Review

Cancer Genome Landscapes

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  29 Mar 2013:
Vol. 339, Issue 6127, pp. 1546-1558
DOI: 10.1126/science.1235122
  • Fig. 1

    Number of somatic mutations in representative human cancers, detected by genome-wide sequencing studies. (A) The genomes of a diverse group of adult (right) and pediatric (left) cancers have been analyzed. Numbers in parentheses indicate the median number of nonsynonymous mutations per tumor. (B) The median number of nonsynonymous mutations per tumor in a variety of tumor types. Horizontal bars indicate the 25 and 75% quartiles. MSI, microsatellite instability; SCLC, small cell lung cancers; NSCLC, non–small cell lung cancers; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinomas; MSS, microsatellite stable; EAC, esophageal adenocarcinomas. The published data on which this figure is based are provided in table S1C.

    CREDIT: FIG. 1A, E. COOK
  • Fig. 2

    Genetic alterations and the progression of colorectal cancer. The major signaling pathways that drive tumorigenesis are shown at the transitions between each tumor stage. One of several driver genes that encode components of these pathways can be altered in any individual tumor. Patient age indicates the time intervals during which the driver genes are usually mutated. Note that this model may not apply to all tumor types. TGF-β, transforming growth factor–β.

    CREDIT: FIG. 2, E. COOK
  • Fig. 3

    Total alterations affecting protein-coding genes in selected tumors. Average number and types of genomic alterations per tumor, including single-base substitutions (SBS), small insertions and deletions (indels), amplifications, and homozygous deletions, as determined by genome-wide sequencing studies. For colorectal, breast, and pancreatic ductal cancer, and medulloblastomas, translocations are also included. The published data on which this figure is based are provided in table S1D.

  • Fig. 4

    Distribution of mutations in two oncogenes (PIK3CA and IDH1) and two tumor suppressor genes (RB1 and VHL). The distribution of missense mutations (red arrowheads) and truncating mutations (blue arrowheads) in representative oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes are shown. The data were collected from genome-wide studies annotated in the COSMIC database (release version 61). For PIK3CA and IDH1, mutations obtained from the COSMIC database were randomized by the Excel RAND function, and the first 50 are shown. For RB1 and VHL, all mutations recorded in COSMIC are plotted. aa, amino acids.

  • Fig. 5

    Number and distribution of driver gene mutations in five tumor types. The total number of driver gene mutations [in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes (TSGs)] is shown, as well as the number of oncogene mutations alone. The driver genes are listed in tables S2A and S2B. Translocations are not included in this figure, because few studies report translocations along with the other types of genetic alterations on a per-case basis. In the tumor types shown here, translocations affecting driver genes occur in less than 10% of samples. The published data on which this figure is based are provided in table S1E.

  • Fig. 6

    Four types of genetic heterogeneity in tumors, illustrated by a primary tumor in the pancreas and its metastatic lesions in the liver. Mutations introduced during primary tumor cell growth result in clonal heterogeneity. At the top left, a typical tumor is represented by cells with a large fraction of the total mutations (founder cells) from which subclones are derived. The differently colored regions in the subclones represent stages of evolution within a subclone. (A) Intratumoral: heterogeneity among the cells of the primary tumor. (B) Intermetastatic: heterogeneity among different metastatic lesions in the same patient. In the case illustrated here, each metastasis was derived from a different subclone. (C) Intrametastatic: heterogeneity among the cells of each metastasis develops as the metastases grow. (D) Interpatient: heterogeneity among the tumors of different patients. The mutations in the founder cells of the tumors of these two patients are almost completely distinct (see text).

    CREDIT: FIG. 6, E. COOK
  • Fig. 7

    Cancer cell signaling pathways and the cellular processes they regulate. All of the driver genes listed in table S2 can be classified into one or more of 12 pathways (middle ring) that confer a selective growth advantage (inner circle; see main text). These pathways can themselves be further organized into three core cellular processes (outer ring). The publications on which this figure is based are provided in table S5.

  • Fig. 8

    Signal transduction pathways affected by mutations in human cancer. Two representative pathways from Fig. 7 (RAS and PI3K) are illustrated. The signal transducers are color coded: red indicates protein components encoded by the driver genes listed in table S2; yellow balls denote sites of phosphorylation. Examples of therapeutic agents that target some of the signal transducers are shown. RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase; GDP, guanosine diphosphate; MEK, MAPK kinase; ERK, extracellular signal–regulated kinase; NFkB, nuclear factor κB; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin.

    CREDIT: FIG. 8, A. DIXON
  • Cancer Genome Landscapes

    Bert Vogelstein, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Victor E. Velculescu, Shibin Zhou, Luis A. Diaz Jr., Kenneth W. Kinzler

    Materials/Methods, Supplementary Text, Tables, Figures, and/or References

    Table S1 to S4
    Table S5

Navigate This Article