Vaccines on trial

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  28 Apr 2017:
Vol. 356, Issue 6336, pp. 370-373
DOI: 10.1126/science.356.6336.370

You are currently viewing the summary.

View Full Text

Log in to view the full text

Log in through your institution

Log in through your institution


Leah Durant may be unique among vaccine injury lawyers: She was moved to begin representing people hurt by vaccines after sustaining her own painful shoulder injury, the result of a tetanus injection administered too high on her arm. Durant's Washington, D.C., practice at what is popularly known at the vaccine court provides a window into rare but real—as opposed to bogus—vaccine risks. Among these, shoulder injuries like Durant's are easily the most common brought to the court by petitioners. Others include nerve-damaging autoimmune reactions like Guillain-Barré syndrome and brachial neuritis; and a multisystem allergic reaction known as anaphylaxis. The 30-year-old vaccine court, part of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, provides a no-fault route to compensation for those hurt by real vaccine injuries—with the costs of their lawyers picked up by the government.