Mechanistic basis for a molecular triage reaction

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  20 Jan 2017:
Vol. 355, Issue 6322, pp. 298-302
DOI: 10.1126/science.aah6130

Deciding a protein's fate

Protein synthesis inside cells is finely balanced with protein degradation to maintain homeostasis. Shao et al. show how differential affinities and binding kinetics of three chaperones regulate the fate of tail-anchored (TA) membrane proteins. The chaperone SGTA binds to TA proteins and quickly transfers them to the targeting factor TRC40 through the C-terminal domain of the quality-control module BAG6. Proteins that dissociate from SGTA can either rebind or, at a slower rate, be bound by the C-terminal domain of BAG6. The latter puts them on a path to degradation. This hierarchy means that biosynthesis has the higher priority, but excess free TA proteins are degraded.

Science, this issue p. 298


Newly synthesized proteins are triaged between biosynthesis and degradation to maintain cellular homeostasis, but the decision-making mechanisms are unclear. We reconstituted the core reactions for membrane targeting and ubiquitination of nascent tail-anchored membrane proteins to understand how their fate is determined. The central six-component triage system is divided into an uncommitted client-SGTA complex, a self-sufficient targeting module, and an embedded but self-sufficient quality control module. Client-SGTA engagement of the targeting module induces rapid, private, and committed client transfer to TRC40 for successful biosynthesis. Commitment to ubiquitination is dictated primarily by comparatively slower client dissociation from SGTA and nonprivate capture by the BAG6 subunit of the quality control module. Our results provide a paradigm for how priority and time are encoded within a multichaperone triage system.

Protein biosynthesis and quality control pathways are precisely balanced to provide nascent proteins an initial opportunity to mature while favoring degradation over time (13). Deviations from this balance lead to premature degradation of normal maturation intermediates or persistence of misfolded proteins, either of which can cause disease (2, 4, 5). Although accurate triage between biosynthesis and degradation is essential for maintaining protein homeostasis, a mechanistic understanding of protein triage for any pathway has been hampered by the lack of a fully reconstituted system that faithfully recapitulates both the biosynthetic and quality control outcomes of a nascent protein.

To achieve this goal, we chose the pathway of tail-anchored (TA) membrane protein insertion as a model. TA proteins engage a conserved and well-defined pathway for targeting and insertion at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (68), which in mammals is monitored by an embedded quality control (QC) pathway (9, 10) to degrade products that fail targeting (fig. S1). Studies of the yeast TA targeting pathway (7, 1113) and the mammalian TA targeting (6, 1416) and ubiquitination (9, 10) reactions suggest that six core factors constitute a minimal mammalian triage system amenable to complete reconstitution.

Three of the factors (SGTA, BAG6, and TRC40) can recognize and shield the transmembrane domain (TMD) of a TA protein client (6, 1618). TRC40, the targeting factor, delivers TA proteins to the ER for insertion (6), whereas BAG6, a QC factor, recruits the E3 ligase RNF126 for TA protein ubiquitination (10). However, the role of SGTA in either of these outcomes is less well established (19, 20). We found that depleting SGTA from an in vitro translation lysate impaired nascent TA protein capture by TRC40 and BAG6 (Fig. 1A and fig. S2A), with concomitant reductions in ER insertion and ubiquitination (fig. S2, B and C). Conversely, depleting BAG6 (with its tightly associated UBL4A and TRC35 subunits) (16) or TRC40 caused retention of TA protein on SGTA (fig. S2D). Thus, SGTA can act upstream of and facilitates both targeting and ubiquitination, suggesting that TA proteins bound to SGTA are uncommitted to either fate.

Fig. 1 Functional architecture of the TA protein triage system.

(A) Translation reactions of a 35S-labeled TA protein containing the VAMP2 TMD in complete (C) or SGTA-depleted (∆S) rabbit reticulocyte lysate (RRL), without or with recombinant glutathione S-transferase (GST)–SGTA, were subjected to chemical cross-linking (XL), immunoprecipitations (IPs) of the indicated factors, separation by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and visualization of TA–cross-linked products with autoradiography (tot., total reaction). (B) RRL was depleted of the BAG6 complex (∆BAG6 comp.) and replenished with recombinant BAG6 subcomplexes (fig. S3) as indicated (B, BAG6; U, UBL4A; T, TRC35). The lysates were analyzed by co-IP using nonimmune (NI) antibodies or antibodies against SGTA (S), followed by immunoblot (IB, top), or tested for interaction of a newly translated TA protein (VAMP2) with TRC40 by cross-linking and IPs using antibodies against TRC40 (bottom). (C) Organization of the TA triage system, deduced from the interactions shown in (B). (D) Interactions by a newly translated TA protein (VAMP2) were assayed by cross-linking and IPs from control or BAG6-depleted RRL without or with the cBAG6 complex (cB/U/T; fig. S4A). (E) Interactions by a newly translated FLAG-tagged TA substrate (VAMP2) in the indicated lysates (fig. S4B) were analyzed by IP using antibodies against the FLAG epitope and immunoblotting for the indicated factors. A delta indicates immunodepletion and an asterisk indicates a point mutant that, by homology to yeast proteins, disrupts intermolecular interactions.

Depletion-replenishment experiments replacing endogenous proteins with recombinant variants revealed the functional roles for all of the factors and interactions. The three-protein BAG6 complex was essential for optimal TA protein capture by TRC40 and bridged the interaction between SGTA and TRC40 via UBL4A and TRC35, respectively (14, 21) (Fig. 1, B and C, and fig. S3). Absence of either factor in BAG6 subcomplexes impaired SGTA-TRC40 bridging and TA protein capture by TRC40 (Fig. 1B). SGTA can also interact weakly with the N-terminal ubiquitin-like (UBL) domain of BAG6 (Fig. 1, B and C), but this was dispensable for TRC40 capture because only the C-terminal 110 residues of BAG6 (termed cBAG6) could form a complex with UBL4A and TRC35 (fig. S4A) (14) to fully replace the complete BAG6 complex in mediating TA protein capture by TRC40 (Fig. 1D). Point mutations that disrupt interactions between the cBAG6 complex and either SGTA or TRC40 (22, 23) reduced TA protein transfer to TRC40 (Fig. 1E and fig. S4B). The complementary N-terminal part of BAG6 (nBAG6, residues 1 to 1007), although dispensable for TRC40 capture, was sufficient to restore TA protein ubiquitination to a lysate depleted of the BAG6 complex (fig. S4, C to E). Thus, considering our results along with earlier observations (911, 14, 16), we can assign each TA protein fate to different subsets of interacting factors: The targeting module consists of SGTA and TRC40 bridged by the cBAG6 complex, whereas the QC module consists of SGTA, nBAG6, and RNF126.

Analyses with purified factors rigorously established the sufficiency of these modules. In these experiments, radiolabeled TA protein was synthesized with purified Escherichia coli translation factors supplemented with the desired TMD-binding chaperone (fig. S5). This orthogonal system produces homogeneous TA-chaperone complexes that can be used for downstream functional assays (24). Isolated TA-TRC40 complex was competent for ER targeting and insertion (Fig. 2A), but not ubiquitination by RNF126 (fig. S6). In contrast, the TA-BAG6 complex could not mediate insertion, but it allowed ubiquitination via RNF126 recruitment to BAG6’s N-terminal UBL domain (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2 Reconstitution of TA protein triage with purified factors.

(A) Recombinant TA-SGTA and TA-TRC40 complexes (fig. S5; TA protein contains the VAMP2 TMD) were assayed for insertion into ER-derived rough microsomes (RMs) by TA protein glycosylation (glyc.). (B) TA protein (VAMP2) in complex with recombinant BAG6 (wild type, WT) or ∆UBL BAG6 was assayed for ubiquitination (Ub) by RNF126. (C) TA-SGTA complex (VAMP2) was incubated with the indicated components and analyzed for insertion into RMs by glycosylation. The small amount of insertion seen in lane 4 is due to residual TRC40 that copurified with the RMs. (D) TA-SGTA complex (VAMP2) was incubated with the indicated components and assayed for TA protein ubiquitination (ubiq.). All reactions were conducted with 650 nM of each TRC component.

The TA-SGTA complex in isolation was not competent for insertion (Fig. 2C) or RNF126-mediated ubiquitination (Fig. 2D, lanes 1 to 3), but it could lead to either fate if the minimal targeting (Fig. 2C) or QC module was provided (Fig. 2D, lanes 4 and 5, and fig. S6). The complete system containing the entire BAG6 complex and TRC40 (Fig. 2D, lane 7) produced a low level of ubiquitination, a ~70% reduction relative to the QC module (lanes 4 and 5) or the complete system lacking TRC40 (lane 6). Because TRC40 did not inhibit ubiquitination by the isolated QC module (lanes 4 and 5), reduced ubiquitination in the complete system is due to preferential TA protein capture by TRC40 (via the targeting module) at the expense of capture by BAG6. This mirrors observations made in total cytosol, where targeting is the primary outcome, whereas normally low levels of ubiquitination increase if targeting fails. Thus, a completely recombinant system can faithfully recapitulate TA protein triage.

To understand client flow within the triage system, we introduced a photo–cross-linking residue in the center of the TA protein TMD by site-specific amber codon suppression (fig. S7) and prepared this modified TA protein in complex with Ca2+-bound calmodulin (CaM) (fig. S8). TA protein chaperoned by CaM can be synchronously released by adding the Ca2+ chelator EGTA. The subsequent interactions made by the TA protein TMD can be monitored by ultraviolet (UV)–induced cross-linking of samples that are flash-frozen at defined times (Fig. 3A). This strategy revealed that TA protein released from CaM is captured rapidly (in 2 s) and completely by SGTA, nBAG6, and TRC40 when each is the only available chaperone (Fig. 3B, lanes 4 to 6). Combining all three chaperones at equimolar amounts (lane 7) revealed a rank order for the proportion of free TA that they captured: SGTA (55 ± 4%) > nBAG6 (36 ± 4%) ≫ TRC40 (9 ± 1%) (Fig. 3C). Competitive capture using the estimated ratio of endogenous chaperones (fig. S9) showed an even stronger preference for SGTA capture (69 ± 2%). Considered together with the possibility that general chaperones such as Hsp70 might further funnel substrates to SGTA (11) and that a substantial proportion of TRC40 is membrane-bound and unavailable for capture (6), we conclude that the majority of TA substrates emerging into the cytosol initially engage SGTA. Consistent with TRC40 being a poor competitor for free TA protein, isolated TRC40 (but not SGTA or BAG6) fails to capture a highly hydrophobic client before it is likely to aggregate (fig. S10A). This explains why more hydrophobic TA proteins are also more dependent on SGTA for efficient engagement of TRC40 in total lysate (fig. S10B).

Fig. 3 TMD binding and release by individual chaperones.

(A) TA protein (Sec61β) containing a photo–cross-linker (BpF) in the TMD (fig. S7) in complex with CaM (fig. S8) was synchronously released by addition of EGTA in the presence of the indicated components. The reactions were flash-frozen after 2 s and analyzed for TMD interactions by UV cross-linking on dry ice. (B) Autoradiography of the experiment described in (A) with 750 nM each of SGTA, TRC40, and nBAG6. (C) Quantification of the competitive capture of free TA(BpF) as in (B), with equimolar or physiological (1:0.2:1) ratios of SGTA:nBAG6:TRC40. SGTA is held constant at 750 nM (fig. S9). Shown are means ± SEM; n = 3 for each condition. (D) TA(BpF) (Sec61β) in complex with 750 nM SGTA, TRC40, or nBAG6 was mixed with 10-fold molar excess of CaM (10X CaM) and monitored over time by photo–cross-linking. The autoradiography of the time course of SGTA complexes is shown. (E) Quantification of TA protein release from the indicated chaperone to CaM (n = 3 for release from SGTA; n = 2 for release from TRC40 and BAG6; fig. S11). A.U., arbitrary units.

Photo–cross-linking assays of TA protein release from each chaperone by using excess CaM to sequester released product showed that TA protein dissociates rapidly from SGTA [half-time (t1/2) of ~12 s; Fig. 3, D and E]. Dissociation from BAG6 and TRC40 was at least 15 and 30 times as slow as that from SGTA, respectively (Fig. 3E and fig. S11). Thus, the chaperone that is least committed to stable binding (SGTA) is also most favored for capturing free TA protein, whereas the most committed chaperone (TRC40) is least favored for initial capture. A nascent TA protein would therefore preferentially initiate triage on SGTA, consistent with its assignment as an upstream and uncommitted factor of the pathway.

TA protein transfer from SGTA to the BAG6 complex (BAG6-UBL4A-TRC35, B/U/T) was two times as slow as the rate of TA protein dissociation from SGTA (Fig. 4A). Transfer was also observed to the isolated QC module of BAG6, but transfer was nearly nonexistent to ΔUBL (UBL-deleted) BAG6, which cannot interact with SGTA (fig. S12). This suggests that TA protein released from SGTA is primarily recaptured by SGTA, unless a high local concentration of BAG6 interacting with SGTA permits some capture by BAG6. Consistent with this interpretation, excess CaM in the SGTA-to-B/U/T transfer reaction led to TA protein loss from SGTA at a rate comparable to spontaneous dissociation, with TA protein appearing on CaM at the partial expense of BAG6 (Fig. 4A). Thus, the mechanism of TA protein transfer from SGTA to BAG6 involves spontaneous dissociation from SGTA and capture by nearby BAG6. At equal local concentrations of BAG6 and SGTA, competitive capture assays (Fig. 3B) suggest that ~40% of released TA protein would engage BAG6, and the remainder would be recaptured by SGTA.

Fig. 4 Pathways of TA protein flux through the triage system.

(A) Photo–cross-linking time course (top) and quantification (bottom) of TA(BpF) (Sec61β) transfer from SGTA to the BAG6 complex (B/U/T) without (n = 3) or with (n = 1) 10X CaM. Where applicable, means ± SEM are displayed with a first-order exponential decay fit. The gray dashed curve shows the rate of spontaneous TA protein release from SGTA to 10X CaM from Fig. 3E. (B) Photo–cross-linking time course (top) and quantification (bottom) of TA(BpF) (Sec61β) transfer from SGTA to TRC40 via cB/U/T without (n = 3) or with (n = 1) 10X CaM. (C) TA(BpF) (Sec61β) in complex with SGTA (top) or CaM (bottom) was incubated with the indicated factors and analyzed for TMD interactions at various times by photo–cross-linking. (D) Photo–cross-linking time course of TA(BpF) (Sec61β) transfer from SGTA in the presence of the full BAG6 complex (B/U/T) and TRC40 without or with 10X CaM. (E) Direct comparison of TA(BpF) photo–cross-linking interactions in the complete triage reaction after 5 min without (n = 3 used for quantification) or with (n = 2) 10X CaM. The extent of TA protein interaction with BAG6 and TRC40 was quantified (right; means ± SEM). All reactions contained 750 nM of each TRC factor.

Stable TA protein interaction with BAG6 (Fig. 3E and fig. S11) and prompt ubiquitination (fig. S13) would minimize excessive cycles of TA protein release and recapture by SGTA. Although the downstream steps remain to be studied, the ubiquitinated TA protein–BAG6 complex would presumably be a strong substrate for proteasome binding via the BAG6 UBL domain and client ubiquitin(s). This would effectively commit most BAG6-bound TA proteins to degradation. Even if RNF126 or the proteasome system is temporarily unavailable, the relatively slow TA protein dissociation from BAG6 (Fig. 3E and fig. S11) and inefficient transfer back to SGTA (fig. S14) suggest that reversion to an uncommitted state is probably minimal under physiologic conditions. Thus, the rate of TA protein transfer to BAG6 imposes a time limit for how long clients remain in an uncommitted state on SGTA.

TA protein transfer from SGTA to TRC40 via the cBAG6 complex displayed entirely different behavior. Transfer was twice as fast as the rate of spontaneous TA protein dissociation from SGTA (Fig. 4B). Importantly, neither the cBAG6 complex nor TRC40 alone triggered TA protein release from SGTA (fig. S15), arguing against an interaction-triggered transfer. Given that TRC40 competed poorly for free TA protein (Fig. 3, B and C), this transfer reaction appears to be a concerted handover. Indeed, TRC40 acquisition of TA protein from SGTA was comparably efficient in the presence of excess CaM, whose only effect was to minimize SGTA recapture (Fig. 4B). Similarly, the SGTA-to-TRC40 transfer was not competed by nBAG6, which readily intercepted the otherwise efficient substrate transfer from CaM to TRC40 (Fig. 4C). This illustrates that the SGTA-to-TRC40 transfer occurs without a free TA protein intermediate, and it is hence defined as “private.” TA protein release from SGTA during the private transfer reaction required TRC40 to be competent for substrate binding (fig. S16). This suggests a mechanism of TA protein partitioning between closely juxtaposed SGTA and TRC40, explaining why it is private and how it can occur faster than the TA protein dissociation rate from SGTA.

Transfer from SGTA to TRC40 in the complete triage system, where BAG6 is present at high local concentration, was essentially indistinguishable from that seen with only the targeting module (Fig. 4D). The small amount of substrate capture by BAG6 is presumably due to the small proportion that dissociates from SGTA within the ~10 s needed to complete the private transfer to TRC40, and it is probably the same population that is accessible to CaM in the reaction containing only the targeting module (Fig. 4B). Consistent with this interpretation, excess CaM in the complete reaction preferentially competed with the QC module for TA protein, with minimal effect on the targeting module (Fig. 4E). Thus, transfer of TA protein from SGTA to TRC40 is fast and private, whereas TA protein transfer from SGTA to BAG6 is slower and involves a transient chaperone-free intermediate.

Our results rationalize how three chaperones with similar client specificities can nevertheless be organized to encode both priority and time in a molecular triage reaction (fig. S17). The abilities of the three chaperones to compete for free TA protein are inversely related to their ability to retain the bound client (Fig. 3). Taking into account their relative abundances in the cytosol (fig. S9) and the ability of SGTA to sample housekeeping chaperones (11), nascent clients preferentially engage SGTA, the least committed chaperone that affords the most options. From this starting point, the distinct mechanisms of TA protein transfer from SGTA to BAG6 versus TRC40 (Fig. 4), combined with the embedding of BAG6 within the targeting module (Fig. 1), determine both prioritization and timing of triage.

Biosynthesis is the higher priority because of the rapid and private mechanism of transfer to TRC40. The time allowed for this prioritized fate is limited by the rate of spontaneous TA protein dissociation from SGTA, combined with the number of times that SGTA recaptures TA protein for additional transfer attempts. Recapture is competed by BAG6, which is at a high local concentration because of its ability to interact with SGTA. Were BAG6 not embedded at the transfer site, released TA protein would be recaptured by SGTA repeatedly, increasing the risk of aggregation by prolonging the dwell time of a membrane protein in the cytosol. On the basis of ~40% capture by BAG6 relative to SGTA at equal concentrations, we estimate that ~80% of substrates would be committed to BAG6 within three cycles of SGTA recapture.

A time limit on private transfer to TRC40 means that after the initial unimpeded transfer attempt, further delays progressively favor ubiquitination. The rate of substrate transfer is likely influenced by the biophysical features of the TRC40 binding site (17, 24) and steric constraints imposed by the yet-undefined architecture of SGTA relative to TRC40. Thus, membrane proteins that do not meet these criteria, which have presumably evolved to favor ER-destined TA proteins, are degraded by default. This implies that the rate of TA protein transfer from SGTA to TRC40, combined with the normal off rate for different types of clients from SGTA, increases the fidelity of client selection for ER targeting.

Because TA protein dissociation from SGTA follows first-order kinetics with a t1/2 of 12 s, ~25% would dissociate within 5 s, almost half of which would be captured by BAG6. Although transfer to TRC40 is fast, some loss seems inevitable. Consistent with this, we found that even under optimal conditions in cytosolic extract or pulse-labeled cells, ~10% of a TA substrate was lost to BAG6. The benefit of an embedded QC module in avoiding aggregation presumably offsets the cost of constitutively degrading a low level of otherwise productive maturation intermediates. Yeasts, which do not have an embedded QC module, may favor overall efficiency to drive rapid growth, while mitigating failure by using disaggregases (25) and asymmetric aggregate partitioning to mother cells (26).

QC modules embedded within a biosynthetic pathway, differential kinetics of client engagement and release, and a combination of private and nonprivate transfer reactions are principles that are probably generally applicable beyond the TA protein system. Both the cytosol and endoplasmic reticulum contain polypeptide-binding proteins that recognize similar features (typically hydrophobicity) and contain scaffolding proteins that bring chaperones and QC factors together (2, 3, 27, 28). Although analysis of client handling by chaperones (29) or ubiquitin ligases (30) in isolation have provided considerable mechanistic insights, an understanding of their roles in protein triage necessarily requires quantitative analyses of their functions as a collective. The triage system reconstituted in this study provides a roadmap for analogous cellular biosynthesis pathways.

Supplementary Materials

Materials and Methods

Figs. S1 to S17

References (3145)

References and Notes

  1. Acknowledgments: We thank N. Sinha and M. Mariappan for help during the early stages of this project, R. Keenan for reagents, L. Miller for comments on the manuscript, T. Rapoport and Rapoport laboratory members for equipment access, and Hegde laboratory members for discussions. This work was supported by the U.K. Medical Research Council (MRC; MC_UP_A022_1007 to R.S.H.); a MRC career development fellowship, a St John’s College Title A fellowship, and Harvard Medical School startup funds (to S.S.); and a Life Sciences Research Foundation fellowship supported by the Ellison Medical Foundation/American Federation for Aging Research (to M.C.R.-B.). S.S. and R.S.H. designed the study. S.S. performed the experiments. M.C.R.-B. provided reagents and advice for ubiquitination assays. M.H.K. generated most PURE translation system components. S.S. and R.S.H. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. Additional data can be found in the supplementary materials.
View Abstract

Stay Connected to Science

Navigate This Article