Letters

Instituting recruiting meritocracy in Italy

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  22 Apr 2016:
Vol. 352, Issue 6284, pp. 422
DOI: 10.1126/science.352.6284.422-a

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed.  Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Compose eLetter

Plain text

  • Plain text
    No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

  • Recruitment of young scientists in Italy
    • Francesco Nicoli, PostDoc, INSERM, U1135, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, DHU FAST, CR7, Centre d’Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses (CIMI

    As a young Italian researcher, currently abroad for a postdoctoral experience, I followed with great interest the development of the Human-Technopole, a new research center that will be built in Milan and managed by a private foundation (Italian Institute of Technology – IIT). This project has been recently discussed in your Journal by Dr. Assad (1), who claimed that IIT has a tenure-track system which favors meritocratic selection, while the same is not true for public institutions (e.g. Universities).
    I truly believe in the recruitment system established at the IIT. However, I wish to point out that recruitment policies in public Italian institutions are developed in a different legal framework, with more constrains and lower budgets than those of private institutes. The system criticized by Dr. Assad is often the only way to ensure some sort of tenure track perspectives to excellent young scientists that otherwise are forced to quit science despite high level publications, years of experience in Italy and abroad and the ability to win national and international grants. What should be blamed is thus not the current behavior of Universities, which fight with bureaucracy and lack of funds to keep the most promising scientists, but the whole recruitment system of public research institutes, with the lack of a formalized tenure track system and the extreme rarity of available positions. An “international meritocratic recruitment”, as suggested by Dr. Assad, would be id...

    Show More
    Competing Interests: None declared.