Research Article

Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  13 Feb 2015:
Vol. 347, Issue 6223, 1259855
DOI: 10.1126/science.1259855

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed.  Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

  • Scientism and utopian thought

    The planetary boundaries discourse presented here explicates a train of thought I explored in a contribution to the Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. In short, Steffen et al. embrace the incoherency of scientism as a means to delineate the planetary boundaries within which life in its fullest – as science knows it – needs to keep true to the Holocene and withstand the Anthropocene. As a result, their contribution stands in a long and flawed tradition of utopian texts not equatable with science at all.

    Competing Interests: None declared.

Navigate This Article