have a 61-codon X-ORF represent virtually all host species and HA/NA subtypes, whereas the ~25% of isolates with a 41-codon X-ORF are overwhelmingly from the 2009 H1N1 swine-origin pandemic virus plus, a minority subset of swine H3N2 and swine H1N2 viruses, the parental source of the 2009 pandemic segment 3 (24). Functional analyses of the differences in these PA-X variants will require additional experimentation. Although the biochemical properties of PA-X [including the function(s) of the X-domain] await a full characterization, cotransfection reporter assays suggest that PA-X can act as an mRNase by virtue of the PAN endonuclease domain, in a manner evocative of the herpes simplex virus vhs protein (15). Thus, the substrate range and specificity of PA-X will be particularly interesting areas for further research.

PA-X expression was not required for viral replication, and indeed, by virtue of its expression mechanism, only low levels of the protein were expressed during WT viral infection. However, PA-X–deficient viruses differed from the WT counterpart in their ability to cause host-cell shutoff and, moreover, caused greater clinical disease in a mouse model of IAV infection, an outcome related to an accelerated host response as assessed by microarray. PA-X is thus an accessory IAV protein that plays a consequential role at the virus-host interface. We hypothesize that defective control of host gene expression by the mutant viruses in the minority of infected lung cells provokes an altered cascade of host responses from the majority of uninfected cells. The nature of these host gene expression changes—including marked early overexpression of MHC class I genes in 1918-FS or -PTC infections, compared with 1918-WT infections—suggests that these perturbations in host response pathways affect lymphocyte activation and immune cell function that lead to an immunopathogenic inflammatory response (19). This may explain the lack of significant differences in weight loss in mice infected with 1918-WT versus 1918-FS and -PTC viruses until 5 to 8 DPI, which coincides with the appearance of influenza-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (25).

Taken together, these data contribute substantially to our understanding of IAV replication and pathogenesis and further suggest promising lines of inquiry into the anti-IAV immune response, as well as the factors driving IAV evolution. It is noteworthy that the outcome of infection with PA-X–null viruses was altered in the absence of differences in viral replication, as this suggests that host immunopathology is of central importance in determining the character of disease and could therefore be a fruitful target for new therapeutics aimed at ameliorating severe IAV illness (19, 26).

Supplementary Materials

Materials and Methods

Supplementary Text

Figs. S1 to S8

Table S1

References (2733)

References and Notes

  1. Acknowledgments: A.E.F. is supported by the Wellcome Trust (088789). P.D. was supported by the U.K. Medical Research Council (G0700815) and Wellcome Trust (073126). This work was supported in part by the intramural funds of the NIH and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), NIH. J.F.A. is supported by Science Foundation Ireland (08/IN.1/B1889). K.-A.W. and A.O. were funded by Defense Threat Reduction Agency contract HDTRA-1-08-C-0023, the Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, and the University of Luxembourg. G.L.B. and A.L. were supported by studentships from the U.K. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and the Cambridge Infectious Disease Consortium, respectively. We thank the Comparative Medicine Branch (NIAID, NIH) for assistance with animal studies and M. Howard (Utah) for the pDluc variant of the dual luciferase vector. We also thank a number of colleagues for helpful discussion, including J. Gog and L. Tiley (University of Cambridge), W. Barclay (Imperial College London), Y. J. Tao (Rice University), J. I. Cohen, K. Subbarao, K. C. Zoon, D. C. Wilson, M. M. Gottesman, R. Wyatt, and H. Metzger (NIH). B.W.J., P.D., and J.K.T. are also thankful for the support of the NIH-Oxford-Cambridge Research Scholars program. The Gene Expression Omnibus accession no. for microarray data is GSE38112.
View Abstract

Stay Connected to Science

Navigate This Article