You are currently viewing the summary.
View Full TextLog in to view the full text
AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.
More options
Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.
Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.
Summary
Charging that thousands of patients are being misled and may be unnecessarily placed at increased risk of death, a U.S. watchdog group last week demanded that federal regulators suspend a major clinical trial exploring when to offer blood transfusions after a heart attack. The group, Public Citizen in Washington, D.C., expressed concern about “regulatory and ethical lapses,” but the trial’s organizers and backers denied that accusation and defended it as necessary to answer a key question that hospitals face every day. The resulting debate among cardiologists, ethicists, and trial designers underscores vexing issues in clinical medicine.