An evolutionarily conserved gene family encodes proton-selective ion channels

See allHide authors and affiliations

Science  02 Mar 2018:
Vol. 359, Issue 6379, pp. 1047-1050
DOI: 10.1126/science.aao3264

The proton channel behind sour taste

Although many proteins that form ion channels in cell membranes have been described, none that selectively conduct protons into eukaryotic cells have been identified. Tu et al. used a genetic screen to pinpoint candidate genes that might encode such a protein from mouse taste receptor cells (see the Perspective by Montell). They identified the known protein otopetrin and showed that it conferred proton conductance when expressed in cultured human cells. Their results indicate that otopetrin may function in sensory recognition of sour (acidic) taste in humans and other organisms.

Science, this issue p. 1047; see also p. 991


Ion channels form the basis for cellular electrical signaling. Despite the scores of genetically identified ion channels selective for other monatomic ions, only one type of proton-selective ion channel has been found in eukaryotic cells. By comparative transcriptome analysis of mouse taste receptor cells, we identified Otopetrin1 (OTOP1), a protein required for development of gravity-sensing otoconia in the vestibular system, as forming a proton-selective ion channel. We found that murine OTOP1 is enriched in acid-detecting taste receptor cells and is required for their zinc-sensitive proton conductance. Two related murine genes, Otop2 and Otop3, and a Drosophila ortholog also encode proton channels. Evolutionary conservation of the gene family and its widespread tissue distribution suggest a broad role for proton channels in physiology and pathophysiology.

Ion channels include a large and diverse group of membrane proteins that rapidly, and with great selectivity, move ions across the cell membrane, performing crucial roles in cell signaling and homeostasis (1). Ion channels selective for each of the physiologically relevant ions, Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Cl, have been described at the molecular and structural levels (2, 3), but only a few types of proton-selective ion channels (proton channels) have been described (4). One is the 96–amino acid M2 protein of influenza A, which conducts protons into the virion interior, an essential step in the replication of the virus (5). The only proton-selective ion channel identified in eukaryotes is the voltage-gated Hv1 (68), which is present in immune cells, where it extrudes protons into the phagosome to inactivate infectious agents (9). Functional evidence indicates that ion channels that selectively transport protons into eukaryotic cells must also exist. For example, in acid-sensing taste receptor cells (TRCs), an inward-conducting Zn2+-sensitive proton current that is biophysically distinct from currents carried by Hv1 has been described (10, 11).

To identify candidates encoding such a proton channel, we compared the transcriptome of mouse TRCs positive for the inward-conducting Zn2+-sensitive proton current (PKD2L1 cells) with that of TRCs that lack the current (TRPM5 cells; Fig. 1A). We selected genes that were enriched in PKD2L1 cells and that encoded poorly characterized or uncharacterized transmembrane proteins (Fig. 1A and table S1) (see methods). We expressed the candidates in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK-293) cells or Xenopus oocytes and measured ionic currents in response to lowering the extracellular pH (pHo) in the absence of extracellular Na+. Of the 41 cDNAs tested, only Otopetrin1 (Otop1), which encodes a protein (OTOP1) with 12 predicted transmembrane domains (12), generated large Zn2+-sensitive inward currents in response to extracellular acidification (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1 Expression analysis of taste-cell–enriched genes identifies OTOP1 as a previously unknown proton channel.

(A) Transcriptome profiling of PKD2L1 and TRPM5 taste receptor cells (each data point represents the average of five replicates). Genes tested by electrophysiology are highlighted in magenta or red (Otop1). RPM, reads per million. (B) Magnitude of currents evoked in response to pH 4.5 Na+-free solution in Xenopus oocytes expressing the genes indicated (Vm = –80 mV; data are mean ± SEM, n = 3 to 37 cells; for OTOP1, n = 5). ****P < 0.0001 compared to uninjected oocytes (n = 3). One-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. (Inset) Currents evoked in an OTOP1-expressing oocyte in response to the acid stimulus at Vm = –80mV (left) and the current-voltage (I-V) relationship before application (gray), during acid application (green), and during Zn2+ application (black). (C) Current measured by two-electrode voltage clamp in a Xenopus oocyte expressing OTOP1 in response to Na+-free extracellular solutions with pHo as indicated (Vm = –80 mV). (D) I-V relation of the current in (A) from voltage ramps (1 V/s). (E) Evoked current (ΔI; mean ± SEM) as a function of pH in Xenopus oocytes expressing OTOP1 (blue circle; n = 4) and uninjected oocytes (gray circles; n = 4). (F) Currents measured by whole-cell patch clamp recording in a HEK-293 cell expressing OTOP1 in Na+-free extracellular solutions (pHi = 7.3, Vm = –80 mV). (G) I-V relation of currents in an OTOP1-expressing HEK-293 cell from experiments as in (G) with voltage ramps (1 V/s). (H) Evoked currents (ΔI; mean ± SEM) as a function of pH in HEK-293 cells expressing OTOP1 (blue squares; n = 5) and untransfected cells (gray squares; n = 3).

We characterized functional properties of OTOP1 expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Unless otherwise noted, the extracellular solution used in recordings was Na+-free [N-methyl-d-glucamine (NMDG+)–based]. OTOP1 currents increased monotonically as pHo was lowered (Fig. 1, C to E) and the reversal potential (Erev) shifted toward more positive voltages (Fig. 1D and fig. S1A). The currents showed a small time-dependent change in amplitude in response to hyperpolarizing voltage steps, indicating that gating of OTOP1 is mildly voltage-sensitive (fig. S1, B and C).

OTOP1 also generated an ionic current in HEK-293 cells (Fig. 1, F to H). An N-terminal YFP (yellow fluorescent protein)–tagged protein confirmed the presence of OTOP1 at the cell surface (fig. S2A). Lowering pHo elicited large inward currents in OTOP1-expressing cells and, as in oocytes, the current magnitude increased monotonically with pHo (Fig. 1, F to H). OTOP1 currents in HEK-293 cells decayed within seconds, with faster kinetics observed in response to more acidic stimuli (Fig. 1F). The decay of the currents is likely to be due, in part, to a reduction in the driving force as protons accumulate in the cytosol. For a 15-μm-diameter cell (1767 fl volume), a H+ current of 1000 pA flowing for 1 s will increase the total (bound + free) intracellular concentration of H+ by ~6 mM (4). We confirmed that OTOP1 mediated flux of protons into the cell cytosol with the membrane-permeant pH indicator pHrodo Red. In Otop1-transfected cells, but not in mock-transfected cells, lowering extracellular pH from 7.4 to 5.0 caused a large increase in emission of pHrodo Red (Fig. 2, A and B), corresponding to a large change in intracellular pH (fig. S2, B and C).

Fig. 2 Selectivity of OTOP1 for protons.

(A) Fluorescence emission of the pH indicator pHrodo Red in HEK-293 cells expressing OTOP1 (n = 9) and sham-transfected cells (n = 11; mean ± SEM) in response to the stimuli indicated. Similar results were obtained in three replicates. (B) Average data (mean ± SEM; n = 28 or 29 cells) were analyzed by two-tailed t test. ****P < 0.0001. HOAc (acetic acid), which shuttles protons across membranes (4), served as a positive control. (C) OTOP1 currents in HEK-293 cells were evoked in response to a pH 5.5 solution with Na+, Li+, or Cs+ (160 mM each) or Ca2+ (40 mM) replacing NMDG+ in the extracellular solution as indicated (Vm = –80 mV). Percentage change in currents was 0.4 ± 0.7 (n = 8), 2.7 ± 0.7 (n = 8), 2.4 ± 0.5 (n = 8), and 3.6 ± 1.7 (n = 7) for each ion replacement, respectively. (D) Isolated OTOP1 currents in response to voltage ramps (1 V/s) at varying extracellular pH (pHi = 6.0; Zn2+-sensitive component is shown; see fig. S5 and methods). (E) Erev as a function of ΔpH (pHi – pHo) from experiments as in (D). The red line is the equilibrium potential for H+, EH. The data were fit by linear regression with a slope of 53 mV/ΔpH and a y intercept of 3.6 mV (correlation coefficient R2 = 0.99).

Hv1 and M2 are highly selective for protons, present in high nanomolar concentrations, over other cations whose concentrations are a million times higher (4, 13). To determine if OTOP1 is similarly proton-selective, we evoked Otop1 currents by lowering pHo from 7.4 to 5.5 and measured the effect of exchanging NMDG+ in the extracellular solution for equimolar concentrations of Na+, Cs+, or Li+ or isosmotic concentrations of Ca2+ (Fig. 2C). In all cases, the observed change in current magnitude was less than 4%, indicating that OTOP1 is not appreciably permeable to these ions. Similar experiments showed that OTOP1 is not appreciably permeable to K+ (fig. S3). To directly assess the selectivity of the channel for protons, we measured the potential at which the current reversed direction, the reversal potential (Erev), as a function of the H+ gradient (ΔpH = pHi – pHo). To study a predominantly OTOP1 current, we applied Zn2+ at a concentration that selectively and fully blocked the OTOP1 current in HEK-293 cells and focused on the Zn2+-sensitive component of the current (figs. S4 and S5, A and B). We limited H+ accumulation by setting pHi at 6.0 and holding the membrane potential at Erev (fig. S5A; see methods). Under these conditions, Erev closely followed the Nernst prediction for an H+-selective ion channel (Fig. 2, D and E). To determine the selectivity of OTOP1 for H+ relative to Na+ and Cl, we measured Erev upon replacement of NMDG+ by Na+ and with high and low concentrations of Cl in the extracellular solution. In no case did we observe any change in Erev (fig. S5C). Assuming a change in Erev of less than 5 mV, which would have been detectable, we used the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation to calculate the selectivity of OTOP1 for H+ relative to Na+ at greater than 2 × 105–fold and H+ to Cl at greater than 1 × 105–fold (13).

OTOP1 is a member of the otopetrin family of proteins, which is evolutionarily conserved from nematodes to humans (12, 14) (Fig. 3A). We confirmed that human OTOP1 (hOTOP1) forms a channel with properties similar to those of murine OTOP1 (fig. S6). Murine OTOP2 and OTOP3 share 30 to 34% amino acid identity with murine OTOP1 (fig. S7). Each shows a distinctive pattern of expression. Otop1 is expressed in vestibular and taste cells, brown adipose tissue (15), heart, uterus, dorsal root ganglion, adrenal gland, mammary gland, and stimulated mast cells, whereas Otop2 expression is highest in stomach, testis, and olfactory bulb, and Otop3 is expressed in epidermis, small intestine, stomach, and retina [Fig. 3B; (16)]. When expressed in Xenopus oocytes, OTOP2 and OTOP3 both generated large currents in response to lowering pHo in a Na+-free solution. Compared with OTOP1 and OTOP3, OTOP2 currents behaved anomalously; currents saturated at ~pH 5, and Erev shifted little over a range of pH 4 to 6 (Fig. 3, C to E, and fig. S8A). OTOP2 currents measured in HEK-293 cells had similar properties (fig. S9). Like OTOP1, OTOP3 showed evidence of selectivity for H+; the magnitude of OTOP3 currents increased linearly as a function of pHo over the entire pH range tested (Fig. 3, F to H), and Erev shifted 46.3 mV/log[H+], close to the value of 58 mV/log[H+] expected for a proton-selective ion channel (fig. S8C). In response to hyperpolarizing voltage steps, OTOP2 and OTOP3 currents showed evidence of mild (OTOP3) or no (OTOP2) voltage dependence (fig. S8, B and D). When expressed in HEK-293 cells and assessed with microfluorimetry, both OTOP2 and OTOP3 conducted protons into the cell cytosol in response to lowering pHo (fig. S10), providing evidence that, like OTOP1, they form proton channels.

Fig. 3 An evolutionarily conserved family of genes, expressed in diverse tissues and encoding proton channels.

(A) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree from the multisequence alignment of 13 otopetrin domain proteins. Scale bar indicates amino acid substitutions per site. dm, Drosophila melanogaster; ce, Caenorhabditis elegans. (B) Distribution of Otop genes in selected murine tissues from microarray data (16). Scale represents expression level in arbitrary units (mean ± SEM, n = 2). (C, F, I) Representative traces (Vm = –80 mV) showing currents evoked in Xenopus oocytes expressing OTOP2, OTOP3, or dmOTOPLc in response to varying pHo of the Na+-free extracellular solution. (D, G, J) I-V relationship (from voltage ramps at 1 V/s) from experiments as in (C), (F), and (I). (E, H, K) The average current induced at Vm = –80 mV (ΔI) as a function of pH for oocytes expressing each of the channels (black circles; mean ± SEM, n = 3 to 7) and for uninjected oocytes (gray triangles, mean ± SEM, n = 3).

There are three genes in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster that encode proteins that appear to be evolutionarily related to mOTOP1 (12, 14) (Fig. 3A). The transcript CG42265 encodes dmOTOPLc, a protein of 1576 amino acids that over the region of similarity bears 14.1% amino acid identity with OTOP1. Despite the modest level of conservation, when expressed in Xenopus oocytes, dmOTOPLc conducted large currents in response to decreasing extracellular pH, indicating that it too forms a proton channel (Fig. 3, I to K). The shallow relation between the current amplitude and pH may endow the channel with a broader dynamic range.

OTOP1 is required for the development of otoconia, calcium carbonate–based structures that sense gravity and acceleration in the vestibular system. Two mutations of Otop1, tilted (tlt) and mergulhador (mlh; fig. S11A), lead to vestibular dysfunction in mice (14). These mutations affect trafficking of the protein to the cell surface in vestibular supporting cells (17). Mutant channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes produced smaller currents but otherwise had functional properties, such as sensitivity to Zn2+ (fig. S11, B and C), similar to those of wild-type OTOP1. This reduction in current magnitude may contribute to the vestibular dysfunction.

Finally, we sought to determine if OTOP1 contributes to the proton current in acid-sensing taste receptor cells (10, 11). We confirmed that in single-cell transcriptome data, Otop1 was expressed in PKD2L1 cells (19 out of 19) implicated in sour transduction (18), whereas Otop2 and Otop3 were expressed in much lower amounts, and none of the three Otop transcripts were detected in TRPM5 cells, which lack proton currents (Fig. 4A). By immunocytochemistry, we confirmed that OTOP1 was present in taste cells in mouse circumvallate papillae that express Pkd2l1 (Fig. 4B). To directly determine if OTOP1 contributes to the proton current in taste cells, we measured currents in taste cells from either wild-type mice or mice that were homozygous for the tlt mutation of Otop1. Mutation of Otop1 resulted in significantly smaller proton currents than those measured in taste cells from wild-type mice (Fig. 4, C and D), over a range of H+ concentrations (Fig. 4, E and F), indicating that OTOP1 is a component of the proton channel in taste cells. Although the contribution of proton currents to acid-sensing or sour taste behavior by mice is still speculative and complicated by contributions from multiple sensory organs and sensory receptors (19), the identification of OTOP1 as forming a proton channel provides a tool with which to start dissecting this system.

Fig. 4 Requirement of Otop1 for the proton current in taste receptor cells.

(A) Read counts per million (RPM) for the genes indicated from RNA-sequencing data obtained from single PKD2L1 (n = 19) or TRPM5 taste cells (n = 5). 0 RPM was adjusted to 0.01 RPM. (B) Confocal images showing taste buds in the circumvallate papillae from a mouse in which Pkd2l1 drives expression of YFP, immunostained with antibodies against YFP (green), OTOP1 (magenta), and TRPM5 (cyan). Scale bar, 10 μM. Arrow indicates taste pore. (C) Current in response to a pH 5.0 stimulus in isolated PKD2L1 TRCs from tlt mutant or wild-type (WT) mice in NMDG+-based solution (Vm = –80 mV). (D) Average data from experiments as in (C) (****P < 0.0001 by two tailed t test, n = 8 cells per genotype). (E) Response of PKD2L1 TRCs to NMDG+-based extracellular solution of varying pH (Vm = –80 mV). (F) Average data from experiments as in (E). (G) Voltage-gated Na+ currents in TRCs from tlt and wild-type mice were indistinguishable (P > 0.05, two-tailed t test).

Our data show that the otopetrin genes encodes a family of ion channels that are unrelated structurally to previously identified ion channels and are highly selective for protons. Unlike Hv1, OTOP1 is only weakly sensitive to voltage. Whether, like the viral proton channel M2 (13), low pH gates OTOP1 is not clear. OTOP channels conduct protons at normal resting potentials and can mediate the entry of protons into cells. Most cells guard against proton entry, which is generally cytotoxic. Thus, we expect that OTOP channels are restricted to cell types that use changes in intracellular pH for cell signaling or to regulate biochemical or developmental processes. Along with a role in formation of vestibular otoconia (14), OTOP1 has been shown to protect mice from obesity-induced metabolic dysfunction (15), and it is up-regulated in dorsal root ganglion cells in response to cell damage (20). The knowledge that this gene family encodes proton channels can be used to understand its contribution to physiology and disease.

Supplementary Materials

Materials and Methods

Figs. S1 to S11

Table S1

References (2134)

References and Notes

Acknowledgments: E.R.L. and the University of Southern California have filed a provisional patent application no. 62/537,900 that claims methods of screening molecules that modulate Otopetrin-dependent ion channel activities. We thank S. Rao, L. Goggins, A. Bernanke, P. Uren, and members of the Nuzhdin lab for technical assistance; J. Bushman for assistance with electrophysiology; and D. Arnold, B. Bean, B. Herring, and R. Kramer for careful reading of the manuscript. Funding was provided by the NIH grants R01DC013741 and R21DC012747 (to E.R.L.) and R01HG006015 (to A.D.S.).

Stay Connected to Science

Navigate This Article