The Strength of Impurities
The practical strength of a material (rather than its theoretical strength) is influenced by the presence of defects between crystalline domains and the inclusion of impurities. In some cases, synergistic effects may arise where the impurity atoms segregate to the domain boundaries, although kinetic barriers may limit the extent to which the impurity atoms can order. Nie et al. (p. 957) show the segregation of oversized and undersized solute atoms at coherent twin boundaries in a magnesium alloy. The minimization of strain energy drives the differently sized impurities to different twin boundaries, strengthening the material.
Abstract
The formability and mechanical properties of many engineering alloys are intimately related to the formation and growth of twins. Understanding the structure and chemistry of twin boundaries at the atomic scale is crucial if we are to properly tailor twins to achieve a new range of desired properties. We report an unusual phenomenon in magnesium alloys that until now was thought unlikely: the equilibrium segregation of solute atoms into patterns within fully coherent terraces of deformation twin boundaries. This ordered segregation provides a pinning effect for twin boundaries, leading to a concomitant but unusual situation in which annealing strengthens rather than weakens these alloys. The findings point to a platform for engineering nano-twinned structures through solute atoms. This may lead to new alloy compositions and thermomechanical processes.
Interfaces such as twin and grain boundaries play a critical role in plastic deformation and ultimately in controlling the formability and mechanical properties of many engineering materials (1–5); notable examples are lightweight magnesium (Mg) alloys, which have received considerable attention for applications leading to fuel efficiency and green environment (6). Like other commonly used metals such as titanium (Ti), zirconium (Zr), and zinc (Zn), Mg has a hexagonal structure with fewer slip systems than those of cubic materials. To readily form Mg products requires the activation of twinning modes for plastic deformation. As an emerging class of engineering materials, Mg alloys are less strong than the counterpart aluminum alloys, implying the need for more efficient barriers in order to impede the motion of dislocations and twin boundaries. The control of deformation twinning during thermomechanical processes and applications is a major technical barrier to the wider application of Mg (7). Twinning occurs predominantly in the
In contrast with partially coherent interfaces such as high-angle grain boundaries and symmetrical tilt boundaries with arrays of misfit dislocations, for which segregation of alloying elements is well established (20–22), fully coherent twin boundaries have low interfacial energies, and solute segregation in such boundaries is therefore not expected. We studied this issue using high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) to observe the migration and segregation of randomly distributed solute atoms to fully coherent terraces of deformation twin boundaries in Mg alloys. Solutes consisted of gadolinium (Gd) (which is larger than Mg and represents rare-earth elements that are major alloying additions in many commercial Mg alloys), Zn (which is smaller than Mg and a major alloying element in some commonly used Mg alloys), and mixtures of Gd and Zn (table S1). We also analyzed the experimental observations using first-principles calculations (fig. S1) and continuum estimates and the impact of the solute segregation on mechanical properties using compression tests. Alloy compositions, the preparation and testing conditions and characterizations, and the details of the computations are available in the supplementary materials.
Microstructural examination of the deformed samples of all alloys indicated the existence of many twins—generally
(A) Schematic illustration and (B) -perspective view of α-Mg lattice. The
,
, and
planes are blue, red, and purple, respectively. (C, E, and G) HAADF-STEM images showing
,
, and
twin boundaries (TBs) in Mg–0.2 atomic % Gd [(C) and (G)] and Mg–0.8 atomic % Gd (E) solid solution alloys. (D, F, and H) Close-ups of (C), (E), and (G), schematically illustrated in (I to K). In (B) and (I) to (K), atoms in the A layer are blue (in the paper plane) or purple (out of the paper plane) and yellow (in) or orange (out) in the B layer. Sample details are available in table S1.
Shown in Fig. 2 are
HAADF-STEM images showing TBs in (A and B) Mg–1.9 atomic % Zn and (C and D) Mg–1.0 atomic % Gd–0.4 atomic % Zn–0.2 atomic % Zr alloys. (E) and (F) are schematic illustrations of (B) and (D). Sample details are available in table S1.
The in-plane atomic local strain hydrostatic invariant (ALSHI) in
(A to C) In-plane ALSHI in,
, and
TBs of pure Mg, respectively, and in
after segregation of (D) Gd into extension sites, (E) Zn into compression sites, and (F) Gd and Zn into extension sites. The color strip at the left shows the strain magnitude. (G) System total energy reduction with solute concentration in a
boundary. (H and I) ALSHI in
boundary with Gd in the extension sites, and with Zn segregated into (H) extension and (I) compression sites. (J) System total energy reduction with various Gd and Zn segregations in
boundary. The viewing direction is parallel to
for (A) to (F) and perpendicular to
for (H) and (I). ∆EA and ∆EV represent the reductions in system total energy normalized by TB area and volume, respectively. A detailed explanation is available in the supplementary materials.
Thermodynamically, the segregation or aggregation of Gd or Zn atoms (or both) is not expected to occur within the Mg solid solution, particularly when the concentration of added solute atoms is below the equilibrium solid solubility at the annealing temperature. However, when elastic strains associated with twin boundaries were introduced into the solid solution matrix, the segregation of Gd or Zn atoms, or both, into the strained sites led to reduced elastic strain energies associated with Gd or Zn atoms and twin boundaries. The DFT computations and continuum estimates both indicated that the ordered segregation of solute atoms in twin boundaries was driven by the minimization of the total energy (fig. S5) and elastic strain energy (table S4) in the system and did indeed reach equilibrium. These periodic solute segregation patterns can be considered as grain boundary “complexions” (4, 25, 26): They are thermodynamically stable only in twin boundaries.
We examined the effects of this phenomenon on the mobility of twin boundaries in and the deformation behavior of Mg alloys, finding that the ordered distribution of solute atoms exerted a stronger pinning effect on any further migration of the twin boundary than expected for individual solute atoms and, hence, a larger strengthening effect. Experimentally, we studied the pinning effect with two identical specimens of a Mg–Gd solid solution alloy. Both samples were unloaded immediately after compressed to 0.025 strain. After unloading, one specimen was compressed again to an accumulated strain of 0.045, whereas the other was annealed at 150°C for 3 hours and compressed again to an accumulated strain of 0.045. We observed twins in both samples after the first compression (Fig. 4, A and C). For the sample without annealing, we detected further growth of twins generated during the first compression (Fig. 4B, red arrow). The boundaries of most twins were noticeably expanded by the second compression. For the annealed specimen, the size and shape of most preexisting twins remained almost unchanged (Fig. 4, C and D), but some new, small-sized twins also formed (Fig. 4D, red arrow). Analogous experiments on a Mg–0.4 atomic % Zn solid solution alloy yielded a similar but less thermally stable pinning effect (Fig. 4, E to H, and fig. S8).
(A to D) Optical micrographs showing twins in Mg–0.2 atomic % Gd alloy. (A) Sample compressed to a strain of 0.025, and (B) unloaded and immediately recompressed to an accumulated strain of 0.045. (C) Sample compressed to a strain of 0.025 and (D) unloaded, immediately annealed at 150°C for 3 hours, and recompressed to an accumulated strain of 0.045. (E to H) Electron back-scatter diffraction (EBSD) maps showing microstructure changes. (E) Mg–0.2 atomic % Gd alloy compressed to 0.080 strain, and (F) unloaded, annealed at 300°C for 20 min. (G) Mg–0.4 atomic % Zn alloy compressed to 0.080 strain, and (H) unloaded, annealed at 300°C for 20 min. For each sample, EBSD maps were obtained from exactly the same location after the heat treatment. (I) Engineering stress–strain curves of three samples of the same alloy from compression tests. Curve 1 is the same test as for (A) and (B). Curve 2 is the same test as for (C) and (D). Curve 3 is the same as for curve 1 but heat treated at 150°C for 3 hours before first loading. Sample details are available in table S1.
The pinning effect on the mechanical properties of a binary Mg–Gd solid solution alloy is shown in Fig. 4I. Three identical samples were compression tested at room temperature. The first sample was loaded, unloaded, and immediately reloaded; we observed little strength change from the testing interruption. The second specimen was annealed at 150°C for 3 hours after unloading and before reloading, which led to an appreciable strengthening effect, rather than the weakening that would be expected according to conventional understanding. Before the first loading of the third specimen, it was given the same heat treatment, but this caused neither a weakening nor the strengthening that was observed in the second specimen.
The findings are expected to lead to new insights into the structure and chemistry of fully coherent twin boundaries in other hexagonal materials and cubic materials, as well as strategies for engineering the design of alloy compositions and thermomechanical processes in order to achieve desired formability and mechanical properties.
Supplementary Materials
www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/340/6135/957/DC1
Materials and Methods
Supplementary Text
Figs. S1 to S8
Tables S1 to S4
References and Notes
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Acknowledgments: The authors are grateful for the support of the Australian Research Council and for access to the facilities of the Monash Centre for Electron Microscopy and the National Computational Infrastructure at Australian National University. Further information on the alloys, experimental procedures, and computation details can be found in the supplementary materials.