You are currently viewing the abstract.
View Full TextLog in to view the full text
AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.
Register for free to read this article
As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Existing users log in.
More options
Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.
Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.
Abstract
We examined how correlated firing controls axon remodeling, using in vivo time-lapse imaging and electrophysiological analysis of individual retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons that were visually stimulated either synchronously or asynchronously relative to neighboring inputs in the Xenopus laevis optic tectum. RGCs stimulated out of synchrony rapidly lost the ability to drive tectal postsynaptic partners while their axons grew and added many new branches. In contrast, synchronously activated RGCs produced fewer new branches, but these were more stable. The effects of synchronous activation were prevented by the inhibition of neurotransmitter release and N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) blockade, which is consistent with a role for synaptic NMDAR activation in the stabilization of axonal branches and suppression of further exploratory branch addition.
Firing, wiring, and Hebbian remodeling
Correlated neuronal activity is generally thought to drive circuit remodeling in the central nervous system. This model, first proposed by Hebb, is strongly supported by several lines of evidence, though it has been difficult to directly observe such changes in real time. Munz et al. developed an experimental approach to watch structural remodeling of neuronal axons in vivo at high temporal resolution. They measured changes in synaptic efficacy while presenting specific patterned stimuli to test the Hebb model. Although the key predictions of Hebbian developmental plasticity were upheld, the mechanistic details of how this occurred were unexpected.
Science, this issue p. 904
